Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,521 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,865,018
Pageviews Today: 2,648,055Threads Today: 614Posts Today: 12,332
06:47 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

wow wtf GIANT UFO Around The Sun,Sept 5, 2013

 
Dr. AstroModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 33360181
United States
09/08/2013 09:14 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: wow wtf GIANT UFO Around The Sun,Sept 5, 2013
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Thanks. Just for the record - I don't believe this explanation.
 Quoting: Aye-aye


I don't care; just for the record, I'm right.


Last Edited by Dr. Astro on 09/08/2013 09:15 AM
astrobanner2
Aye-aye

User ID: 21993314
Bulgaria
09/08/2013 09:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: wow wtf GIANT UFO Around The Sun,Sept 5, 2013
That's what you say.
Aye-aye
One-Eye

User ID: 46506690
United States
09/08/2013 09:20 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: wow wtf GIANT UFO Around The Sun,Sept 5, 2013
...


Any input on this one?

...

 Quoting: Aye-aye

[/youtube]
[link to youtu.be]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Thanks. Just for the record - I don't believe this explanation.
 Quoting: Aye-aye


I don't care; just for the record, I'm right.

 Quoting: Dr. Astro


you could be left?
ADO

User ID: 44596398
Chile
09/08/2013 10:11 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: wow wtf GIANT UFO Around The Sun,Sept 5, 2013
...


Any input on this one?

...

 Quoting: Aye-aye

[/youtube]
[link to youtu.be]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Thanks. Just for the record - I don't believe this explanation.
 Quoting: Aye-aye


I don't care; just for the record, I'm right.

 Quoting: Dr. Astro


I saw the video, and this is not related to this thread. In this case you said this shadow is the result of a previous image of a planet (mercury) on the same position 15 days before. Wich is odd, but you show it, so it is possible, but also could be a coincidence. The question is, is there another example of this CCD shadow planetary calibration before? Another question, why the image you use to calibrate is worst quality than you are calibrating?
ADO
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 46512507
United Kingdom
09/08/2013 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: wow wtf GIANT UFO Around The Sun,Sept 5, 2013
This criat of mongas is of redule and sandpot, the lay of the suck is by far jinksten
Dr. AstroModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 33360181
United States
09/08/2013 11:18 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: wow wtf GIANT UFO Around The Sun,Sept 5, 2013
...

[/youtube]
[link to youtu.be]
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


Thanks. Just for the record - I don't believe this explanation.
 Quoting: Aye-aye


I don't care; just for the record, I'm right.

 Quoting: Dr. Astro


I saw the video, and this is not related to this thread. In this case you said this shadow is the result of a previous image of a planet (mercury) on the same position 15 days before. Wich is odd, but you show it, so it is possible, but also could be a coincidence. The question is, is there another example of this CCD shadow planetary calibration before? Another question, why the image you use to calibrate is worst quality than you are calibrating?
 Quoting: ADO


Yes to the first question, I've encountered this exact same thing before but to be honest SOHO annoys me and I don't feel particularly inspired to go find another instance. To the second question, what do you mean? The image I'm comparing to is already calibrated. It's analogous to the STEREO images discussed above; the raw fits files do not show the heliosphere at all prior to calibration, just a lot of glare from the sun. Here's what I mean, this is what an uncalibrated coronograph image looks like (this one from STEREO):
rawcorbeacon
No heliosphere, plenty of solar glare. They then use raw frames from a previous day to calibrate the current raw frame. The end result are the jpgs you see online. For the purpose of showing that it's just Mercury I'm comparing post-calibrated images to post-calibrated images, but you can still see it's a match.
astrobanner2
Dr. AstroModerator
Forum Moderator

User ID: 33360181
United States
09/08/2013 11:20 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: wow wtf GIANT UFO Around The Sun,Sept 5, 2013
That's what you say.
 Quoting: Aye-aye


Yes, yes it is. I have yet to hear a substantive argument that I'm wrong, let alone one that withstands any amount of scrutiny.
astrobanner2
ozymandias

User ID: 46236273
United States
09/08/2013 11:27 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: wow wtf GIANT UFO Around The Sun,Sept 5, 2013
is that the andromedan biosphere????? yeah , here come tolec right on time , yippy!!!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 36182365
United States
09/08/2013 04:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: wow wtf GIANT UFO Around The Sun,Sept 5, 2013
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1634496
United States
09/08/2013 04:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: wow wtf GIANT UFO Around The Sun,Sept 5, 2013
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


So they use 3-4 day old imagery to calibrate?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 46464210


For the stereo spacecraft the situation is more complex; it's more like a running average, so it takes longer to work itself out when something changes with the particles on the lens.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


:nut::nut::nut:
:nut::nut::nut:
:nut::nut::nut:
 Quoting: One-Eye


I Laika your collection of SpacePups!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31691726
United Kingdom
09/08/2013 05:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: wow wtf GIANT UFO Around The Sun,Sept 5, 2013
its my uncle and his fancy piece

News