Massive Influx of Comets indicates INCOMING STAR (SUNS BINARY PARTNER)

a) Let me star with the "Binary Research Institute".
The original name was "Sirius Research Institute" and they claimed, Sirius is our binary star (thus their claim of the precession of the equinixes). After their hypothesis was debunked, they renemed it to BRI.

Sirius is about 6 light years away and has a smaller companion.
The Alpha Centauri system is only 4 ly away and has about the same mass as the Sirius system.
Thus the gravitational influence of the Alpha Centauri system would be much greater and if our sun had a binary, it would be Alpha Centaury.
Unfortunatale the sun and Alpha Centauri move through space in a way that rules out a binary connection.

Neither IRAS nor WISE have shown an object that could be a brown dwarf star or a bigger planet in the vicinity of our solar system.

b) There is a hypothesis that some million years ago a small star, brown dwarf or a free floating planet passed our solar system and disturbed the Ooort's Cloud, sending objects on a million years long journey to the inner solar system.

Also our neighbouring stars, especially the Alpha Centauri system disturbe the Ooort's Cloud. These perturbations will increase since in the next 25,000 years Alpha and Proxima Centauri will approach to the sun up to 3 ly (the comets will be here in some 100,000 to million years:))

Last but not least the objects on the Oort's Cloud disturbe themself, collide and send other objects in the direction of our sun.

Thus no binary star is necessary for comets from the Oort's Cloud - btw. no astronomer rules out that there might be another planet some hundred or thousand AU out but according to the IRAS and WISE data the chance is almost zero.

.

Ah, got the "information" from New Thor.

There are hundreds of comets with an eccentricity of >=1 (parabolic or hyperbolic orbit) discovered since the invention of the telescope in the 17th century.

Any evidence that
a) the comets are "extra-solar (besides NT claim)?
b) 14 comets with an eccentricity of >=1 in a year are somthing special (besides NT claim)?

How about not relying on GLP "information" but do your own research by avoiding lessons from the University of YouTube and woo-woo websites?

You do realize that by telling me not to rely on GLP for information, you are telling me not to listen to you as well, seeing as you are giving me information via GLP.
And last I checked, Binary Research Institute is not GLP.

I really must note that the most direct opposition to the theory expressed in this thread seems to be coming out of Germany. Most notably Hydra, but there have been a couple ACs as well.

I wonder why that is?

I include me too - If you would do a proper research you wouldn't need GLP.

And BRI is just another woo-woo site - pseudoscience. If you would do the math you would recognice this.

.

May be the European education system is better and we can do the math.
(Not meant as an insult.)

.

No, no, I think there is another reason.

Hydra, may I ask, what are your thoughts on the theory? Do you think it is possible that a) we are in a binary system and b) that close proximity of the twin star is causing solar system weirdness?

EVIDENCE

Binary Star Prevalence

"There are many common misconceptions about binary star systems, one of the most common myths is that binary star systems are the cosmic oddity and that single star systems are the most prevalent, when, in fact, the opposite is true. 50 years ago binary stars were considered a rarity. Now, most of the stars in our galaxy are known to be paired with a companion or multiple partners....."

[link to www.binaryresearchinstitute.org]

.

I did read the article link for this thread.I didn't understand it all,but I do believe in the theory.THanks for the info. I do have one question concerning the binary system. THe article stated that both "stars" orbit around a central object,but I don't recall seeing what this central object is theorized to be in our system. Any idea what it may be? ALso, I apologize if this has already been answered, just point me to the page. Just wanted an answer b4 the thread "died".

It is called a barycenter. It is a common center of the combined mass of two or more orbiting objects. It is not an object itself, it is just a relative point in space. The barycenter is always closer to the most massive object.

Imagine a balance, with a light weight on one side, and a heavier weight on the other. In order to achieve balance, the fulcrum must be closer to the heavier object, to provide more leverage to the lighter object. A barycenter is where the fulcrum would have to be in order to achieve balance.

Actually a binary star system is the norm in the universe, isn´t it?
We would be an exception.

Just jumped in? How about reading the thread?

Again: Only 1/3 of the known stars are in a binary or multiple star system (with 1/2 of brown dwarf stars having a companion).
Only a minority of sunlike stars have companions.

.

a) Let me star with the "Binary Research Institute".
The original name was "Sirius Research Institute" and they claimed, Sirius is our binary star (thus their claim of the precession of the equinixes). After their hypothesis was debunked, they renemed it to BRI.

Sirius is about 6 light years away and has a smaller companion.
The Alpha Centauri system is only 4 ly away and has about the same mass as the Sirius system.
Thus the gravitational influence of the Alpha Centauri system would be much greater and if our sun had a binary, it would be Alpha Centaury.
Unfortunatale the sun and Alpha Centauri move through space in a way that rules out a binary connection.

Neither IRAS nor WISE have shown an object that could be a brown dwarf star or a bigger planet in the vicinity of our solar system.

b) There is a hypothesis that some million years ago a small star, brown dwarf or a free floating planet passed our solar system and disturbed the Ooort's Cloud, sending objects on a million years long journey to the inner solar system.

Also our neighbouring stars, especially the Alpha Centauri system disturbe the Ooort's Cloud. These perturbations will increase since in the next 25,000 years Alpha and Proxima Centauri will approach to the sun up to 3 ly (the comets will be here in some 100,000 to million years:))

Last but not least the objects on the Oort's Cloud disturbe themself, collide and send other objects in the direction of our sun.

Thus no binary star is necessary for comets from the Oort's Cloud - btw. no astronomer rules out that there might be another planet some hundred or thousand AU out but according to the IRAS and WISE data the chance is almost zero.

.

So, if there is a binary partner to our sun, why would they want to keep it a secret? What would be the big deal?

Well?

Cyclical catastrophism and how the elites always prep and with each time their likes are even more advanced, compared to the few survivors who did not preps and have no survival/living of nature knowledge.

Something like that.