Science Proves That Evolution is a LIE

And the trees!

Political Science proves that De- Evolution is the TRUTH!

Was this REALLY your best effort? I sure hope that you can conjure up some more powerful voodoo from your bag of magick tricks. Perhaps you can summon Merlin in some seance and he will cast a spell that will make you appear to be knowing and wise.

Nah...... who am I trying to kid?
That WAS your best effort.
.

Yes! I failed creationism 101. My mom would be so proud!

If you ONLY failed Creationism.....
perhaps your mom was amazed.
.

I'll keep waiting for your rebuke on the beetle, tree, and woodpecker. Please take your time.

What part of QUOTES from the videos with TIME MARKS is confusing you? Piles of verbage that don't address the videos, are just piles.

Just curious, but why do you keep posting a picture of "Jesus" with long hair? Did Jesus have long hair?

1 Corinthians 11:14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?

Satan has fooled you yet again. Should we take a vote to see how many readers are surprised by that?
.

Piles of knowledge. Don't be scared.

If only you had some knowledge that you could show us by using those videos. Alas....... NO.

What you assume to be "Piles of knowledge", other people would shout out a warning of "Hey....look out that you don't step in that pile". Perhaps for you, they are the same thing.

OP, this post is fucking retarded. Not only is evolution already fucking proven, we've witnessed it in our lifetimes. Look at insects resistance to GMO. That alone proves evolution. Evolution also doesn't defy God. Get the fuck real.

I forgive your ignorance. Have a nice day.

Look at the damn beetle post. It thrashes your video. You fucking retard.

Despite your gracious suggestion, I have no need to follow your yellow brick road of deceptions and dead-ends.

I posted the truth in the very beginning with those MANY videos of scientists proving that evolution is a LIE. You have failed to prove any of those videos to be inaccurate. If you could prove it, you would have shown us the errors in the videos with the QUOTES and the TIME MARKS of those errors.

Thanks anyway.
.

Nothing is wrong with the video. It is the complete truth.

Now please answer the question.

Why do you worship a child murderer?

I guess a blind horse ("Christian") can't be led to water. You ask for the proof I give it to you. Congrats! You are officially the dumbest person I've ever debated. Good riddance Christ-Troll.

Do you mean the very children that He, Himself created?

While it's true that you never shared a single piece of meaningful information about all of those Creation videos, at least you know that you are leaving with the knowledge that you never let your emotions get the better of you.
.

Yep, and I still don't know anything about the tree.

So, I read the following from a creationist website. Finally regarding my trees.

Another assumption skeptics make is that the species we have today are the same as at the time of the Flood. Though some species were probably around then, like the Wollemi Pine, it is safe to assume that most species around today are not exactly the same as what was around before the Flood 4,400 years ago. Why is this significant? One big reason is that plants today have undergone 4,400 years of speciation, mutations, and genetic deterioration. This must mean some of the genetic information has been lost. Although many would consider species today to be as delicate as species 4,400 years ago, the fact is that those same species could have been more genetically and physically robust, and thus better able to withstand extreme conditions than modern plants, including up to nine months immersed in or floating on open floodwaters!

Skeptics have a tendency to ignore the fact there are tree and plant species that actually thrive in flood-like conditions or even saltwater. For example, mangroves live primarily along tropical coastlines. Not to mention the flowering plants and trees that flourish in swamplands. Some trees that live in swamplands include (but are not limited to) the white cedar, eastern hemlock, loblolly pine, black spruce, red maple, elm, pin oak, and birch. Knowing that some trees withstand saturating water conditions makes it difficult to say “plants could not have survived the Flood” because those trees are literally thriving in such conditions. Of course, the real issue behind this question is a matter of authority—God’s perfect Word or man’s fallible ideas.

Interesting. Speciation, sounds an awful lot like evolution. And it's coming from you side. How do you refute this?

You proved that you really don't know much about anything, but that's OK. The readers who have watched the videos that I posted on the 1st page know plenty of things, and that's good.
.

Read the prior post.

The group of Atheist/Evolutionists that are hanging out on this thread certainly have no interest in research, growth or learning.

They are very dogmatic in their thinking and seem more interested in arguing as opposed to presenting information and/or facts to validate their hypothesis and lies.

Satan is like that ... always dancing around and skirting the issues, creating diversion and distractions.

Expending energy on nebulous concepts rather than accepting Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour, spending time in the Word of God, growing, learning, praying, in fellowship, and sharpening as they grow in Love, Grace and Wisdom.

If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him. James 1:5

For the Lord giveth wisdom: out of his mouth cometh knowledge and understanding. Proverbs 2:6

.

As I said in other posts, Creationists need to take up the hobby of fossil hunting for themselves in the field with the help of a geologic map and they'll discover the fossils they find perfectly fit and prove the geologic column they so hate and purposely reject.

Only one side lacks research, they are easy to spot as they use stupid bible quotes. Feel free to move a mountain on to the White House lawn though.

Last Edited by SheldonReturns on 11/14/2013 05:51 PM

Evolution and geology doesn't refute God, it's refutes Fundementalist Creationism.

God didn't write the Old Testament, MEN did.

Last Edited by TexasPaleo on 11/14/2013 05:54 PM

It appears that some people would benefit from watching Kent Hovind's Creation series that is found here [link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Here is one of those videos.

The Dangers of Evolution - Dr. Kent Hovind

He has a fake Phd and does not understand basic science, not to mention that he is currently in jail. His main arguments can now be found on creationist websites labelled 'argements creationists should not use'

Actually I've watched quite a lot of Hovind's stuff and was amazed at the lies, distortions, illogic, and willful deception that man spews. I felt sorry for his audience in the way they were being lied to and misled.

Last Edited by TexasPaleo on 11/14/2013 05:59 PM

.

Last Edited by TexasPaleo on 11/14/2013 05:58 PM