| Users Online Now: 2,107 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,385,888 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,293,824 | Threads Today: 868 | Posts Today: 15,594 |
| 10:12 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,107 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,385,888 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,293,824 | Threads Today: 868 | Posts Today: 15,594 |
| 10:12 PM | ||
any loggers in the house? | |
| EVIL_BEAN_KID Offer Upgrade  User ID: 46097447  United States08/31/2013 10:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| BRIEF User ID: 39607259 United States08/31/2013 11:02 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i have a question for anyone experienced with logging pro or homesteader. Quoting: EVIL_BEAN_KID log arch, why doesnt anybody make one with the lifting point forward of the axle so there is more weight on the rear axle of the atv/tractor? thanx in advance. Not sure what you are talking about, but when loading a trailer you don't want the bulk of the weight behind the axle, because it can result is fishtailing and jackknifing. I never forgive and I never forget I am a licensed firearm holder. I will, under protection of law, use lethal force if attacked.  |
| EVIL_BEAN_KID (OP) User ID: 46097447 United States08/31/2013 11:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | i have a question for anyone experienced with logging pro or homesteader. Quoting: EVIL_BEAN_KID log arch, why doesnt anybody make one with the lifting point forward of the axle so there is more weight on the rear axle of the atv/tractor? thanx in advance. Not sure what you are talking about, but when loading a trailer you don't want the bulk of the weight behind the axle, because it can result is fishtailing and jackknifing. no no no. log arch: they are all almost exactly the same. but you see the lifting point is over the axle so the tongue weight would be next to nothing. so why not move the lifting point forward so there is at least some of the weight of the log on the trailer tongue for aded traction for the pulling machine? SLAM THAT CLAM |
