Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,691 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 775,491
Pageviews Today: 999,699Threads Today: 196Posts Today: 3,761
10:01 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Triangle UFO over Amsterdam 10/28/2013

 
kalashnikov
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 1387669
United States
11/01/2013 08:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Triangle UFO over Amsterdam 10/28/2013
Not sure what to think about this one. What say you? Real or CGI? I saw an actual triangle at close range in 2008. Flew right past my wife and I at treetop level. It looked to be an isosceles triangle though, while the one on the vid is equilateral.


Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1278422
Netherlands
11/01/2013 09:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Triangle UFO over Amsterdam 10/28/2013
Real.
Quad-or hexacopter.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 40444776
Ireland
11/01/2013 04:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Triangle UFO over Amsterdam 10/28/2013
Not sure what to think about this one. What say you? Real or CGI? I saw an actual triangle at close range in 2008. Flew right past my wife and I at treetop level. It looked to be an isosceles triangle though, while the one on the vid is equilateral.



 Quoting: kalashnikov


Looks pretty good to me,and the guy sounded pretty supprised when it shot off?
kalashnikov (OP)

User ID: 31627706
United States
11/01/2013 07:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Triangle UFO over Amsterdam 10/28/2013
Not sure what to think about this one. What say you? Real or CGI? I saw an actual triangle at close range in 2008. Flew right past my wife and I at treetop level. It looked to be an isosceles triangle though, while the one on the vid is equilateral.



 Quoting: kalashnikov


Looks pretty good to me,and the guy sounded pretty supprised when it shot off?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 40444776


I thought so too. I've seen the bright flash on nocturnal lights, though I've negver seen one shoot off like that. I've always suspected the lights were some related to their propulsion system. The triangle I saw had an extremely bright light on the trailing edge. It either didn't care about being seen, or the light had an essential function beyond illumination.
Ger_reG

User ID: 49267553
Germany
11/01/2013 07:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Triangle UFO over Amsterdam 10/28/2013
Real.
Quad-or hexacopter.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1278422


You just proved you didn't watch it till the end
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 45581443
United States
11/01/2013 07:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Triangle UFO over Amsterdam 10/28/2013
You mention CGI, so let me give you a good rule of thumb to work off of.

If a shot involves a computer-generated element that must be added to real footage, and the camera is moving, that footage has to be motion tracked. This means using a program to place tracker "dots" on features of the scene that are solid and unmoving to approximate the camera motion and recreate it on the computer.

For this reason, if all you can see is sky/clouds or water (elements that are constantly moving) in a shot, it is damn near impossible to motion track it, making CGI unlikely.

Now, it could be 100% CGI, but recreating hand-held camera motion like that is not a simple task, nor something for beginners or basic hoaxers.

So whatever it is, it's probably legitimate footage.
kalashnikov (OP)

User ID: 31627706
United States
11/01/2013 07:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Triangle UFO over Amsterdam 10/28/2013
You mention CGI, so let me give you a good rule of thumb to work off of.

If a shot involves a computer-generated element that must be added to real footage, and the camera is moving, that footage has to be motion tracked. This means using a program to place tracker "dots" on features of the scene that are solid and unmoving to approximate the camera motion and recreate it on the computer.

For this reason, if all you can see is sky/clouds or water (elements that are constantly moving) in a shot, it is damn near impossible to motion track it, making CGI unlikely.

Now, it could be 100% CGI, but recreating hand-held camera motion like that is not a simple task, nor something for beginners or basic hoaxers.

So whatever it is, it's probably legitimate footage.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 45581443


Very interesting! Thanks AC!
okdk
User ID: 40166867
United Kingdom
11/01/2013 07:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Triangle UFO over Amsterdam 10/28/2013
comes in a black model also
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 39011376
Netherlands
11/01/2013 08:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Triangle UFO over Amsterdam 10/28/2013
fake. I don't need to be convinced of the TR3B, i've seen one up close, but this video looks and seems fake.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6706547
United States
11/01/2013 08:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Triangle UFO over Amsterdam 10/28/2013
You mention CGI, so let me give you a good rule of thumb to work off of.

If a shot involves a computer-generated element that must be added to real footage, and the camera is moving, that footage has to be motion tracked. This means using a program to place tracker "dots" on features of the scene that are solid and unmoving to approximate the camera motion and recreate it on the computer.

For this reason, if all you can see is sky/clouds or water (elements that are constantly moving) in a shot, it is damn near impossible to motion track it, making CGI unlikely.

Now, it could be 100% CGI, but recreating hand-held camera motion like that is not a simple task, nor something for beginners or basic hoaxers.

So whatever it is, it's probably legitimate footage.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 45581443


Your logic is sound, and you obviously know your cgi. My question to you is if it were 100% cgi, and considering the clarity isn't the greatest, could they be filming a good hd monitor at the right fps with a handheald camera?

spock
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 12762865
Australia
11/01/2013 08:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Triangle UFO over Amsterdam 10/28/2013
Not sure what to think about this one. What say you? Real or CGI? I saw an actual triangle at close range in 2008. Flew right past my wife and I at treetop level. It looked to be an isosceles triangle though, while the one on the vid is equilateral.



 Quoting: kalashnikov


Looks pretty good to me,and the guy sounded pretty supprised when it shot off?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 40444776


I thought so too. I've seen the bright flash on nocturnal lights, though I've negver seen one shoot off like that. I've always suspected the lights were some related to their propulsion system. The triangle I saw had an extremely bright light on the trailing edge. It either didn't care about being seen, or the light had an essential function beyond illumination.
 Quoting: kalashnikov


i think those bright flashes are reflections of the sun though..

cool vid!
The Zissou

User ID: 40693021
United States
11/02/2013 12:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Triangle UFO over Amsterdam 10/28/2013
You mention CGI, so let me give you a good rule of thumb to work off of.

If a shot involves a computer-generated element that must be added to real footage, and the camera is moving, that footage has to be motion tracked. This means using a program to place tracker "dots" on features of the scene that are solid and unmoving to approximate the camera motion and recreate it on the computer.

For this reason, if all you can see is sky/clouds or water (elements that are constantly moving) in a shot, it is damn near impossible to motion track it, making CGI unlikely.

Now, it could be 100% CGI, but recreating hand-held camera motion like that is not a simple task, nor something for beginners or basic hoaxers.

So whatever it is, it's probably legitimate footage.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 45581443


Just so you know, this is fake. By "fake" I mean not a UFO. By "not a UFO" I mean CGI.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 39554676
Netherlands
11/10/2013 03:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Triangle UFO over Amsterdam 10/28/2013
EMA is today in Amsterdam it is live now maybe some satanic connections.

News