Why is there little interest in Carl munck,s work?

If a politician picked it up, he or she wouldn't get re-elected.

If a journalist picked it up, he or she would likely be working for either a conspiracy publication (low visibility) or be a young inexperienced journalist writing for a sensational and therefore low-research-intensive publication (low visibility).

If a Phd-type showed interest in it, he or she would be making an argument against the entire collective knowledge of academia in fields such as archeology, history, and sociology. Only a crazy or borderline discredited Phd-type would take that risk, and it wouldn't pass the scrutiny of any major peer-review journal.

Quite a good system we have set up for maintaining the status-quo, is it not :) It's practically self-censoring.

Great reasons. THIS IS THE smoking gun, lying on the floor while no one will acknowledge it because they're all in on the murder. They stab it with their steely knives but they just can't kill the beast. This is the passage back to the place they were before, but they had made a pact with that ol' status quo, and the nightman told them that their chance had expired. Conduit closing. See you all later when you have ears to hear.

Excellent synopsis here that can be applied a number of topics that are "not freely up for discussion" even here.

A real clue is the sudden disappearance of threads.

because math

They're not ready

I looked at some of his claims and found the alignments were actually quite a way off, although I only used google earth rather than OS maps, and there may be errors.
Still, some were close enough to be interesting in their own right.
I reckon though that you could do similar mathematical jiggery-pokery with any landmarks, even random stuff like landfill sites and public telephone boxes, and come up with similar results. I might try that one day...

He needs to release a video with good production values presented by a pretty woman.But seriously Muncks work should have changed the history books by now.

Maybe because it's pseudo-scientific bullshit?

I think it's solid math. Try debunking it and come back.