Really, what does a debunker say to this?
Quoting: Bluepill Exactly.. I would venture to say that the only possible way is to say that these artifacts may be hoaxed or manipulated. However, Nassim Harramein is a reputable witness in this story.. and it does seem rather well put together..
As well as genuine looking imho.
Not one hundred years ago...ascended masters.
Not two hundred years ago some saw fairies.
Not thhree hundred years ago...leprechauns.
Before that...sprites and woodland creatures.
Before that incubus and succubus...
Need I continue?
Yes, perhaps I should. Angels, humans from the future or past, etc.
What does this tell the world? That the 'form' takes on the appearance of what is in the conciousness. The 'form' never identified itself as extraterrestrials before the advent of science fiction. In which case, the 'form' is tied directly to storytelling of the time in which it appears. It comes as angels when angelogy occupies the mind, it comes as incubus and succubus when angels and demons occupy the mind, it comes as ascended masters when false 'spirituality' occupies the mind and in the exact same manner it takes on the appearance of extraterrestrials as science fiction came into the world.
In all written accounts of these forms, we find 'missing time', abductions, baby snatching, sex etc. Just as we do today.
The counter argument used against this evidence? "the people of ages past just weren't 'ready' to hear about extraterrestrials". And if you believe THAT, well then, I have a bridge to sell you - in the desert.
