| Users Online Now: 1,337 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 292,695 | |
| Pageviews Today: 389,410 | Threads Today: 119 | Posts Today: 1,748 |
| 03:20 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,337 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 292,695 | |
| Pageviews Today: 389,410 | Threads Today: 119 | Posts Today: 1,748 |
| 03:20 AM | ||
ufos shooting stars meteors over stirling city | |
| Brian User ID: 47244726  United Kingdom09/23/2013 08:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Last night between 915pm 11pm I watched and filmed at least 20 moving objects fly over Stirling raploch. Now i have looked at the space station it was not over stirling at that time, I have also looked at iridium flares all links on video page nothing at that time. Need a bit of detective help here I filmed 2 of the objects That basically look like bright white balls of light some as bright as the moon I'm stumped what do you make of the pictures some feed back maybe I'm looking in the wrong place. Ps it was amazing to see so many big bright lights in the sky over a couple of hours. heres the video. [youtube] [link to www.youtube.com]    |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 47244726 United Kingdom09/23/2013 08:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Last night between 915pm 11pm I watched and filmed at least 20 moving objects fly over Stirling raploch. Now i have looked at the space station it was not over stirling at that time, I have also looked at iridium flares all links on video page nothing at that time. Need a bit of detective help here I filmed 2 of the objects That basically look like bright white balls of light some as bright as the moon I'm stumped what do you make of the pictures some feed back maybe I'm looking in the wrong place. Quoting: Brian 47244726 Ps it was amazing to see so many big bright lights in the sky over a couple of hours. heres the video. [youtube] [link to www.youtube.com] can someone upload the video cheers. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 47244726 United Kingdom09/23/2013 09:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 46942377 United Kingdom09/23/2013 09:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 47244726 United Kingdom09/23/2013 12:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 46956304  Australia09/23/2013 01:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What shutter speed? The reason I ask is because you can clearly see the passage of the stars in the background. My guess is the shutter was open just long enough to capture the passage of an aeroplane but short enough to not leave long trails behind the stars which would have easily given you away as a fraud. Am I getting close mate? When real photos or video do surface they will be disregarded as fakes because of you and people like you. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 47244726 United Kingdom09/23/2013 02:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What shutter speed? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 46956304 The reason I ask is because you can clearly see the passage of the stars in the background. My guess is the shutter was open just long enough to capture the passage of an aeroplane but short enough to not leave long trails behind the stars which would have easily given you away as a fraud. Am I getting close mate? When real photos or video do surface they will be disregarded as fakes because of you and people like you. There you go Idiot. I take your not a clue about astrophotography Its 6 sec long exposure on f22 fully open to take in all light. here's the stats. Location Add a location Date taken 9/22/13, 9:01 PM Dimensions 800 x 561 File name IMG_7779 modified.jpg File size 81.81K Camera Canon EOS 550D Focal Length 108mm Exposure 6s F Number f/22 ISO 6400 Camera make Canon Flash Not used Exposure Bias - If you actually look at the photos you would have no douts Thanks Idiot.  |
| Bri (OP) User ID: 47244726 United Kingdom09/23/2013 02:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It says modified Because I zoomed in on the object All photo details Are next to the photos. Location Add a location Date taken 9/22/13, 9:01 PM Dimensions 5184 x 3456 File name IMG_7779.JPG File size 6M Camera Canon EOS 550D Focal Length 108mm Exposure 6s F Number f/22 ISO 6400 Camera make Canon Flash Not used Exposure Bias - Views 2 Link to original Photos. [youtube] [link to plus.google.com (secure)] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 13389831  United States09/23/2013 03:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 47244726 United Kingdom09/23/2013 03:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 47244726 United Kingdom09/23/2013 03:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What shutter speed? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 46956304 The reason I ask is because you can clearly see the passage of the stars in the background. My guess is the shutter was open just long enough to capture the passage of an aeroplane but short enough to not leave long trails behind the stars which would have easily given you away as a fraud. Am I getting close mate? When real photos or video do surface they will be disregarded as fakes because of you and people like you. Whats wrong mate nothing to say now ha what a joke.  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 47239449 United Kingdom09/23/2013 03:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 47244726 United Kingdom09/23/2013 04:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 47350022 United Kingdom09/24/2013 11:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 47350022 United Kingdom09/24/2013 11:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator  User ID: 1637802 United States09/24/2013 02:29 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thank you. First one: [link to nova.astrometry.net] Appears to be Intercosmos 22: [link to heavens-above.com] The second one appears to be of the same, same time and sky location: [link to nova.astrometry.net] The next two appear to be grouped exposures with each other of one satellite, so here again is the astrometrically solved version: [link to nova.astrometry.net] Passing through Auriga at about 9:30. Orbcomm G1 [link to heavens-above.com]  |
