OH SHIT! Report: Mossad working with Saudis on contingency plans for potential attack on Iran! IT'S ON!

Thread: Saudi Arabia And France Hold Joint Military Drills

This is bad. Like actual doom this time.

Last Edited by Canuck_Hillbilly on 11/16/2013 09:51 PM

Just posted the same thing, it is on!

It would seem so.

A poll by Yisrael HaYom this week reveals that most Israelis think that the IDF is strong enough to begin a military strike against a nuclear Iran - without US support.

Over 2/3 of respondents (65%) believe that Israel should oppose a deal - which would reduce Iran's economic sanctions in exchange for a reduction in its nuclear capabilities - between Iran and the P5+1. Only 16.1% support the move. Talks for a possible deal are set to resume on November 20.

[link to www.israelnationalnews.com]

"You break it you own it", for once we won't own a fucked up Middle East fiasco. Saudi Arabia and Israel have plenty of money, they want to play games let them deal with the resulting mess.

What I'm curious about is how this would affect the relationship between the US and Israel. Israel and the Saudis are capable of attacking Iran without us, but they still need our support and this would create a lot of turmoil.

I WAS LISTENING TO A interview today of jim sinclair on usa watchdog

and sinclair said actions display power, threats display weakness, and that interview was from 3 weeks ago and at that time Netanahue gave IRAN 30 days to give up its nuke program,

shit is going down soon



YEAR OF THE SNAKE IQ PREDICTION
BEFORE JANUARY 30TH
WE WILL HAVE WW3 IN PLAY
IMMIGRATION REFORM PASSED
AND A MAJOR ECONOMIC CRISIS

Thread: THE YEAR Of THE SNAKE ...ends on january 30.....if its history holds true THEIR WILL BE WORLD WAR BEFORE ITS END

their plan is to get the US to pay for in billions of dollars and tens of thousands of US troops lives, in a decade long invasion of iran while they watch, flinging the odd bomb and assassinating the odd scientist or state official.

wouldn't that be your plan if you were them?

I doubt it would be an invasion, there would be no reason to invade. It would just be bombs and bombs and bombs.

HAPPENING UNTIL THE 18TH
Thread: Japan readies huge military exercise amid territorial tensions with China

Thread: US aircraft carrier arrives in Philippines: ....Now The U.S is stationed in the South China Sea...China must love that

As of now, Saudi Arabia is totally being flooded....yup. I'm sure they have other things to deal with at least the next few days


[link to rt.com]

Yup! ^^^ Maybe not an invasion, per se, but it'll be one Hell of a fireworks show. This shit is going to start WW3. We've been waiting for it... Well, here it is.

floods in the desert???
WHAT THE FUCK ARE THE CHANCES????

"number of times Israhell has threatened (fill in the blank)"

Nevermind, nobody can't count that high.

They'll just buy new shit. They've got the money.

Did you look at the pictures? Riyadh is totally flooded, cars floating, no schools - last pic on the article shows lighting hitting a tall building, pretty crazy.

I meant no school tomorrow will be open

‘Sucker’s deal” is how French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius referred to the agreement that began to materialize in negotiations between Iran and the P5+1 a week ago.

Thanks to the French, the Islamic Republic will not, for the time being, get relief from the sanctions regime as it marches – nearly unhindered – toward nuclear capability. A historic security blunder was avoided.
The French are in. Until they surrender.


The French are to be praised for demonstrating leadership. Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s harsh criticism of the purported deal turned out not to be a lone voice. A warmer-than-usual welcome awaits France’s President Francois Hollande when he arrives this week accompanied by Fabius.

Fabius’s decision to break with the consensus, break the P5+1’s informal rules and go public with his reservations regarding the interim deal, is a sign of the times. Not too many years ago – particularly under the administration of president George W. Bush – it was a decidedly hawkish and interventionist US that led international coalitions in Iraq and Afghanistan. However, US President Barack Obama, in part out of deference to a war-weary America, has scaled back his country’s dominant role in the region.

The US refrained from taking the leading role in the military intervention in Libya, preferring instead to build a broad coalition. Though the Syrians crossed his redline with regard to the use of chemical weapons, Obama refrained from ordering an air attack and then failed to receive congressional support to do so. And the US has cut its aid to Egypt.

America seems to be less than willing to maintain pressure on Iran. Secretary of State John Kerry has asked US lawmakers not to increase sanctions against Islamic Republic. And the US has failed to maintain a credible military threat against Iran at least since the Islamic Republic’s new president Hassan Rouhani launched his charm offensive.


[link to www.jpost.com]

its not going to end well

allow me to add this Canuck...

Israel will not fight their own war. Chickens.

They won't have to thanks to the "Unwavering support" from the US. We haven't heard that in a while, have we?

just remember...like the obamacare mess...this is all...bush's fault

About the same chances as Jews and Muslims joining forces against a common enemy.