Navy Yard shooting Announced hours ahead of actual event?? | |
chazbone (OP) User ID: 20451469 United States 09/18/2013 05:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's the time stamp: Monday, 16 September 2013 23:31 Eric Tucker And Brett Zongker, The Associated Press Print PDF so if I'm reading this correctly which I do not know if I am, this was released at 11 pm the night before correct? Thanks! Sorry if I'm missing something obvious - need help! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47068671 United States 09/18/2013 05:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's the time stamp: Quoting: chazbone Monday, 16 September 2013 23:31 Eric Tucker And Brett Zongker, The Associated Press Print PDF so if I'm reading this correctly which I do not know if I am, this was released at 11 pm the night before correct? Thanks! Sorry if I'm missing something obvious - need help! date and time stamp means it was released at 11:31 PM monday night...that's after the event |
GetchaPull! User ID: 43543612 United States 09/18/2013 05:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
chazbone (OP) User ID: 20451469 United States 09/18/2013 05:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
chazbone (OP) User ID: 20451469 United States 09/18/2013 05:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Cowherder Stop the inanity! User ID: 7559314 United States 09/18/2013 05:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | glad i printed hard-copies yesterday. Repeal the 17th Amendment and the Reapportionment Act of 1929! Thread: First steps down the road to a return to the Constitutional Republic that we were intended to be. Restore the Republic. Thread: The Bill of Rights does NOT include age requirements! It's a flower, not something to be feared. - Moo! |
chazbone (OP) User ID: 20451469 United States 09/18/2013 05:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
way2wyrd User ID: 47002357 United Kingdom 09/18/2013 06:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Digital mix guy User ID: 46317311 United States 09/18/2013 06:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MuskMan User ID: 32665410 United States 09/18/2013 06:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
chazbone (OP) User ID: 20451469 United States 09/18/2013 06:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
PigsInSpace User ID: 43479059 Canada 09/18/2013 06:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So need some help here. Friend brought this to my attention from another site that shall remain nameless. Quoting: chazbone And wanted our expert GLP opinion. [link to www.kelownadailycourier.ca] read the time stamp on that article...does this add up? I'm not good with military time. Thanks guys! Guys, don't you think if the government wanted to stage a shooting, that they would not release damning information a day before it occurred? Why would they expose themselves this way? I read about incorrect time stamps online before and it has something to do with cache issues. Last Edited by PigsInSpace on 09/18/2013 06:40 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 46630169 Canada 09/18/2013 06:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 41812239 United States 09/18/2013 06:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Manhattan User ID: 40023107 United States 09/18/2013 07:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The exception being if you see a memorial facebook page for a victim created the day before they died. |
chazbone (OP) User ID: 20451469 United States 09/18/2013 07:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So need some help here. Friend brought this to my attention from another site that shall remain nameless. Quoting: chazbone And wanted our expert GLP opinion. [link to www.kelownadailycourier.ca] read the time stamp on that article...does this add up? I'm not good with military time. Thanks guys! Guys, don't you think if the government wanted to stage a shooting, that they would not release damning information a day before it occurred? Why would they expose themselves this way? I read about incorrect time stamps online before and it has something to do with cache issues. The "drill" may have gone live earlier and postponed or maybe someone got a wrong tip??? |
chazbone (OP) User ID: 20451469 United States 09/18/2013 07:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Already debunked. Incorrect dates on a website & google are not good evidence with a few exceptions. Quoting: Dr. Manhattan The exception being if you see a memorial facebook page for a victim created the day before they died. Where was it debunked? That's a very logical assumption about the cache thing. Do we have any proof from mundane regular articles that this happens often or other times? Only reason why I ask is because I only see this happens during these tragedies...then again could be because that's the only time we look? Aww the web of deceit :) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 40669272 Ireland 09/18/2013 07:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Nam Marine User ID: 46851364 United States 09/18/2013 07:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24724364 United States 09/18/2013 07:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Already debunked. Incorrect dates on a website & google are not good evidence with a few exceptions. Quoting: Dr. Manhattan The exception being if you see a memorial facebook page for a victim created the day before they died. that exception is incorrect...if you have a FB page with under 100 likes you can change the name on the account...or who it is or what it is dedicated too. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 47080615 United States 09/18/2013 07:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 815535 United States 09/18/2013 07:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's the time stamp: Quoting: chazbone Monday, 16 September 2013 23:31 Eric Tucker And Brett Zongker, The Associated Press Print PDF so if I'm reading this correctly which I do not know if I am, this was released at 11 pm the night before correct? Thanks! Sorry if I'm missing something obvious - need help! I thought I heard about it on Monday too. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 815535 United States 09/18/2013 07:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Already debunked. Incorrect dates on a website & google are not good evidence with a few exceptions. Quoting: Dr. Manhattan The exception being if you see a memorial facebook page for a victim created the day before they died. that exception is incorrect...if you have a FB page with under 100 likes you can change the name on the account...or who it is or what it is dedicated too. Wow. You really beleive that? You must be a shill. |
chazbone (OP) User ID: 41359475 United States 09/18/2013 08:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 37686313 United States 09/18/2013 08:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If it took place a 8:20 am, that would be 0820. If this was in the same timezone then the timestamp of the article would be 15 or so hours after the event. Not a problem. If that 2331 was intended to be Z or GMT then that was just a little les than an hour before the event. Typically, people don't timestamp articles in GMT unless it indicates GMT like: 23:31 GMT Most often, though, the timestamp will indicate the timezone, like: 23:31 Eastern or 23:31 EDT or 23:31 CST Don't know for sure but I'm not suspicious. What I am thankful for is the watchful eye of your friend who pointed this out. Good call in noticing this! ...just happens not to matter THIS TIME. Keep a sharp eye out. One person above asked, "Why would they expose themselves?" I'll tell you why: They are desperate and incompetent and they think we are all stupid so it won't matter. ...and since we believe lie after lie after lie after lie, maybe they are correct. |
natasha77 User ID: 35682194 United States 09/18/2013 08:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
chazbone (OP) User ID: 41359475 United States 09/18/2013 08:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It look to me like the 2331 is the local time in 24hr time. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 37686313 If it took place a 8:20 am, that would be 0820. If this was in the same timezone then the timestamp of the article would be 15 or so hours after the event. Not a problem. If that 2331 was intended to be Z or GMT then that was just a little les than an hour before the event. Typically, people don't timestamp articles in GMT unless it indicates GMT like: 23:31 GMT Most often, though, the timestamp will indicate the timezone, like: 23:31 Eastern or 23:31 EDT or 23:31 CST Don't know for sure but I'm not suspicious. What I am thankful for is the watchful eye of your friend who pointed this out. Good call in noticing this! ...just happens not to matter THIS TIME. Keep a sharp eye out. One person above asked, "Why would they expose themselves?" I'll tell you why: They are desperate and incompetent and they think we are all stupid so it won't matter. ...and since we believe lie after lie after lie after lie, maybe they are correct. Yeah but the video I posted shows that orignialy the date it was released was Sunday and now it's been changed to Monday which would hint that the news was released before the actual shooting. |
chazbone (OP) User ID: 41359475 United States 09/18/2013 08:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21201441 United States 09/18/2013 08:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45679142 Germany 09/18/2013 08:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |