The Impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama w/ Anton Chaitkin

Stupid. How can you impeach someone if they hold no office?
Obama never has been and never will be the President.

The word "impeach" is a misnomer here as it presumes that the action of impeaching is in fact a done deal impeachment, which it isn't and which it will not be.

wot?

Obama: Ineligible due to Natural Born Citizen Requirement
McCain: Ineligible due to Natural Born Citizen Requirement
Romney: Ineligible due to Natural Born Citizen Requirement
Rubio: Ineligible due to Natural Born Citizen Requirement
Cruz: Ineligible due to Natural Born Citizen Requirement
Jindall: Ineligible due to Natural Born Citizen Requirement

....

Ahem....it will just piss him off more and he will detain all with martial law..

what planet are you living on?

you would have to enjoy sniffing your own farts to listen to all that rambling. i imagine you would also have to have your legs crossed and you would have to be wearing some type of professor hipster jacket.

Correct!

None of them have both parents (or were themselves) born in America so they can not be "natural born" citizens which in the Constitution is a separate and higher citizenship standard for the President.

Obama (father from Kenya)
McCain (himself born in Panama Canal Zone)
Romney (father born Mexico)
Rubio (both parents born Cuba)
Cruz (himself born in Canada)
Jindal (parents born India)

From [link to www.art2superpac.com]

Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of U.S. Constitution as adopted 17 September 1787:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

John Bingham, aka “father of the 14th Amendment”, was an abolitionist congressman from Ohio who prosecuted Lincoln’s assassins. Ten years earlier, he stated on the House floor:

All from other lands, who by the terms of [congressional] laws and a compliance with their provisions become naturalized, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens. Gentleman can find no exception to this statement touching natural-born citizens except what is said in the Constitution relating to Indians. - (Cong. Globe, 37th, 2nd Sess., 1639 (1862))

Then in 1866, Bingham also stated on the House floor:

Every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.... - (Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866))

Last Edited by TexasPaleo on 10/25/2013 09:16 PM

At least 2 of those were born abroad to an American citizen mother which makes the child a citizen and neither had to go through naturalization.

Hell. Clinton was impeached and it did nothing to stop him from finishing his term and agenda

Nobody who has posted a comment has a brain.

Sorry, OP.

I have had personal contact with Anton Chaitkin, and he is brilliant.

He was one of the first to attack Obamacare, by the way.

John Bingham, aka “father of the 14th Amendment”, was an abolitionist congressman from Ohio who prosecuted Lincoln’s assassins. Ten years earlier, he stated on the House floor:

All from other lands, who by the terms of [congressional] laws and a compliance with their provisions become naturalized, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens. Gentleman can find no exception to this statement touching natural-born citizens except what is said in the Constitution relating to Indians. - (Cong. Globe, 37th, 2nd Sess., 1639 (1862))

Then in 1866, Bingham also stated on the House floor:

Every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.... - (Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866))


THHHHAAAAANK YOOOOUUUUUU

Oh man...it's tough finding other people that are even willing to look at the issue. But look at you. You're already on the same page. It is so rare to find someone else that sees it.

Nice to meet you.

Just an edit to your post: I think the best argument against Mitt was that his father was a Mexican citizen at the time of Mitt's birth. So, non-nbc

Nice post, O.P.

That definition is null and void, as it was a simple dictate by a Judge or President or CNN Host. The definition exists and the Constitution is the only place natural born citizenship is required in a law, which gives it twice the resistance to being unilaterally changed by someone. A change to the Constitution like that would absolutely require a new Amendment, which has never happened. So...no. None of those candidates are eligible to be President.

The planet on which the label "Natural Born Citizen" is defined as having both parents born in the United States of America.

Which Obama didn't have. Which makes him Constitutionally ineligible to be President of the United States of America.

Capiche?

bump

bump

Impeachment would be a badge of honor to this tool....

In light of all that has unfolded since Obama has "taken" office..

I just don't see that happening. ..or it is at least as possible he becomes a regional dictator of the NWO.

Can we simply agree on the fact that Barack Hussein Obama has reserved the right to kill or secretly incarcerate ANY human being on the planet earth because of any reason he may or may not disclose.

And certainly, he need not disclose any or all persons he kills, killed or will kill. Nor need he disclose whether or not he has decided to, attempted to or actually killed... Nor for any reason he so chose does Mr. Obama have to reveal any information whatsoever in regard to anyone he chose to have killed or "disappeared" at any time or for any reason.


So for those who have difficulty reading legalese, what the above really says is...

Obama can kill or secretly incarcerate anyone he wants to and for anyone he wants and for any fucking reason he wants and the details for any or all of these "missions" is basically NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS!

(However, I do concede that Obama may require the consent of his wife for any or all of the above murders and/or incarcerations. Nonetheless, I cannot confirm that this statement is true, but I admit it seems to be that way ;)

Impeach for this traitor is a kind word. There will be others.

Great interview, learned a lot and I enjoyed the interview quite a bit.

Thanks. :)