The biggest blunder in the church for years!! The Paul Deception!

NO, the REAL reason they won't let you add that is because it is BASELESS. For all its faults, even wikipedia has standards, including corroborating documentation from legitimate sources.

Show me, oh demanding one, where Jesus said the Sadducees couldn't even ask the question or asked the wrong question.

Partly a figure of speech , but if you are one of Christ's brothers?:

Luke 22:28 “However, YOU are the ones that have stuck+ with me in my trials;+Did their suffering Jesus' trials with him have a purpose? And is that purpose connected with what he says next? :
29 and I make a covenant with YOU, just as my Father has made a covenant+ with me, for a kingdom,+ 30 that YOU may eat+ and drink at my table in my kingdom,+ and sit on thrones+ to judge the twelve tribes of Israel.
Wouldn't they be more empathetic judges,observing and experiencing some of how much humans can suffer and endure?
31 “Simon, Simon, look! Satan+ has demanded to have YOU men to sift YOU as wheat.+ 32 But I have made supplication+ for you that your faith may not give out; and you, when once you have returned, strengthen+ your brothers.”

Isn't Jesus indicating that Peter's endurance will help him strengthen his brothers? Down to this day? His suffering will not be in vain.

Why is there to be "a body of Christ"? Is Christ "the head" and the "savior of this body" not sufficient?

You go girl!

And now I'm-a go sleep.

1. You are in error because you do not know the power of God, or
You are in error because you do not know the scriptures
2. Sadducees did not believe in resurrection
3. Sadducees gave him an example concerning the physical
resurrection of the dead, 7 brothers married to 1 woman.
4. Sadducees, who did not believe in resurrection, asked Jesus whose wife she will be upon resurrection
5. He confirms resurrection
He denies the resurrection to involve marriage
30At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven
6. He denies that they are dead to God. When He told Moses (after the physical deaths of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob) that "I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob" He was confirming that to God - Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were still living, not dead. Their physical bodies had long returned to the dust, but they themselves still lived.

We see this in the example and why Moses commanded that a brother of a dead man was to marry the widow and raise up children for his dead brother. The woman spiritually was one with the dead husband, and therefore any children born to the brother are still the dead brothers lineage. In this manner, as the author of creation, every person living in the 'mind' of God comes into this world. Just because one brother dies does not mean that his descendants do not come forth into the world. They do.

God is a God of the Living because like Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, at the time of Moses, long after their physical death, they still are living. He is still their God. And they will receive a new body, what that will be we do not know, but just as we see that Jesus showed a body after resurrection which was somehow different, those too in Christ will receive such.

And now I'm-a go sleep.

This was your question
"How did Paul's sufferings make up for what Christ's sufferings lacked, for me?"

He did not say that Christ's sufferings lacked.

He lacked them, in his flesh.

^Agreed. And this Paul is a liar stuff... What the.. why? Paul's entire life was dedicated to God to the best of his understanding and experience. So Paul lies to serve the God that has always and only said "You shall not lie."?! And Paul's lies are to tell us believe in Christ and serve each other! What a horrible liar! Absurd. Madness. I can only think they must be psychotic Jew-haters. What else is there?

Agree. Except they seem to be lovers of the law, just like the Pharisees, since they keep calling Paul an antinomian.

Psalm 68:11 Jehovah himself gives the saying;

The women telling the good news are a large army.

""let the women keep silence in the churches:"" Is GLP "the churches"? Are you, for instance, part of the "Congregation of God"? [It's possible I guess, but probably won't seem likely to some of us.]

"" When did the “people for special possession” begin to be formed into the Christian congregation? It was at Pentecost 33 C.E. when God poured out holy spirit on the disciples assembled in Jerusalem. Later that day, Peter gave a masterful discourse to a group of Jews and proselytes. Many were stabbed to the heart over Jesus’ death; they repented and were baptized. We find in the historical report that three thousand did so, thereupon becoming part of the new and growing congregation of God. (Acts 2:1-4, 14, 37-47) It was growing because more and more Jews and proselytes accepted the fact that fleshly Israel was no longer the congregation of God. Rather, anointed Christians constituting the spiritual “Israel of God” had become the true congregation of God.—Galatians 6:16; Acts 20:28.""
[link to wol.jw.org]

At Pentecost of 33 C.E. holy spirit was poured out on both men and women. In explanation, the apostle Peter quoted Joel 2:28, 29, saying: “‘In the last days,’ God says, ‘I shall pour out some of my spirit upon every sort of flesh, and your sons and your daughters will prophesy and your young men will see visions and your old men will dream dreams; and even upon my men slaves and upon my women slaves I will pour out some of my spirit in those days, and they will prophesy.’” (Acts 2:17, 18) In like manner today, women properly share in the Christian ministry, preaching from house to house and conducting home Bible studies." [link to wol.jw.org]

This is a public forum not "The Congregation" or "the churches" spoken of in the Bible.

I did not rearrange the statement, but merely pointed out that you are the one that keeps declaring that Paul;
"claims to make up for what Christ lacked in his sacrifice"

Paul is not saying that, so please stop accusing him of it

It says no such thing. It states that he is filling up on that which is lacking of Christ's affliction in his own flesh, for the sake of Christ's body, which is his church.

Surely if we are to die to the old man in order to be transformed into the image of Christ then that would be beneficial to the congregation.

Nobody is your enemy here. All of us can read something wrongly and later be corrected. I do, and am corrected. But I will tell you again, preconceived assumptions like already concluding that Paul is Satan WILL influence how you read a sentence. This verse is proof positive. An honest and humble appraisal by you will reveal it. I have one in my own family who rejects Paul. I can see the progression which happens. Everything and everyone eventually gets rejected. Paul, then Luke, then Peter, then James, then only the three gospels.....then Jesus Christ. They fall in love with Moses and can see nothing else. They say that the old wine is better.