Have you ever had a simple xray at the dentist's office? They put a lead apron on you and run like hell!!
Yet, men can live in a tin-can submarine filled with atom bombs and a reactor for months without any problem at all.
Quoting: Anonymous OP 45398914 Claims nuclear fission doesn't happen, doesn't know what types of radiation fission produces.
Check.
If atom bombs were real, a hundred would be all you would ever need.
Quoting: Anonymous OP 45398914 Begging the question.
What nation of idiots would allow their government to make 5,113 of these things to begin with. A paranoid one, for sure.
Quoting: Anonymous OP 45398914 Not an argument against the existence of nukes.
1. Is there any evidence that a thermonuclear device exploded over Hiroshima in 1945?
No, absolutely none. According to leading historians and physicists, the thermonuclear bomb was not invented until years after the supposed detonation over Japanese territory.
[
link to www.mit.edu]
2. Is there any evidence that a uranium-based "atom bomb" was ever dropped onto Nagasaki, Japan?
Absolutely not. While many historians and journalists made this claim in the late 40's and early 50's, everyone now agrees that no such bomb ever exploded over Nagasaki. Yet there are some who still stubbornly cling to this supposed "fact." ibid
That is the most transparent trollish strawman in the history of trollish strawmen.
NOBODY CLAIMS that a thermonuclear device exploded over Hiroshima!
NOBODY CLAIMS an uranium bomb was dropped on Nagasaki!
Who ever constructed that paragraph very deliberately lies to fool the ignorant.
Either a disinfo agent or a troll.
Face it folks, we have been had.
Some of you idiots actually Defend the Lie.
Quoting: Anonymous OP 45398914 Projection.
So far only you and your sock have told deliberate untruths and fabrications.
Are you an amateur disinformationist (i.e. troll), or are you supporting a more sinister agenda?
3. What are the materials needed to make an "atom bomb?"
Uranium-238 and plutonium-239.
Quoting: Anonymous OP 45398914 And HE, advanced electronics, steel, etc...
4. Aren't these materials radioactive?
Highly so. Anybody who attempts to use these materials is endangering his/her life.
[
link to www.mit.edu]
Begging the question.
Or even deliberately lying.
You are just repeating popular (and false) myths about radioactivity.
You are aware that the air you breath is radioactive?
That there are DIFFERENT TYPES of radiation?
That some of these have very little penetration power?
Well, them fellers on them atomic submarines ain't got no problem being around this stuff 24/7.
These fat fuckers in uniform are handling it with their bare hands. Scroll down and check out the picture and get a laugh.
[
link to heiwaco.tripod.com]
Why are you lying, Mr. Björkman?
They are not handling uranium or plutonium with their bare hands, they are handling a
metal box.
Isn't it time to Wake Up?
Quoting: Anonymous OP 45398914 Isn't it time for you to fess up!
"Hello everyone, my name is Anonymous. I am a troll."
You have not looked at any of the evidence.
Quoting: Anonymous OP 45398914 You haven't presented any.
Actual evidence would be in the nature off: a demonstration of the alternate physics that prohibits fission, testimony of some of the millions involved in the hoax, physical evidence that a historical nuclear explosion wasn't nuclear, etc.
As a nut, I can ask certain questions that normal everyday sane folks cannot address.
Quoting: Anonymous OP 45398914 However, you JAQing off will not proof any of your claims.
Question 1- If atom bombs are terribly destructive, what kind of society would build five to ten thousand or more?
Quoting: Anonymous OP 45398914 The kind of society that did.
Wouldn't just a couple of hundred be sufficient?
Quoting: Anonymous OP 45398914 Sufficient for what?
Question 2- If atom bombs are majorly radioactive and you should not be near them, how come men in submarines can hang out with them 24/7 without a problem?
Quoting: Anonymous OP 45398914 Begging the question.
Atom bombs aren't "majorly radioactive".
(Until they explode.)
Maybe we could ask Jimmy Carter. He was a nuclear engineer on a sub. Reckon ole Jimmy would cough up the truth. Did not seem to hurt him hanging out with nukes, he be an old man now and very healthy.
Quoting: Anonymous OP 45398914 Don't say maybe, do it.
I'm sure Mr. Carter's office has an email address.
Question 3- Bunker Buster Bombs, we hear a lot about them. How much do these motherfuckers cost the taxpayers?
Quoting: Anonymous OP 45398914 Read the appropriations.
If a 'suitcase nuke' will take out a whole city, why spent trillions of Bunker Busters?
Quoting: Anonymous OP 45398914 More begging of questions.
A suitcase nuke will not "take out a whole city", they are tactical demolition devices.
Nobody spent "trillions" on bunker busters.
For the military it is always nice to have a number of options, and sometimes you just want to keep your war conventional.
OPTIONAL QUESTION
Why the Fuck does France need atom bombs?
Quoting: Anonymous OP 45398914 Why don't you ask them.
It is blatantly apparent that you are so completely and utterly ignorant of post-WWII geopolitical history that just TRYING to explain that one question to you would take a 3-hour lecture.
If you are confused by a subject read some books about it, ask (polite) questions at the appropriate forums, take some time to think about it.
Just thinking "I don't understand any of that therefore EVIL™!" isn't the Way of the rational freethinker.
