The elites need to cull half the population so there are more jobs for people

Guidestones-tard

Ponzi schemes always collapse, never sustainable. TPTB are criminal.

By cull you mean murder.
In which case, for a job, you will willingly murder people.
This insane conclusion derives from your programming.
"Your job is your living"

See what they did to you? By implanting that belief, you will do just as Satan said "A man will give all that he has to save his own life". You will give all that you have - your dignity, your innate knowledge that to kill another human is wrong....- you'll toss it all aside to save your own life. That sir tells you whom you obey.

If you disagree that's ok. They'll just find someone that wants to kill and make it legal for them to do so. Like a soldier and have them kill all dissenters.

They will just set up another world war to remove us useless eaters, the trick will be doing it without nuking everything.

The was an interesting documentary called the Spirit of 45 which revolved around Britain post WW2, and how the population did not want to return to the same poverty they returned to after WW1, thus the Beverage(spelling?) Report identified a number of areas that where of concern to the people, employment, health, housing, transport etc..

The culls of WW1 and WW2 actually provided the people with the notion that as a collective if they could banish the evil of fascism they could banish the other evils plaguing their lives too.. and for the most part they did..

It took until the 1980s to see most of that undone, granted it was undone by those in power on both sides, but it still took 30 years to try and turn back that clock..

Another such cull will have similar effects, once you give people the notion that they can work together to stand up to an evil, any evil, you also give them the tools to stand up for themselves..

Sadly we now find ourselves in a similar position to the pre-war era thought of greed and selfishness.. it is to our own detriment, and the elite need us en-masse they needs more of us so we fight amongst ourselves for scraps, and to survive, the less of us, well that will always be a detriment to them.

History evidences that fact... the plague itself re-wrote the way society was ran and again for a short while the common man and woman was freer and had power... that power and freedom dissipated once the population grew...

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Only the strong will survive what is coming. Old, sick and crippled folks will have much shortened lives. Hate to say it but that's whats in the cards.

What they DO need to do, is start mandating poof of your ability to support offspring, BEFORE being allowed to crank out redundant little clones.

The very people who should NOT be having kids, due to their inability to SUPPORT them, are the very ones cranking out the most future democrats.

It should be ILLEGAL for you to FORCE other people (taxpayers) to finance your spawn. It is immoral and it is DESTROYING the country, and the planet.

Survive your own mortality, silly.

It doesn't have anything to do with jobs. Too many people means they can't control the minds of the majority. It's simple math.

Hey Nip... Are you REALLY that ignorant?

Seriously?

Do you have ANY idea just how many documents, publications, and other various references, have been printed over the last hundred years, all spelling out the need for DRASTIC depopulation? On the order of 90%.

The Georgia Guidestones are merely an example etched in stone. There's PLENTY of examples on paper, and quotes from all the various proponents over the years. Thus the use of hundreds of various slow (soft) kill methods, to help keep disease and mortality high, and population growth slowed.

Maybe you've gotten a little too much radiation over there, for your brain to function properly.

Yep. There definitely needs to be some sort of regulation over the population growth. I'd advocate a softer, long-term approach instad of rapid depopulation: one kid's ok if your family is financially and socially stable, but any additional kids will cost you more and more in taxes.

Your soldiers would kill your citizens, and you would let that happen?

Someone playing God?

From a historical stand point the times of depopulation actually handed more power and freedom to the masses than at times of overpopulation.

The notion of overpopulation really revolves around those who control the flow of resources, and while they control the flow they can control the effects, which is to keep us perpetually in a state of overpopulation while we fight amongst ourselves for the scraps.

A depopulated state normally comes after an event (war/plague etc) that forces the masses to band together, and once they survive that then their self interest is forced onto a higher level.

After the plague that meant pitting the elite against each other to pay better wages and after WW2 taking monopolies away from the elite..

My opinion is that they will keep us in our present state as it benefits them far more than some depopulation event.

Hey Nip... Are you REALLY that ignorant?

Wait for your sorry ass' own financial event.

Culling the population will be difficult. Without a war then you have to prove someone is the enemy. Without a clear enemy such as in warfare then you have to ensure chaos does not develop.

If you introduce a virus you likely may have unexpected, perhaps disastrous results.

China had to relax the one child policy because the population is aging and there is a gap in the job market. Also there is a disparity between number of females to males which means you have to allow and cultivate social change.

Everywhere there has been a population decline there are immigrant problems or questions about how to handle "guest workers".

Everywhere there are great wage disparities there is a problem with immigration.

To forcible cull the population there would need to be a great propaganda campaign to implement it (similar to what the Nazis did). This would seem unlikely with world trade and the problems associated with a country being cut off from trading. Easy communications is the enemy of propaganda.

The greatest danger of people in power is how they would substantiate the criteria for culling. Who is the target?

To just allow starvation to occur will likely cause a revolution. This is what happened in France. This kind of revolution generates a period of chaos.

Remember 311

That's old-paradigm thinking. You don't have to slave away your whole life just to be able to pay for roof over your head and food.
We need to get self-reliant and self-sufficient, starting with food self-sufficiency (aquaponics seems to be a good solution).

LOL! No you got it all backwards. They want the dumb clones, the don't want the old smart ones.

Hey, I just met you,
And this is crazy,
But here's my number,

Cull Me Maybe

The question I have is where is the advantage in the cull? the way it works currently the greater the population the greater the power those at the top have over resources and with that ever greater the power they can continue to impose more rules on our everyday lives as we, the masses strive to fight one another for what are mere scraps.

I can not help but feel that situation suits them more than a cull since it drives down wages, quality of life and costs for them while increasing their profits exponentially, and the disparity between the haves and have nots grows daily is I feel a testament to the approach they are using.

it will happen automatically in next 40 yrs due to many reasons:
environmental degradation is the worst enemy of mankind..very few urban people know this but loss of forests,water bodies and natural habitats will destroy humanity faster than any program by elites

antibiotics will stop working in next few decades and dirty living will kill almost 40% population

polluted environments will kill the rest

in a way you are correct but elites now don't want too many proles competing for resources which they need
if pop.is just 10 million,elites clans can have very good life for another 5000 yrs

Good idea. They can start with you.

I admit that it is always a possibility, and at some point that idea will be seen in a favourable light.. I expect to some right now those views are held in a favourable light.

However I don't know if we are quite there yet.. still a number of variables.. do they want to be stuck on this planet? or seek some where else to expand to..

I tend to lean more towards the notion that they are, on the whole far more expansionist in nature, seeking ever greater wealth to be constrained by this planet.

I have the feeling that in some heads being Emperor of the Universe will have a distinct appeal and for that they'll need as many ants (which I what I feel they see us as) to make it possible..

I am not discounting the other probabilities.. but looking at the way things are today, this feeling of being kept in perpetual fear/trapped the way serfs where, that the last thing they want is a cull given how well things are working right now.

However I do admit that I could be reading this all wrong..

If there is a cull of the herd take me out too cuz I'm not staying on this planet containing mostly elite pieces of shit. Unless they take me into their flock, then I'll stay.

kind of planning elites engage is not understood by average citizens..they have tremendous media power,legislation,cops,judges,ammunition...
why do you think they are promoting feminism and LGBT rights with a viciousness which will make nazis ashamed of their own propaganda techniques..
why do they want eugenics for masses?