ISON - behind the glare AWESOME!!!!

light is light

you get the same data as the experts get when you analyse a photo in photoshop, or whatever program you use

yes, they have better toys than you, but you can see a hell of a lot in the photos you get

Deb, you're trying a bit TOO hard now. you're on a loser.

Yeah, nothing to worry about tho 'apparently'!

Well if Ison is that large would it not be classified as a planet? And since it grew wings, would not that make it a "winged planet"

When it comes to planets size does matter.

Defintion of a planet is below:

[link to www2.ess.ucla.edu]

No, because we're talking about the coma not the actual nucleus.

I have asked out of curiousity a few times amd still no one has told me who deb is/was, lol.

Anyway, light is light? I make a living on photoshop. All you can do with a screenshot or jpeg like that is play with pixels, not really light. The majority of the coma of ison is white in that pic. All photoshop can do is treat the mass of white as though it were one object. That is perhaps simplifying it a bit, but in essence that is what it is doing. Basically all you are seeing is most of the coma where it is dense enough to show up as white or almost white. the fuzzy, almost see through blueish bits get dropped, but all the rest stays as if it were one object. You are not seeing the nucleus.
Now if the image is not a jpeg, i am interested in looking at it further, but i dont know the source of the image used here.

That solid interior is only 3km across?

BULLSHIT

It isn't a comet, it is an artificially created body inhabited with billions of highly advanced extraterrestrial beings of who created us...They are our Gods and they are coming back again...

You will see the errors in that thinking soon enough...

Well then they're REALLY late pickin me up!!!

Here we go again. One accuser says shill and the other defend his/her innocence....result: thread killed

Sorry, i miss-read your post. I thought you were agreeing with the 3km across statement.

I'm pretty certain that the glare the op is talking about is the coma and the thing that is behind it is the nucleus. If so, it us easily large enough to be classified as a planet.

i used the following software on the pic of Comet ISON Taken by Fritz Helmut Hemmerich on November 22, 2013 ;

irfanview
picasa
photoscape
meesoft image analyzer
gimp
image J

it is what it is. maybe all those filters created what was never there in the first place. or maybe they didn't. maybe they revealed details hidden by the glare. you decide.

We need Astro with his 80mm to verify this!!!!!!!!!

what just huh? what?

I'm beginning to wonder about the sanity of people on this forum.

what file type was the image?

Why does every thread about ISON some AC wants Astro's thoughts on it? Let the OP alone.

It's path will soon take an unexpected and un-explainable change...

That music means doom! its gonna hit aint it??? huh huh ????

i used this image green girl

[link to i1208.photobucket.com]

it's JPEG and unlikely to be the original format.

It is fully disclosed in the website banner......
Lunatic Fringe.

his 8cm what?

I agree. Astro is the perfect person to look at this! I dont take photography through a telescope, so i cant help with verifying the purity of the picture like he can. But what my gut tells me is that we are not looking at an unedited pic to begin with. I am pretty sure before the photographer submitted the pic he had already altered it to get that pretty black background and colour. So without knowing how he might have altered the image, we can hardly look at a photoshop job someone else did to it and say it must be true.

YUP YUP YUP YUP

Green Snot go away

NO SHIT MAN!