Who Is Responsible For 9-11-01?

Moose Lodge?

:thumbsup:

I need a new avatar, I'm gettin sick of looking at the homo in mine.

For sure.. Jimmy Carter also comes to mind. It's just a mess we're paying/funding/supporting/importing our own demise!

Last Edited by ceawaves on 09/10/2013 02:04 PM

I like it

Israel did 9/11 - ALL THE PROOF IN THE WORLD
[link to theinfounderground.com]

Try to debunk that, Jew-lover.

I tried posting in your nazi thread this morning, but it was locked...I could not.

and the fact that muslims bragged about it means nothing to you?

even though i hate bin laden, and he deserves to burn in hell for what he did to the afghanis, but i just can't believe a guy literally living in a cave would be responsible for such calculated act. why did they dump his body in the sea ?!!! something stinks to the high heavens

So many plausible players and so many undeniable inconsistencies and odd coincidences. I don’t think we will ever have proof of exactly who was the ultimate mastermind. I think it is a combination of several in that list… a “conspiracy” if you will.

Me neither...I'm gonna have to look into that.

What's new, Comedian?

debunk it? I am not even going to waste my time reading it...

The names are all coming out through investigations, so they need WWIII now to cover their tracks.

It's a risk for them to create WWIII, but one I'm sure they have no problem going forward with, considering the alternatives.

Other!

The media would be the most accurate answer, but I suppose they are affiliated with the banking cartels.

Never forget the media showed you fake videos of cgi plane crashes!

In all of the impact footage, notably the Hezarkhani, Luc Courchesne, Carmen Taylor, Spiegel TV and Evan Fairbanks footage we see the plane entering the steel tower like a ghost without any part of it breaking which is absolutely impossible. This is cartoon physics. A passenger jet is a hollow aluminum and plastic tube which is highly vulnerable to impacts with flying birds. [link to imageshack.us] It is impossible for fragile mostly hollow aluminum wings to slice through the 14 inch steel beams of the WTC and also leave a perfect imprint. The wings would break off immediately upon contact. The planes were depicted as being inside and intact the Twin Towers, a pair of buildings made with 200,000 tons of steel each. [link to imageshack.us] When the tip of the plane’s fuselage hits the steel exterior of the South Tower the fuselage should be breaking up. [link to i581.photobucket.com] That would cause the wings to break off. From the holes left in both towers after “impact” we are supposed to believe the wings cut through the steel beams but this is simply impossible. The hole is the full length of the wingspan but not only is it impossible for the wings to have cut through the steel columns but it is absolutely impossible for the fragile wing tips to have also cut through the steel columns. [link to imageshack.us] An airplane wing can be sliced in half by a wooden telephone pole so how could it possibly hope to cut through steel? [link to www.youtube.com]

Isaac Newton’s Third Law of Motion: “For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.” High school physics states that the force an airplane exerts on a building is the same as the force a building exerts on an airplane. Let’s apply Newton’s Third Law to Flight 175. In the 9/11 story, Flight 175 strikes the South Tower at 450 m.p.h. Now imagine that the South Tower moved at 450 m.p.h. and struck a stationary Flight 175. We would not expect that Flight 175 would be undamaged. We would not expect that it would simply disappear into the South Tower. Any video that shows an aluminum airplane with a plastic nosecone gliding through a steel/concrete building violates Newton’s Laws of Motion. The plane did not slow down as it made contact with the tower. How can the plane fly at the same speed through the WTC as it did through the air? This is impossible according to laws of physics. As the alleged plane made contact with the tower there was no bending, buckling or breaking of the plane. No wings breaking or other parts of the plane breaking apart. It cartoonishly melts into the side of the tower like a knife through butter. [link to img159.imageshack.us]

sure they would have, it was such an important calculated attack on the most powerful country in the world, at the world's most important city. muslims always brag

They were not CGI images of plane crashes. I personally know someone who was shopping near the towers that morning and saw the 2nd plane.

as long as we have an iron in the fire we will always be involved.

other than our national interests (keeping oil flowing out of the region) I dont see a reason at all why any, Israel included, country in the ME should receive any of our support or attention.

Again I must agree.

i think every single spook agency on the planet had a hand in it.

What cave...? He didn't always live in a cave. The only reason that 911 worked was the simplicity of the plot. Our security services give the terrorist far too much credit and over prepare for an attack when all it takes is a little imagination...

911 was successful for them because it was not the least bit complicated.

Zionist bankers and Neo cons

Well said bud.

the charade is all going to come crashing down one day

it has to

and most of us will probably be alive to see it

When you have people accusing politicians like McCain of being a traitor to his face on camera, you know they are going to have to do something really big to take attention away from themselves.

I think W has serious daddy issues. He's not a moron, but those sorts of complex emotional entanglements are powerful and can definitely influence behavior.

Just MHO.

Last Edited by *Rhombus* on 09/10/2013 02:14 PM