What If The Point Of Getting U.S. To Attack Syria Is To Start WWIII---And Take The U.S. Down? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38567483 United States 09/05/2013 03:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wondering what you all think of this possibility: let's say I was president and let's say I really didn't like what we were about. Let's say my aim was to deconstruct and diminish the country--that my true agenda was to take the U.S. down. Let's also say that I sympathized with the MB. So, getting U.S. into Syria could plausibly give the Russians and possibly the Chinese grounds to attack the U.S. as they are allies of Assad. Maybe the whole point of rushing us into a conflict with Syria is far more nefarious than merely empowering the MB. maybe it's to hand us over on a platter. Quoting: telling it straight Just a speculation....what do you think? That IS THE POINT |
Baconspiracist User ID: 27008657 Germany 09/05/2013 03:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wondering what you all think of this possibility: let's say I was president and let's say I really didn't like what we were about. Let's say my aim was to deconstruct and diminish the country--that my true agenda was to take the U.S. down. Let's also say that I sympathized with the MB. So, getting U.S. into Syria could plausibly give the Russians and possibly the Chinese grounds to attack the U.S. as they are allies of Assad. Maybe the whole point of rushing us into a conflict with Syria is far more nefarious than merely empowering the MB. maybe it's to hand us over on a platter. Quoting: telling it straight Just a speculation....what do you think? That IS THE POINT Believe Nothing - Question Everything |
72Pantera User ID: 4740688 United States 09/05/2013 03:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wondering what you all think of this possibility: let's say I was president and let's say I really didn't like what we were about. Let's say my aim was to deconstruct and diminish the country--that my true agenda was to take the U.S. down. Let's also say that I sympathized with the MB. So, getting U.S. into Syria could plausibly give the Russians and possibly the Chinese grounds to attack the U.S. as they are allies of Assad. Maybe the whole point of rushing us into a conflict with Syria is far more nefarious than merely empowering the MB. maybe it's to hand us over on a platter. Quoting: telling it straight Just a speculation....what do you think? Not speculation - its the truth! ***Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master ~George Washington*** |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42888511 Australia 09/05/2013 04:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wondering what you all think of this possibility: let's say I was president and let's say I really didn't like what we were about. Let's say my aim was to deconstruct and diminish the country--that my true agenda was to take the U.S. down. Let's also say that I sympathized with the MB. So, getting U.S. into Syria could plausibly give the Russians and possibly the Chinese grounds to attack the U.S. as they are allies of Assad. Quoting: telling it straight Maybe the whole point of rushing us into a conflict with Syria is far more nefarious than merely empowering the MB. maybe it's to hand us over on a platter. Just a speculation....what do you think? "ding" "ding" you win the prize. |
Halo2Alexis™ User ID: 45982387 United States 09/05/2013 04:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46321237 United States 09/05/2013 04:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46339752 United Kingdom 09/05/2013 04:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | russia and china specifically have been prepping for sometime... its a bluff... its is orchestrated as they know the world to look to the US to act... after all the bluster the US have been backed into a corner... as if they back down they are sending the wrong message and if they act they are playing into their hands... catch 22... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46340252 Canada 09/05/2013 05:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wondering what you all think of this possibility: let's say I was president and let's say I really didn't like what we were about. Let's say my aim was to deconstruct and diminish the country--that my true agenda was to take the U.S. down. Let's also say that I sympathized with the MB. So, getting U.S. into Syria could plausibly give the Russians and possibly the Chinese grounds to attack the U.S. as they are allies of Assad. Maybe the whole point of rushing us into a conflict with Syria is far more nefarious than merely empowering the MB. maybe it's to hand us over on a platter. Quoting: telling it straight Just a speculation....what do you think? That IS THE POINT ^^^--This. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46336840 Hong Kong 09/05/2013 06:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "What If The Point Of Getting U.S. To Attack Syria Is To Start WWIII---And Take The U.S. Down?" What? Would that SURPRISE you? The immediate point is to remove competition around Israel. And longer term, to do whatever suits Israel, and the hidden devils that really control her. For them, if that means "taking down the US", then So-Be-It ! Check this out : Thread: The GRAND PLAN of the New Axis Powers |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7043823 United States 09/05/2013 07:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wondering what you all think of this possibility: let's say I was president and let's say I really didn't like what we were about. Let's say my aim was to deconstruct and diminish the country--that my true agenda was to take the U.S. down. Let's also say that I sympathized with the MB. So, getting U.S. into Syria could plausibly give the Russians and possibly the Chinese grounds to attack the U.S. as they are allies of Assad. Quoting: telling it straight Maybe the whole point of rushing us into a conflict with Syria is far more nefarious than merely empowering the MB. maybe it's to hand us over on a platter. Just a speculation....what do you think? This has been a though in the back of my head. Nice op |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 35410860 United States 09/05/2013 07:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43901661 Netherlands 09/05/2013 07:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wondering what you all think of this possibility: let's say I was president and let's say I really didn't like what we were about. Let's say my aim was to deconstruct and diminish the country--that my true agenda was to take the U.S. down. Let's also say that I sympathized with the MB. So, getting U.S. into Syria could plausibly give the Russians and possibly the Chinese grounds to attack the U.S. as they are allies of Assad. Quoting: telling it straight Maybe the whole point of rushing us into a conflict with Syria is far more nefarious than merely empowering the MB. maybe it's to hand us over on a platter. Just a speculation....what do you think? |
DTK User ID: 45916692 United States 09/05/2013 07:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think that explanation is what they want everyone to believe. My intuition (from a military perspective) is screaming there is more to this. While everyone is worried about WWIII, there will be no one looking up. Boots on the ground means eyes on the ground and tuned into the reprogram your brain box. We all stopped watching tv. That means they need something you would be willing to watch so that they have access to you again. Everyone that I am meeting in the park is saying "wow, I never noticed that. too busy." Their busy is an illusion. Most of them are just spending too much time doing what their elite want them too...tv and shop. I need to compile the couple of pics I have showing the atmosphere crunch. No one looks up. Thread: I do not believe Syria and the Nukes are the issue....Wag the Dog in the House |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1580604 United States 09/05/2013 08:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46302849 Germany 09/05/2013 08:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46300957 United States 09/05/2013 08:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46200558 United States 09/05/2013 08:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16604126 Philippines 09/05/2013 08:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17872690 United States 09/05/2013 08:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36669228 Canada 09/05/2013 08:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There is however one flaw in your statement. iF the US truly were the most powerful player then it couldn't be forced into an illegal war. The US is now simply the biggest bully, it's being used by Israel simply for its man power (definitely not its brains, it has acted as a mindless entity since The Bushes came to power.) The end game seems to be depopulation. All China needs to do is call in the US debt to bring down the US. Who are they trying to impress with a war? The sheeple? |
just residing here User ID: 24071670 Bulgaria 09/05/2013 08:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | why don't you look at it from non-american perspective. From the perspective of the other 7 bln people who desperately need a new kind of world to live in. I am afraid WW3 is imminent at that point. But it might be more or less devastating. That "more or less" is the difference between life and death on the planet we call home. Should all nukes go off, the survivors might be in the millions. Does America want that and work for that? I think the answer is NO. |
SaveUSa User ID: 37256203 United States 09/05/2013 08:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wondering what you all think of this possibility: let's say I was president and let's say I really didn't like what we were about. Let's say my aim was to deconstruct and diminish the country--that my true agenda was to take the U.S. down. Let's also say that I sympathized with the MB. So, getting U.S. into Syria could plausibly give the Russians and possibly the Chinese grounds to attack the U.S. as they are allies of Assad. Quoting: telling it straight Maybe the whole point of rushing us into a conflict with Syria is far more nefarious than merely empowering the MB. maybe it's to hand us over on a platter. Just a speculation....what do you think? This has been a though in the back of my head. Nice op It has been a thought in the front of my head since about 2008. Now I understand that it isn't just Obama. He is but one piece of the puzzle. Last Edited by SaveUSa on 09/05/2013 08:25 AM Within the surreal depths of "reality" lies the truth. |
SaveUSa User ID: 37256203 United States 09/05/2013 08:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | why don't you look at it from non-american perspective. From the perspective of the other 7 bln people who desperately need a new kind of world to live in. I am afraid WW3 is imminent at that point. But it might be more or less devastating. That "more or less" is the difference between life and death on the planet we call home. Should all nukes go off, the survivors might be in the millions. Does America want that and work for that? I think the answer is NO. Final war will be conventional (maybe with a bit of biological and chemical) thrown in to spice things up). No nukes. Within the surreal depths of "reality" lies the truth. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45994527 United States 09/05/2013 08:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Damn stupid idea. China are bag holders of US bonds, contracts and exports and any action means they flush several trillion down the toilet and collapse economically. China can't do shit and are in the same game as the rest...get real. Dumbass! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46261358 United States 09/05/2013 08:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2026518 Canada 09/05/2013 08:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46176056 United States 09/05/2013 08:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm glad people are catching on to this. This is why the Nobel peace prize was bestowed on him. It gave him credentials as an internationalist. The only way to get the U.S. to agree to place the UN above our own sovereignty is to have a Trojan Horse President lead us on a crusade in the Middle East that results in a bloody regional war. The cost in lives and economic disruption will make us agree to surrender to the UN terms. The mystery wrapped in an enigma is the internationalist nuclear cowboy. We are set up to fail militarily and to fail economically. Next up is to raise the debt limit to 100 trillion. We're on an out of control ride at Dr. Satan's amusement park, folks. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40731538 Netherlands 09/05/2013 08:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wondering what you all think of this possibility: let's say I was president and let's say I really didn't like what we were about. Let's say my aim was to deconstruct and diminish the country--that my true agenda was to take the U.S. down. Let's also say that I sympathized with the MB. So, getting U.S. into Syria could plausibly give the Russians and possibly the Chinese grounds to attack the U.S. as they are allies of Assad. Quoting: telling it straight Maybe the whole point of rushing us into a conflict with Syria is far more nefarious than merely empowering the MB. maybe it's to hand us over on a platter. Just a speculation....what do you think? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 36848116 United States 09/05/2013 08:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | russia and china specifically have been prepping for sometime... its a bluff... its is orchestrated as they know the world to look to the US to act... after all the bluster the US have been backed into a corner... as if they back down they are sending the wrong message and if they act they are playing into their hands... catch 22... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 46339752 This is because the US administration is a bunch of amateurs and have their puppet strings pulled by Israel. Russia and China are run by professionals for the benefit of their own interests and not those of a much smaller country who runs the show like our government is. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30598499 United States 09/05/2013 08:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "What If The Point Of Getting U.S. To Attack Syria Is To Start WWIII---And Take The U.S. Down?" What if?? Bwhahaha! When there's war there's money to be made!! There's weapons to be sold to various sides. There's cut through negotiations to be made at the end of the fighting for rights to resources or god knows what but it will involve some form of wealth. Corporatocracy rules the day bro.... You can market it however you like as "WWIII" but honestly no one will actually declare war...Today we only deal in CONFLICTS because what I described above would be grounds for TREASON for all the American who would be selling the world arms and what not. Jus sayin' but yes Corporatcracy rules the day... Still need a clue without going full bore conspiracy? |