Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,501 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,197,965
Pageviews Today: 2,309,620Threads Today: 1,077Posts Today: 20,199
11:48 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Act one action Obama versus Congress

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 47772746
United States
10/11/2013 07:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Act one action Obama versus Congress
Alright Pres. Obama and you're supposed to act like your real tough

Your first line is I am not going to negotiate unless I have a clean bill

Okay Mr. Speaker of the house your first line is we are not playing a game with the president this time

Okay Sen. Reid your first line is the Republicans don't know what they want

Okay Mr. Pres. no you Mr. director when is it that I get to say we're going to have to invoke martial law
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 47772746
United States
10/11/2013 08:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Act one action Obama versus Congress
I really don't want this to sound funny because I have a very bad feeling that that might be were all of this is headed martial law across the United States of America and we no longer have a president but we have a dictator
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 48202464
United States
10/11/2013 08:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Act one action Obama versus Congress
Where you been?

The deal is about ObamaCare; the supremes got it right on how to dissolve it, by saying that it is a tax, which has to originate in the house not Senate. Therefore, the whole mess is unconstitutional.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 47772746
United States
10/11/2013 08:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Act one action Obama versus Congress
Martial law is the imposition of military rule by military authorities over designated ... Fundamentally it is a requirement put on civilian government when they fail to function correctly.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 47772746
United States
10/11/2013 08:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Act one action Obama versus Congress
[link to www.usconstitution.net]

In strict dictionary terms, martial law is the suspension of civil authority and the imposition of military authority. When we say a region or country is "under martial law," we mean to say that the military is in control of the area, that it acts as the police, as the courts, as the legislature. The degree of control might vary - a nation may have a civilian legislature but have the courts administered by the military. Or the legislature and courts may operate under civilian control with a military ruler. In each case, martial law is in effect, even if it is not called "martial law."
Martial law should not be confused with military justice. In the United States, for example, each branch of the military has its own judicial structures in place. Members of the service are under the control of military law, and in some cases civilians working for or with the military may be subject to military law. But this is the normal course of business in the military. Martial law is the exception to the rule. In the United States, the military courts were created by the Congress, and cases can be appealed out of the military system to the Supreme Court in many cases. In addition, a civilian court can petition the military for habeas corpus.
Article 1, Section 9 states, "The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it." Habeas corpus is a concept of law, in which a person may not be held by the government without a valid reason for being held. A writ of habeas corpus can be issued by a court upon a government agency (such as a police force or the military). Such a writ compels the agency to produce the individual to the court, and to convince the court that the person is being reasonably held. The suspension of habeas corpus allows an agency to hold a person without a charge. Suspension of habeas corpus is often equated with martial law.
Because of this connection of the two concepts, it is often argued that only Congress can declare martial law, because Congress alone is granted the power to suspend the writ. The President, however, is commander-in-chief of the military, and it has been argued that the President can take it upon himself to declare martial law. In these times, Congress may decide not to act, effectively accepting martial law by failing to stop it; Congress may agree to the declaration, putting the official stamp of approval on the declaration; or it can reject the President's imposition of martial law, which could set up a power struggle between the Congress and the Executive that only the Judiciary would be able to resolve.
In the United States, there is precedent for martial law. Several times in the course of our history, martial law of varying degrees has been declared. The most obvious and often-cited example was when President Lincoln declared martial law during the Civil War. This instance provides us with most of the rules for martial law that we would use today, should the need arise.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 47772746
United States
10/11/2013 08:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Act one action Obama versus Congress
The President, however, is commander-in-chief of the military, and it has been argued that the President can take it upon himself to declare martial law. In these times, Congress may decide not to act, effectively accepting martial law by failing to stop it; Congress may agree to the declaration, putting the official stamp of approval on the declaration; or it can reject the President's imposition of martial law, which could set up a power struggle between the Congress and the Executive that only the Judi




Man

Could be shaping up
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34944393
United States
10/12/2013 06:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Act one action Obama versus Congress
It's getting closer





GLP