Evidence of .pdf tampering with transcripts from Dzokhar Tsarnaev's arraignment hearing! May have been authored in 2006! | |
Screamer (OP) User ID: 45042546 United States 08/14/2013 10:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 41518311 United States 08/14/2013 10:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Screamer (OP) User ID: 45042546 United States 08/14/2013 10:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Evidence of .pdf tampering with transcripts from Dzokhar Tsarnaev's arraignment hearing! May have been authored in 2006! The Date set in the PC's BIOS is wrong. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 41518311 I do believe Dzokhar Tsarnaev is definitely a Patsy, but this is not a smoking gun of any sort. It's set 7 years behind? The computer with an internet connection has not had any synching with an atomic clock ? The document was also created on June 2,2006. If it was set 7 years behind, and came out on April 23,1013. How could it have been created on June 2, 2013? A court reporter in 2013 created a .pdf on a Windows XP Home PC ? A windows 7 or 8, or at least vista would make more sense. I also don't believe that this is the type of work you can take home to work on your old rachety pc. I would think that the OS would be a Professional version. Als, If using Mircosoft Word from anything later than 2007, you wouldn't need PDFfactory. Also PDF 3.52 did not come out until 2009. There has also been 6 different up-versions of PDFfactory since then. Why also an effort by the Wall Street journal to add a modification date of April 22, 2013, (which was not added on the CNN version), if the BIOS date was wrong and everyone should just shut the fuck up? Last Edited by Screamer on 08/14/2013 10:54 AM Screamer |
Screamer (OP) User ID: 45042546 United States 08/14/2013 11:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Evidence of .pdf tampering with transcripts from Dzokhar Tsarnaev's arraignment hearing! May have been authored in 2006! Also, isn't having the wrong creation date a huge problem for a legal document? It would affect the way it is archived and therefore retrieved. That is my theory. I don't know why it would have a modification date for the Wall Street Journal version and not the CNN one. Screamer |
Screamer (OP) User ID: 45042546 United States 08/14/2013 11:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Screamer (OP) User ID: 45042546 United States 08/14/2013 12:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45133918 United States 08/14/2013 12:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Evidence of .pdf tampering with transcripts from Dzokhar Tsarnaev's arraignment hearing! May have been authored in 2006! It's a show, where DC is creating the script, saying it was real. But the agencies they have created are real and think they have authority. Well, until they do not receive a paycheck. |
Screamer (OP) User ID: 45042546 United States 08/14/2013 04:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Evidence of .pdf tampering with transcripts from Dzokhar Tsarnaev's arraignment hearing! May have been authored in 2006! When do you think this was actually written? Everything in the properties is so outdated, but from different times. This clearly was not written in a court house or a legal place of business. Do you think DT's uncle Ruslan wrote it from Graham fuller's house, to frame DT when he was 12, probably because he hated Zubeidat so much? I've seen in-laws not liking their family's choice of spouse and then taking it out on the kids before. I have looked at all of the other legal documents, the indictment, the criminal complaint, etc. All of them were made in Acrobat, with the correct creation dates. Last Edited by Screamer on 08/14/2013 05:10 PM Screamer |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30943034 Spain 08/14/2013 05:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Evidence of .pdf tampering with transcripts from Dzokhar Tsarnaev's arraignment hearing! May have been authored in 2006! Also, isn't having the wrong creation date a huge problem for a legal document? It would affect the way it is archived and therefore retrieved. That is my theory. Quoting: Screamer I don't know why it would have a modification date for the Wall Street Journal version and not the CNN one. In 2004 there was this case by SCO, SCO is a patent troll basicly. They tried to sue DaimlerCrysler for using a Linux file system. Investigation of the official Word file showed that they first wanted to sue Bank of America, but later erased the words Bank of America and changed it to DaimlerCrysler. This totally messed up SCO's credibility. |
Screamer (OP) User ID: 45042546 United States 08/14/2013 05:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Evidence of .pdf tampering with transcripts from Dzokhar Tsarnaev's arraignment hearing! May have been authored in 2006! Also, isn't having the wrong creation date a huge problem for a legal document? It would affect the way it is archived and therefore retrieved. That is my theory. Quoting: Screamer I don't know why it would have a modification date for the Wall Street Journal version and not the CNN one. In 2004 there was this case by SCO, SCO is a patent troll basicly. They tried to sue DaimlerCrysler for using a Linux file system. Investigation of the official Word file showed that they first wanted to sue Bank of America, but later erased the words Bank of America and changed it to DaimlerCrysler. This totally messed up SCO's credibility. I'm sorry. I don't really see what that has to do with this. Is this case, there is no money or lawsuits. The modification of this pdf would be simply to have pre-written scripts to sell to the American audience, or to affect the archival of it as an official document. Did the SCO ever have any credibility? The SCO is a company merely set up to sue major companies (all funded by Microsoft). It buys up patents, simply to sue for them and fuck with other companies. The reasons for changing legal documents would be totally different in this case. Screamer |
Screamer (OP) User ID: 45042546 United States 08/14/2013 06:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Screamer (OP) User ID: 45042546 United States 08/14/2013 06:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Screamer (OP) User ID: 45042546 United States 08/14/2013 07:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45048863 United States 08/14/2013 08:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Screamer (OP) User ID: 45042546 United States 08/14/2013 08:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2269485 United States 08/14/2013 08:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Screamer (OP) User ID: 45042546 United States 08/14/2013 08:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Evidence of .pdf tampering with transcripts from Dzokhar Tsarnaev's arraignment hearing! May have been authored in 2006! What agenda would I have? I have been interested in getting to the bottom of this case. I have more free time since yesterday. Everyone here believes it is fake, so its not like I have to convince anyone Screamer |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2269485 United States 08/14/2013 08:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Evidence of .pdf tampering with transcripts from Dzokhar Tsarnaev's arraignment hearing! May have been authored in 2006! What agenda would I have? I have been interested in getting to the bottom of this case. I have more free time since yesterday. Quoting: Screamer Everyone here believes it is fake, so its not like I have to convince anyone I don't know it is just that the two posts about the Tsarnaev's are they only ones you've ever made. Everyone here believes what is fake? |
Screamer (OP) User ID: 45042546 United States 08/14/2013 09:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Evidence of .pdf tampering with transcripts from Dzokhar Tsarnaev's arraignment hearing! May have been authored in 2006! ^Everyone knows that the official story is fake. I'm relatively new. Just joined in July. I have only made these two threads but I have posted in other threads several times. Screamer |
Screamer (OP) User ID: 45042546 United States 08/14/2013 09:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2269485 United States 08/14/2013 09:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Screamer (OP) User ID: 45042546 United States 08/14/2013 09:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Evidence of .pdf tampering with transcripts from Dzokhar Tsarnaev's arraignment hearing! May have been authored in 2006! ^Everyone knows that the official story is fake. I'm relatively new. Just joined in July. I have only made these two threads but I have posted in other threads several times. Quoting: Screamer I do not know the official story is fake. ? You're in the minority here Screamer |
Screamer (OP) User ID: 45042546 United States 08/14/2013 10:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Screamer (OP) User ID: 45042546 United States 08/14/2013 10:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Louve User ID: 44987396 United States 08/14/2013 10:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Evidence of .pdf tampering with transcripts from Dzokhar Tsarnaev's arraignment hearing! May have been authored in 2006! Unfortunately, I'm sure this will get shuffled away just like every other bit of confusing "evidence". I'll be looking forward to other mentions of this though as things continue. Good work OP, green and 5 for you! "Standing on a hill in my mountain of dreams, Telling myself it's not as hard, hard, hard as it seems." "see, that's there we differ. you can learn a lot more in the journey than in the destination." ~eekers "Benghazi. We remembered you". ~JypsieWind |
Kinect User ID: 44626146 United States 08/14/2013 11:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Evidence of .pdf tampering with transcripts from Dzokhar Tsarnaev's arraignment hearing! May have been authored in 2006! I think that TPTB does this type of thing on purpose. They know that someone out there will catch these "glitches." It's a manufactured laugh at us "pee-ons." Bastards they are! It's disinformation to create an agenda. Same as Obama's birth certificate. What are they really doing, besides diverting attention from what? Makes you think... "The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it." - Josef Mengele "You can't fix stupid" - Ron White "Whatever you do in life, leave it better than you found it." |
Screamer (OP) User ID: 45042546 United States 08/14/2013 11:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Evidence of .pdf tampering with transcripts from Dzokhar Tsarnaev's arraignment hearing! May have been authored in 2006! I think its a credible story and nice work on the OP's part. Quoting: Louve Unfortunately, I'm sure this will get shuffled away just like every other bit of confusing "evidence". I'll be looking forward to other mentions of this though as things continue. Good work OP, green and 5 for you! Thank you dear. BTW, I wasn't looking for stars. I was just annoyed at the one star, calling this bullshit, at the time =) I just wanted people to mull over this odd fact. Regarding credibility, one can go to CNN and the Wall street Journal, find the arraignment hearing transcript, and right click for document properties, and find the same thing. I have another theory than simply changing the creation date so it will be archived improperly, taking into account the Windows Home XP and the PDFFactory version. It was actually authored in 2006 (they had the idea of framing the kid when he was 12, and with all that planning people still suspect he is framed), by Uncle Ruslan in Graham Fuller's home (Damn, he must hate his sister-in-law ALOT). He figured in 2006, that by 2013, there would be some up-versions of PDFfactory, it being really hard to imagine how technology will change and all. Maybe all of the papers have had this document in their possession this whole time? Screamer |
wisc_natureboy User ID: 33824070 United States 08/14/2013 11:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Evidence of .pdf tampering with transcripts from Dzokhar Tsarnaev's arraignment hearing! May have been authored in 2006! OP, I think you will get along just fine around here. ;-`) Last Edited by wisc_natureboy on 08/14/2013 11:28 PM We all breathe the same air. .-.. --- ...- . / .- .-.. .-.. |
Screamer (OP) User ID: 45042546 United States 08/14/2013 11:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Evidence of .pdf tampering with transcripts from Dzokhar Tsarnaev's arraignment hearing! May have been authored in 2006! I think that TPTB does this type of thing on purpose. They know that someone out there will catch these "glitches." Quoting: Kinect It's a manufactured laugh at us "pee-ons." Bastards they are! It's disinformation to create an agenda. Same as Obama's birth certificate. What are they really doing, besides diverting attention from what? Makes you think... This is an interesting idea. Part of the whole divide and conquer psy-ops. Only one obscure czech site caught it. Also, what explains someone from the Wall Street journal finding this obscure site in Czech before the English translation came out, and within hours updating it with a modification date? Seems like alot of trouble to go through, when the story has so many holes. The main doubters are "conspiracy theorists" who are not the ones out protesting and teenage girls who no one takes seriously. Everyone else believes the official story hook line and sinker, so if this is a Divide and Conquer or diversion psy-op, it was done pretty shittily (which of course is possible) Screamer |
Screamer (OP) User ID: 45042546 United States 08/15/2013 12:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |