Big earthquake on October 17th? This asteroid has a history

The date October 18th always sticks in my mind.

Raymond Fault...

Raymond fault... [link to en.wikipedia.org]

Thanks AKO

Truthworker, I see a lot of claims from you that asteroids cause quakes, but if your theory is to be taken seriously (and i dont mean by those on this thread who believe in everything posted on glp) then you need to show a connection or lack of connection with other quakes of similar size around the world.
There are loads of quakes that have happened with no neo's so what is your explanation for those quakes? also why do your neo's only ever produce 6-7 magnitude quakes?

OMG...you're right.
FOr fear of showing my age...I do remember.
My Sunday School teacher's daughter was killed on that bridge...we're all actually from Long Island...she went to cali for the baseball game...it was sooooooo sad.

Thanks for bringing that up...
:sniffle:

But...it would seem that there is a definite positive correlation according to the info I've seen so far in this thread.
I'm sure OP has checked and re-checked his facts...right???

BTW...anyone else having electrical issues the last few days??? Static too??

op has never shown anything other than a chart that could confuse einstein, seeing the so called facts laid out would help.
op also stated the quake was to be a big one, while a 6 pointer is not small it is also not big enough to say "wow, you really called that one", you see 6 pointers are not as rare as one thinks. so i woulod like to know why, the neo's do not cause large earthquakes all the time when more neo's are found all the time.

Interesting.

We have been shaking a bit the past week as well.

I look for patterns and then forecast the pattern to continue. I do not know exactly the cause. My assumption for a cause is "electric universe" theories where an interaction between asteroid, earth and sun... perhaps like a capacitor discharge.

Quakes can be triggered by several factors. If some are triggered by an NEO close approach that does not mean all quakes are triggered that way. I track:

1) Days with high number of NEOs making close approaches, well above normal.

2) Asteroids with a consistent recent history of sizable quakes on previous approach dates

3) Days where with very close NEOs

NEOs might trigger quakes less than 6-7 magnitude but those events happen daily (insignificant) so why try an make a correlation? I'd say to get a "hit" the quake needs to be significant enough to get it's own GLP pinned thread.

The electric universe theory, ok. So you say, neo's that are sometimes millions of miles from earth can create an earthquake, those earthquakes that you like to predict seem to be usually 6.3 and under, if that is the case why doesn't the moon create large quakes on a daily basis being closer than some of your neo's? why didnt the near miss - 11.3k km from earth on september 27 cause a large quake with it being closer than all the neo's you call?
A pinned thread does not give it credibility, you have caught the attention of a mod, no more no less.

I do not not predict quakes 6.3 and under as odds become a coin flip. I look for a "significant" quake during my watch windows... a target day plus or minus one day.

Distance I use of the close approach is .00 to .50 AU per NASA definition (and close approach tables) of an NEO. Space is a vacuum and I have not seen a lot of correlation between distance and % chance of a quake event, whether at .01 AU or .40 AU.

The September 30th asteroid was 15-meters in diameter:
--------------
TORONTO – Russian scientists have reported that an asteroid narrowly avoided a collision with Earth on Sept. 30... a network of telescopes recorded the asteroid as it approached Earth... The 15-metre rock was detected hours before it flew only 11,300 km from Earth. It was closer to us than geostationary satellites.
[link to globalnews.ca]
--------------
BTW... A 6.5 earthquake struck the Kermadec Islands, on September 30

Who says the Moon does not cause quakes every day? My thought is that a space rock might need to build up a charge to discharge, travelling through space, then produces a seen or unseen "zap" when close enough. The moon if doing anything similar may not build up a large un-triggered "zap", discharging on a regular basis. Who knows? I just track patterns.

The asteroid as I already stated passed just hours after it was discovered on the 27th september, not the 30th which was when most news agencies reported it so that quake is irrelevant.
If you are so sure that the theory hold some credibility then why do you come here of all places to try and prove yourself? it is because there is always that part of the lunatic fringe that will believe you. Have you tried to get your theory published or at least looked at by a geologist?

I just did a bit of research after typing that and came across a very telling article written by a geologist who states that anyone with this theory is nothing more than a fraud and lo and behold YOU were quoted in that article.
[link to www.wired.com]

Would you like to lay on the table your calculations and findings of ALL quakes you think are caused by fly bys and why quakes that were not caused by fly bys happened?

7.2 Earthquake Strikes Solomon Islands & Close Approach of Asteroid 2010 HR80

This guy says he noticed the pattern and other patterns in the past...

[link to www.youtube.com]

I have nothing to prove. I try to stick to the facts, see where the chips fall, hit or miss.

You can research my past GLP posts and predictions, with full details and results of each. I think I have the best record on GLP.

Happy to get press in Wired :) Of course I have never solicited or accepted donations.

I looked again and see that the flyby was indeed September 27th at 22:50 UT

[link to www.astronomerstelegram.org]

BTW... A magnitude 6.8 earthquake struck Pakistan, on September 28

Last Edited by TheTruthWorker on 10/16/2013 06:30 PM

Now you are making no sense at all. You state that you believe asteroids cause quakes because of the electric universe, a charge between earth, the sun and the asteroid. Electricity travels at 300.000 kms, so why would it take 9 hours for the asteroid to cause a quake in pakistan?
Facts? i see none, I think Erik Klemetti was spot on with that article.
You bring the theory to the table and say you have nothing to prove? oh but you do, the onus is on you to provide proof to your outrageous claims. I am not looking through the mountain of threads to find your work, you should have it at hand all calculated out ready to back up your claims.
Lucky guess on the date, I bet you have had windows before now.

This is getting old. I have made no claims. I answered questions folks ask with my opinions and impressions and state as so.

I can't answer questions about "cause" because I can only guess. Facts I focus on are referenced to data and reports from NASA, JPL, USGS, etc.

If that data is enough for me to announce a quake watch window I do. During this window I expect to see an event, not that the event will definitely occur. For most it is fun to watch. For others they look to debunk and argue. There is nothing to debunk.

I am not here to prove a theory, just demonstrate it in action, live, in real time, for anyone to see.

I am happy to answer questions for anyone really looking for an answer.

This has been my first post and prediction in about 6 months when I let my GLP subscription lapse.

For your benefit I researched the last "scoreboard" I could find. From here you can research the related threads:

I will not post my stuff unsolicited on your threads. OK?

Most of those you call hits are dates after the date you predicted, if it down to electric as you say then there is no way that will happen, electricity travels too fast for a window (which i guessed right that you used windows before). You also failed to mention the misses in this thread including 8 neo's that produced nothing



That shows your theory is nothing more than a stab in the dark, 8 neo's would have produced at least one large quake considering you got ""hits"" on less neo's.
I also had a quick look and noticed that when you tried to predict quakes in a 24 hour window |EVERYONE failed.
This is nonesense.

it won't be mother natuan altogether different form of incoming Destruction will arrive on the heels of the physical melee shortly to ensue

that being the antichrist, lord and prince of this starry dominion herebelow upon the earth

which has rooted itself into the very ground of Nature hereupon

that sovereign ground which was an altogether pure ground prior to the fall

before the rebellion in the former Age was effected ever so neatly

you who took part in same, be warned

the deceiver is coming back around to see whom he can devour once again, like unto that prowling lion/beast that he is and in truth be

the serpent being the author of lies and confusion

King of Babylon himself

the quintessential opposition of Truth and Light

as it's written he shall once again deceive the masses, much as he did in the former Age, before the sons of God fell from their original high and free born estate of Grace hereupon

landing thereafter in an altogether new Age to then follow upon the earth

this time having been made meet to suffer flesh and temporality in consequence thereunto

the fallen and now infected earth, infested with both locusts and TARES

the foxes in the hen house seek your destruction...

will you therefore thusly align yourselves once again with such?

remains to be seen I suppose

yet will there be 137,000 pulled from the fire prior to the end of this Age

a goodly number, all things considered...

the 7000 which make up the difference to the total of 144,000 are those of Gods Election, that being they who stood against you in that former Age and time, when you turned to bite the hand that fed you after having brought you forth into an altogether immaculate eternal freeborn life...

sigh

this simply will not do, I do hope we're clear...

won't be mother nature

an altogether different form of destruction

damn fingers

That was the most recent scoreboard I could find. I have more hits and misses before and after that timeline.

You do not seem to understand how asteroids would cause earthquakes any more than I do. And you certainly do not understand the different criteria I use to target dates.

As for as timing between the NEOs closest approach and exact time of a quake... it is not a IMPACT that happens at same time. Evidence points to asteroids INFLUENCING quakes.

Analogy: Take a house of cards. Blow on it. It may not fall but may become unstable. Then someone bumps the table and if falls. It might not of fallen if it was not weakened first. What caused it to fall? Who knows.

OP, please keep updating. There are many interested in what you are posting. Weed out the others ; )

EXCUSE ME MATE?

Thread: 188 CYCLE SOLAR ERUPTION CONNECTED TO MAJOR 6.7 to 7.5 QUAKE IN RUSSIA that hits ON 188 LEY LINE (Page 6)

wait a second...

Uhhhhm, you just REQUESTED MY CLARIFICATION! LOL

But then, you've posted to my threads before many times.

So it's okay for you to do it, but not for me?



a bit hypocritical don't you think?

Last Edited by MatrixLNIN11 on 10/17/2013 05:27 AM

Battle of the prophets!

That would SEEM to be beyond mere statistical anomoly...

You know that a large Oarfish washed up in CA several days ago, right?

Another sigificant EQ predictor, if legend can be trusted.

Nothing will happen. Boring shit.

to watch

Oh, look, THE 188 FAiLER MAN. xDDD ahahaha.