PIN! WashingtonTimes: U.N. comes after America’s guns Barack Obama’s OK of a gun-control treaty would destroy the Second Amendment

Come and take it bitches in blue helmets...They will have a huge problem with this.

:BACK OFF:

All you fools pretending to be hard will be the first ones to fold. All you're capable of is feigning outrage online.

BULLSHIT. Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia are definitely *not* anti-gun. Over a million hunting permits issued in 2011 in those three states, alone. I don't have stats readily available on how many deer and other game were taken, but anecdotal evidence would suggest that somewhere between 30 and 50% of hunters are successful in taking at least one quarry in a given season - one hell of a "rebel force" to be reckoned with, just within 100 miles of the District of Criminals.

The phrase, "Good luck with that", immediately comes to mind.

Logistics alone will break any large force attempting to stay highly mobile in such an environment; and guerrilla tactics will destroy by attrition any force which tries to dig in and "hold ground". That's the rock and hard-place of asymmetrical warfare, particularly when there are no "rear areas" where supplies are safe, and where troops can get R&R.

Draw a circle with a radius of 50 miles centered on DC - a large enough force (figure 12,000-15,000 troops) can take that in about 10 days. It will likely cost: 400~600 casualties among the invading force, 40~50 vehicles destroyed, and ~40,000-60,000 gallons of fuel burned (in 10 days). The operation will require some 480,000 pounds of food, medicine, and other consumables to be delivered to the field; that's 48,000 pounds of deliveries every day, on time, to all forces, or the net of control will begin to fail after as little as 24 hours without replenishment.

Now, double that radius to 100 miles...securing and obtaining provisional control will take at least 10 weeks and 50,000 troops, and it will cost 1300~1800 casualties, about 200 vehicles destroyed, and 500,000 gallons of fuel burned (in 10 weeks). The operation will require some 14,000,000 pounds of food, medicine, and other consumables to be delivered to the field - about 1,400,000 pounds per week.

Double that radius to 200 miles, and it will take between 10 and 16 months to "pacify" that much area with roughly 150,000 troops. Casualties will be in the range of 12,000~20,000 per year, vehicle losses will be well over 2500 per year, this force will require over 14 million gallons of fuel per year to remain operational, and will also require ~260 Million pounds of food, medicine, and other consumables per year. That is 270,000 gallons of fuel, and 5,000,000 pounds of supplies per week!!! This is similar to what Exxon/Mobile and Wallmart deliver each week in the entire US market east of the Mississippi river!

These figures for fuel and consumables do *not* account for losses due to sabotage or "piracy" by rebels, and therefore may have to be increased as much as 15~25% or more durring an extended campaign, where networks of rebel forces coordinate against resupply operations.

All personnel, materials, and supplies will require continual replenishment to every field location. On time. Under combat conditions. If Exxon and Walmart couldn't do it, who do you think can?!?

And this is still not even 20% of the contiguous US territory under "control".

In short, without aiding factors it would be functionally impossible to control and disarm even 50% of the territory known as CONUS. That is why they are so desperately seeking aiding factors, like a natural disaster and/or a grid down type of game changer scenario.

Amateurs think tactics...professionals think logistics.

Contrary to idiots that spread rumours, international treaties do NOT trump the US constitution.

Contrary to idiots that spread rumours, international treaties do NOT trump the US constitution.

Since the first major U.N. meeting in July 2001, officially launching the so-called “Program of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects,” this bureaucratic behemoth on the banks of the East River in New York City has been attempting to stretch its tentacles into the domestic regulation of firearms. If the administration of President Obama signs the Arms Trade Treaty, the U.N. will have taken a major step toward its ultimate goal — regardless of whether the treaty is ever submitted to the Senate for ratification.

OHHHHhhHhhHhhhhhhhhh Ya TPTB are scared ......AND THEY FUCKING SHOULD BE......


Oh by the way.....:2222222:

Tell that to the democratically appointed judges.

Keep in mind that schools are already indoctrinating the children against guns, images of guns, chicken fingers that look like guns and thoughts about guns. It only took 20 to 30 years of indoctrinating the children to accept gays and their lifestyle and now look...we have gay marriage popping up just about everywhere, gays kissing on tv, celebrations of gay pride at Disney world, etc. So, don't look now, but these children will be voting before you know it and they will care less about the second amendment. Just like they could care less about marriage today.

Treaties require a 2/3 majority vote by the Senate in order to be ratified.

Basically this is another way to say megadeath. Because...that will be the result.

Smart, well thought out.

Precise and surgical.

No!

Smart, well thought out.

Precise and surgical.

Good fucking luck..

This has to be something they plan to implement post SHTF or something. No way in hell are even they stupid enough to think they can make this happen.

Nah...you get the l picture. It's pretty obvious at this point that the elite want us all to murder each other. That's it in a nutshell.

Seriously...why the fuck do they care if peasants have weapons? They really don't. They are like a giant machine...all they know is that taking firearms from Americans will break the rusty wire holding America in it's current civilized state. Never in the history of mankind has their been a brigade of armed "soldiers" as massive as America's armed folks. That is key here.

Come and take it bitches in blue helmets...They will have a huge problem with this.

:BACK OFF:

Think so? Smith, Wesson, Remington, and Springfield say "go ahead, make my day."



[link to www.youtube.com]

But, then, really, here's my neck of the woods:



[link to www.youtube.com]

Any fuck trying to disarm us will find out...

they will have us shoot our bullets at ourselves first,
then they can come in for the guns when the bullets are all gone.

that is the only way to take 300 million guns from 300 million people..

I understand all the "Treaties can't usurp the Constitution", and "congress will stop them", and "Obama would have a war on his hands if he does it". But what if he doesn't give a fuck and wants to speed up the clock on his totalitarian idea? What if he instigates this? What if by some god awful, they get this plan going? Don't dismiss the idea entirely, just believe that its improbable, not impossible.

Did anyone actually go and read the ATT? ( [link to treaties.un.org] I'm in no way a fan of UN or Barry nor defending their positions. I did read the ATT from the UN's website and I have a hard time seeing where this affects or is written to affect the Constitution and rights of American citizens.
Everything in the treaty itself appears to be addressing the import/export of conventional arms and munitions. The description of the 'national control system' is followed by 'to regulate the export of' in every statement. It states "For the purposes of this treaty, the activities of the international trade comprise export, import, transit, trans-shipment and brokering hereafter referred to as "transfer"". This doesn't infer "transfer" like FFL transfer.
I've read nothing that attempts to regulate a State's (which doesn't mean the individual United States, rather a UN member Party) internal National laws. It cannot regulate nor attempt to regulate a Parties national laws. It's attempting to regulate international weapons trade. I'm not here to argue; I'm 100% pro-gun. I just wanted to do the reading myself and see what the hub-bub was about. I find it hard to glean out of this document where anything that affects American citizens is implied, besides if you were trying to purchase arms from a foreign country.
If this is totally wrong, then please tell me. Believe me, I was just as pissed as the next guy reading the headline, but it didn't sound correct once I read it.
Don't get me wrong, I don't trust it but I'm not an attorney or the like so I may be missing something.
Now the International Small Arms Control Standards is a different ballgame, but the USA isn't listed as a member.
[link to www.smallarmsstandards.org]