Do NUCLEAR BOMBS really exist or are they simply a bomb with a great VISUAL EFFECT, made for propaganda reasons and to scare you silly?

Radiation is extremely dangerous.

Heiwa is a loon.

[link to www.rerf.jp]

I look forward to you posting them.

.

Last Edited by Lamplite on 08/31/2013 02:51 AM

I would give my insight, but not on a "Let's hate Israel" and "Free Palestine" crap thread.


Any chance to make thread WITHOUT blaming Israel because you have a small dick?

Last Edited by Recollector on 08/31/2013 02:54 AM

What the hell are you talking about?

Firstly, I have not even mentioned Israel and secondly I don't have a dick as I am a woman.

You aren't Heiwa? You've been linking him a lot.

No, and haven't I only linked one of his pages?

for discussion.

Yeah, the huge sucking wind heard here.

I have now checked into "Thorium" interesting thanks.
.

A lamplite thread thats not about slandering God????????? I need a long hard reflection to decipher the hidden intentions here.

If we could focus millions on volts of electricity, wireless, to a fine point......a tremendous explosion happens.

Tesla caused the Tunguska Event. He was conducting a show of power to a general in the northern Canadian area. Tesla's lab, the general, the North Pole and Tunguska ground zero all line up.

It wasn't long after that what happened was figured out and weaponized.

Unless we are all to believe the US told the Russians how to do it. Oh yeah, splitting atoms. Kinda would think that would be top secret information. Which leads to believe it is propaganda disinformation.

Nuclear Weapons could very well be high energy weapons and the transmitter is HAARP. Focus the energy to a small point, kaboom.

All in theory anyways.....

I think that Russian got info about the Atomic Bomb during WWII remember we were allies during the war.

Naw.

The physics of it was out in the open. Not that a lot of people understood it, but most of the developed nations had enough scientists who understood the basics to have started their own program.

Germans were going pretty strong. They lost a lot of top scientists early on in the war, but there were a few that stayed. Like, say, Heisenberg.

In fact, the Allies were worried enough about the German atom bomb project they went out of their way to sabotage a heavy-water plant in Norway. (In the hindsight of history, they actually needn't have bothered).

Uncle Joe couldn't do much during the war -- he kind of had other things on his mind -- but Klaus Fuchs and others were right there at Los Alamos, feeding technical information back to the Soviet Union.

Not that they didn't have several very capable scientists of their own. Their main problem was getting enough material together for the first shots. Getting their hands on nuclear material from the Nazi atom bomb project gave them an early boost, though.

It wasn't until four years after Trinity that the Soviets fired their first shot. But it only took another two years for them to move on to thermonuclear devices.

Err, sorry. The Soviet's RDS-2 was a boosted fission bomb, without an actual fusion component.

The DEFINITION of "boosted fission bomb" is USES FUSION FOR BOOSTING.

"Fusion boosting is a technique for increasing the efficiency of a small light weight fission bomb by introducing a modest amount of deuterium- tritium mixture (typically containing 2-3 g of tritium) inside the fission core. As the fission chain reaction proceeds and the core temperature rises at some point the fusion reaction begins to occur at a significant rate. This reaction injects fusion neutrons into the core, causing the neutron population to rise faster than it would from fission alone (that is, the effective value of alpha increases)."
[link to nuclearweaponarchive.org]

The Pacific atolls where bombs were tested wouldn't be uninhabitable these days if the bombs weren't for real.

Just ask all those folks who can't go back to their home lands about radioactive fallout and such.

Yeah, I know. WHat I meant is, not a fusion stage like a Got caught in a mess of emails elsewhere and not taking the time to write clear.

Is basically a neutron booster. i think that's why people draw the line; the fusion process itself doesn't add significantly to the energy output of the weapon.

At least, i think that's the technical reason we don't call the boosted-fission guys "hydrogen bombs." besides the different construction, of course.

Wow, that comment got ate by the forum gremlin.

What I meant to say was it is not a separate fusion stage. I know the D-T is fusing, because how else are you getting more neutrons out of it?

Watch this film on Chernobyl, it puts into perspective how dangerous and poisonous radiation is or IS NOT.



Intense radiation poisoning makes your skin turn black, but we are talking about massive amounts.

The man in charge in the control room "Dyatlov" had been exposed in a previous accident to 200 rm and lived. That is three life times worth of radiation and then in this accident he received a further 390 rm and yet he lived on. He eventually died of a heart attack in his old age.

Everyone who died had received this amount or more. Surprisingly one man who was in the reactor room itself got over his radiation burns and sickness to live on.

In all only 31 people died.

Over 600,000 men and woman were made to clean that mess up. Bury that crap, and many had no protective clothing what-so-ever.

50 tons of radiation was released into the atmosphere. 10x what "supposedly" was released in Hiroshima.

700 tons of radiative graphite was blown around the plant.

Although experts predicted at least 70,000 people would die from an increased incidence of cancer in and around Russia, that has proved not to be the case. The only proven link has been an increase of thyroid cancer in children, how much higher this incidence is was not stated.

This film itself was actually shot on location at Chernobyl, in a different part of the plant.

You can now take tours to Chernobyl, walk right up to the plant.

Last Edited by Lamplite on 09/01/2013 06:42 AM

"When the Chernobyl nuclear reactor exploded in 1986, experts predicted as many as 40,000 extra cancer deaths from the radiation spewed onto parts of what was then the Soviet Union."


[link to www.slate.com]

Yes but between what propaganda states and what actually happens is a huge gap.

It never happened.



Last Edited by Lamplite on 09/01/2013 06:39 AM

for discussion.

so know Chernobyl didn't happen???

is easter real?

Water wall sound blubber in brick ... Also not + one big poo valley was also good.

interesting semantics, pausing to grok.

Oh come on ... I have already explained in detail that nuclear reactors are real and why the science for them is correct, when it is not correct for a nuclear bomb. (second post).

I also posted a video on the Chernobyl disaster. (end of previous page) which shows that radiation although poisonous in huge doses, is not that poisonous in smaller ones.
.