Comet ISON Doom

I gave you and astro a bunch of evidence to the contrary, but you guys ignored me or pushed me aside because my explanation from a physics standpoint went over your head.


Ison was obviously intact when it went around the sun, and it continued out-gassing as far as we could track it on lasco C3.

Bruce Gary even posted on his website that Ison could have a trajectory change when going around the sun, but you ignored my explanation of that from a physics standpoint.

Bruce Gary claims Ison is dead because it has a low visible magnitude, which means almost nothing from an astrological standpoint. Without infrared, x-ray, or stereo measurements on top of visible data, you aren't getting the full picture and making claims off of almost nothing.

I can go on if you wish. It's pretty simple physics to understand that a body in space can have trajectory changes from an enormous amount of factors, and also if Ison fragmented, it would lose visible magnitude, but it wouldn't lose potency to cause destruction on a planet if only one size-able fragment hit us. Remember, a 30m wide object destroys cities, a 150m wide object destroys parts of continents, and anything larger is, well fuck, lets party.



And just to clarify, I'm not saying anything is headed our way, I am merely pointing out that it is a possibility from a physics standpoint.



Peace, Love, and Harmony
Cody

your evidence was pretty much debunked as it was presented. I know you disagree, and that is fine for you.
Yes, things explode and it can alter trajectory just not going hundreds of thousands of miles around a sun. any changes that it could make in trajectory would only become apparent in subsequent orbits, and as ison is never coming back it is a moot point.

I gave you and astro a bunch of evidence to the contrary, but you guys ignored me or pushed me aside because my explanation from a physics standpoint went over your head.

Ison was obviously intact when it went around the sun, and it continued out-gassing as far as we could track it on lasco C3.

Bruce Gary even posted on his website that Ison could have a trajectory change when going around the sun, but you ignored my explanation of that from a physics standpoint.

Bruce Gary claims Ison is dead because it has a low visible magnitude, which means almost nothing from an astrological standpoint. Without infrared, x-ray, or stereo measurements on top of visible data, you aren't getting the full picture and making claims off of almost nothing.

I can go on if you wish. It's pretty simple physics to understand that a body in space can have trajectory changes from an enormous amount of factors, and also if Ison fragmented, it would lose visible magnitude, but it wouldn't lose potency to cause destruction on a planet if only one size-able fragment hit us. Remember, a 30m wide object destroys cities, a 150m wide object destroys parts of continents, and anything larger is, well fuck, lets party.



And just to clarify, I'm not saying anything is headed our way, I am merely pointing out that it is a possibility from a physics standpoint.



Peace, Love, and Harmony
Cody

"Could have" and "if ison fragmented" is speculative language, not math.

So you're merely pointing out that it is a possibility, right? In other word, you don't exactly know shit, right? If you want to infuse scientific credibility to your speculation, why don't you make a calculation to confidently state how much percentage that possibility is instead of speculating with ambiguous multi-interpretation word which isn't scientific at all? If you use ambiguous word like possibility, anything is possible, even ison ended up in yo ass is possible, why not? the important question is the mathematical percentage of the probability. So you could calculate that number?

Prove me wrong, that you ain't retard. What's hubs? Who's that imbecile signing his post with "ison lives"? You get 10 IQ points for each right answer.

So I'm retarded because I don't know shit about space? I'm a finance major in college, why the fuck would I need to know what 'hubs' is? Lol

He was using theories based on planet orbits from the early 1600's to argue a comet going perihelion, which is idiotic to say the least.

Well it is a 100% guarantee that fragments from Ison will hit Earth.

[link to img35.imageshack.us]

No proof of this either. It's actually more disturbing to see them take such a whimsical perspective in light of the fact that there is no evidence other than to support a cover up of information.

Hubs is the name of the guy that found Asteroid ISON right?

You're such a fucking troll.

Nasa already said we get hit from both sides by fragments from Ison...

"In my experience, this kind of double whammy is unprecedented," says Wiegert.


[link to science.nasa.gov]


Go back to your cave you wretched beast.


Oh wait, this is your cave, I forgot.

It works, to say the least.
Thread: Comet ISON's debris is following the original orbit of the comet.
:headshot:

Well it is a 100% guarantee that fragments from Ison will hit Earth. The size of the fragments is the issue at hand.

And not everything is possible according to modern physics, so save your insults for someone else.

For me to track a fragment specifically would require a lot of equipment on my part, which I don't own. So unless you want to buy me at least $50,000 in scientific equipment, I can't give you exact numbers. That is why observatories were made, and supercomputers are used.

Except its original orbit intersect with earth's... Doom is never off until end of Jan then?

I wonder how many different angles They have of this footage & which one They showed us.

Yup NASA certainly did say this.

"...some of that dust might end up on Earth."

"...his findings suggest that an unusual meteor shower could be in the offing."

"Don’t expect to notice. The invisible rain of comet dust, if it occurs, would be very slow."

they have multiple angles, and all of them are readily available for you to watch if you bothered to take the time to find them

do you consider it an intersection when there is an overpass with one highway going underneath the other highway?

Yup NASA certainly did say this.

on the contrary there is much evidence to support what i just said. we know ison is small, we have measured it. we know ison will travel on its projected path because every comet we have ever seen does. We know that ison broke up before perihelion because it stopped producing new gas. We know ison is not a comet anymore because it is producing no new dust or outgassing events.
there is a lot of evidence for my side of the debate. Any for the opposition?

Nasa told you it was destroyed by the sun,thats does not make it a FACT


if nasa missed that meteor over Russia a while back it means they are not worth listening to...as for the Chelyabinsk meteor...its a sign of the POWER of what can happen....

Or, mayhaps, I won't bother asking legitimate questions & just TROLL around, being an asshole, to random posters. Is that fun? Doesn't really sound like fun. Nah, I'll just keep asking relevant questions & trying to figure out what's going on with Comet ISON. You TROLLS, resident ex-spurts & status quo shills are hammering the crap out of this topic & it makes my curious mind wonder why that is.

Wow the science channel documentary about Ison I watched contradicted a lot of this statement. Perhaps you guys should all get the story straight. They even showed footage of how it even brightened again after dimming just after perihelion, when it started out gassing again.

Go to [link to www.solarsystemscope.com]
Slide the time to Nov 1st, and tell me whether it's overpass or underneath, or its debris has a fat chance of hitting us...

Wow the science channel documentary about Ison I watched contradicted a lot of this statement. Perhaps you guys should all get the story straight. They even showed footage of how it even brightened again after dimming just after perihelion, when it started out gassing again.

Neither one of you understand what they said. They're talking about dust emitted by the comet prior to perihelion, that we might encounter when we cross the point of closest intersection between our orbit and ISON's orbit. Again, that point corresponds to where ISON had been at the start of November, not after perihelion.