ZetaTalk Accuracy, Proof Just Keeps Coming : Blog Radio May 31

"I know, I know. Planet X moves like a snail in this solar system, but at the same time the shift is right around the corner. It is a very anxious time for both the bunkers who see, and the debunkers who also see but are bent on world domination. For the debunkers who debunk out of fear and comfort, then it really doesn't matter how soon or slow it is."



EXACTLY!

"It is a very anxious time for both the bunkers who see, and the debunkers who also see but are bent on world domination."

What an idiot. From www.dictionary.resource.com:

Bunk - Empty talk; nonsense

Debunk - To expose or ridicule the falseness, sham, or exaggerated claims of.

What about this don't you understand? What is it that the bunkers "see"? All I see from them is claims that never come true and constant evasion of answering questions. The debunkers constantly make predictions from everyday science that always come true to thenth degree and are testable by anyone.

An easy to test Zeta claim:

See Capricorn in the morning before dawn? Then Nancy is wrong.

Easy way to test debunker accuracy:

Mercury will transit the Sun November 8th, 2006, at 21:41 UTC. When it does, it proves Nancy wrong about Earth halting.

Let's see a similar prediction by the Zetas that contradicts traditional science and see who comes out correct.

Sure are right about that proof coming in. It's rising earlier and earlier every night. And proving Zeta more and more inaacurate every night that it does.

Got Capricorn?

elle!! Ike-Ike don,don
Go Ahead ,Go Ahead !!
WE assist YOU & NANCY
They are Good working Now!!

"Soon..."



We've been hearing this for over 3 years now (since well before Nancy's May 2003 disaster) and it's always "soon" the debunkers will be proven wrong, "soon" they'll be exposed as government agents etc. etc. ad nauseam.

It seems to be the same "soon" as in "weeks not months" to the pole shift, and "weeks not months" before the ISS is evacuated.

And still there's not a shred of real evidence of Px. And neither is there a shred of evidence that any debunker is a government agent.

In fact, looking at it logically, there's a lot more evidence that the bunkers like 78/68 are the agents, sent here to try to distract people from ideas about human effects on climate change. We've all seen how the current US administration has tried to silence people working on climate and global warming, so it makes a lot of sense that they'd be sending disinformation agents like 78/68 out to sow seeds of doubt in the face of mounting evidence about man's influence on the climate.

Yes, I think that's much more likely than that he actually believes any of Nancy's nonsense...

Go here and explain this.
There are 3 parts to this article.
This is the first one.
What is it?
[link to www.tmgnow.com]

simple physics:

The earth is hold in orbit by the atraccion of the Sun, and it doesn`t fall into the sun because of the centrifugal excerted on it by It`s movement.

So If the earth would be halted in it`s orbit, The centrifugal force would be gone and we would fall towards the sun and be burn like toast...In hours.

This is High School physics.

"Go here and explain this."



Explain what?

It's a bunch of woo-woos who don't understand what they're looking at, don't understand the technology, its limitations and its behaviour, and who can't accept that a satellite that's well past its sell-by date can have problems and need regular housekeeping and maintenance.

I challenge any of the bunkers to explain how it is that independent amateur observers all over the world can observe and time to a fraction of a second the asteroid occultations listed at [link to www.lunar-occultations.com] for the 2nd and 3rd quarter of 2006 if the earth was the least bit (and I mean literally feet...not miles) out of place? These occultation paths of visibility are in many cases only a few hundred yards wide with observers in many cases traveling hundreds of miles to set up their telescopes at exact locations in the paths...a few feet one way or the other in some cases means missing the occultation entirely. Yet the bunkers claim that things are out of place. If so, I challenge them to explain how that could be yet occutation observations continue perfectly in every part of the world all the time.

By the way, there is a live chat room link on that web site. I also challenge any of the bunkers to join in and try to explain their claims that the earth and other astronomical objects are out of place. That would be a neat show to watch!

You did't read the whole thing.
These pics are not new.
Did they put up new since that time?

"You did't read the whole thing."

I looked through the whole page, and there's nothing real there. It is, as I said, people who don't understand the images or instrument readings they're seeing, and who obviously haven't a clue about the problems of keeping a satellite like that running years after it was supposed to be dead.


"These pics are not new.
Did they put up new since that time?"

Why are you asking me? I don't know when or how often they update the page, but most of it seems well out of date, and it says at the top - "updated 26 December, 1998".

If this "orca" really exists, why have they no more recent observations, or any data from alternative sources?

Ok Nancy, I believe you.
But just tell us in 20 words or less What,Where and When,dont worry about who.
Thanks a lot

repulsion force as well as others we are

still (re?)discovering influence all


here is an article about last weeks

gunfight in dc that was a jackhammer-not!


[link to www.tomflocco.com]

Isn't it a little early for you to be plastered Nancy/elle?? And don't tell me you do not drink, please. Nobody that's sober writes that unintelligible.

How do you like me now??









":I see you're playing stupid again, looks like you're winning":

.

Kook Accent

any reason for digging up this corpse ?

Well..with all the doom going on in the world..we need a good laugh.