Yep...

He asked if she was aware of 'any' transfer of something to South Carolina, and she said 'you want to know if there was a 'weapons' transfer...'


How much clearer can this be?

Except, it is still possible that Dyess is well aware of the content of the current 'rumors', leading the operator to simply 'add' the word 'weapons' based upon the content of similar calls she has since had to answer.


So, this may not have been a 'slip of the tongue' after-all.


I am only saying this because we must keep our wits about us when trying to discern what actually happened. We must consider all possible scenarios without jumping to simple conclusions.

And I agree that the casual mention of an alleged terrorist threat by a senator is illogical...as is the casual mention of 16 B-2 bombers 'gone missing'.

-------------
It appears there may be some sophomoric attempts at psychological warfare going on, either by design, or, immature rendering.

If this IS an attempt to scare us, how dumbed-down do they think we are?

It also appears that WE are now left to operate largely on intuition...which means that all cards seem to be on the table, while each of us 'sees' different ones.

Crazy.