WATCH carefully ... WATCH VERY CAREFULLY

Here is what I think they really did.

They exploded a white phosphorous or magnesium bomb high above the main explosion for a dramatic crowd pleasing effect. I mean WOW it looks spectacular, but while everyone is turning away and worried about going blind, they miss how this effect is created.


All blasts work in certain ways, for example a bomb explodes outwards at first which causes a vacuum to be created. Then the air, dust and rubble etc is sucked back into this vacuum.

Thunder and lightning works the same way.

Thunder is caused by lightning, which is essentially a stream of electrons flowing between or within clouds, or between a cloud and the ground. The air surrounding the electron stream is heated to as hot as 50,000 degrees Fahrenheit, which is three times hotter than the surface of the sun. As the superheated air cools it produces a resonating tube of partial vacuum surrounding the lightning's path. The nearby air rapidly expands and contracts. This causes the column to vibrate like a tubular drum head and produces a tremendous crack. As the vibrations gradually die out, the sound echoes and reverberates, generating the rumbling we call thunder. [link to www.scientificamerican.com]

A similar thing happens during an explosion, shown here …


.

I think the science of this, goes something like this …

A bomb with a huge heavy base is dropped from a height and hits the ground. When it hits the ground it fires off an explosive charge high above itself, much like firing off a huge firework high into the air. Then the main blast goes off some seconds later on the ground, just when the initial explosion above is beginning to suck air back into its vacuum. The bomb below explodes outwards and upwards. Some of its energy is drawn up the sucking funnel created from firing off the explosion below, which would be much like a tube created by lightning. After the initial outward force from the below explosion, the dust and air rushes back to the point of explosion and on up the vacuum tube leading up to the initial blast location above. This is why you see this strange phenomenon of the dust getting sucked up what looks like a tube and billowing over as it reaches the top.

It's awesome really, a real crowd pleaser and scary.
.

They have two bombs in one because the u-235 has to detonate first to begin the chain reaction then explosion of the plutonium.....

Is the science for a chain reaction nuclear bomb correct?

Here is (supposedly) why a nuclear bomb as in a nuclear CHAIN reaction doesn't work and never will in a bomb.

However it does work in a peaceful reactor. In a reactor you do not have to mechanically compress uranium metal rings in a tube for it to start to react. In a peaceful atomic power plant there is no mechanic compression of uranium atoms to keep the plant going which is how it is claimed a nuclear bomb works.

A nuclear fission of one atom emits about 3.5% of its energy as gamma rays, less than 2.5% of its energy as fast neutrons (total ~ 6%), and the rest as kinetic energy of fission fragments (this appears almost immediately when the fragments impact surrounding matter, e.g. water in an nuclear power station, as simple heat, where the reaction is controlled at a certain constant temperature).

Note: no matter is transformed into pure energy à la Einstein here. Only one atom is split into two other atoms - fragments - and some neutrons and gamma rays and as they are moving they represent kinetic energy.

In an atomic bomb (supposedly due to exponential chain reaction), this heat may serve to raise the temperature to 100 million K (kelvin) and cause secondary emission of soft X-rays, which convert some of this energy to ionizing radiation.

This is utter nonsense. Less temperature will simply melt the uranium uranium-235 (U-235) metal assembly that will flow or evaporate away.

However in nuclear reactors, the fission fragment kinetic energy remains as low-temperature heat, which itself causes little or no ionization.

It is the speed of the neutron, when it hits the nucleus that has a lot to do with how likely a fission is to occur. One might think, intuitively, that if the neutron is going really fast that it has a better chance of “shattering” the nucleus, but that’s NOT how it works. Actually, for the fissile nuclei such U-235 the SLOWER the neutron is going, the more probable fission is.

So slowed-down neutrons to maximize fission are an ABSOLUTE requirement. And then from fission comes more neutrons, which continue the reaction. The neutrons borne from fission are going really fast. Really, really fast and they have to slow down to have a good chance of causing fission.

That’s where the moderator comes in.

The moderator in a nuclear reactor is the material whose job it is to slow down neutrons without absorbing them. This slowing-down is done by neutrons bouncing off the nuclei of the atoms in the moderating material. For most reactors, moderation takes place in the water that also cools the reactor. For a high-temperature reactor like the liquid-fluoride reactor, graphite (carbon) is used as the moderator. This was not really known in the 1940's when the atomic bomb was said to have been invented.

Thus the moderated free neutrons that keep the fission going in a peaceful nuclear power reactor by heating the water. The 2 MeV kinetic energy of a free neurton becomes, swau 0.01 MeV kinetic energy and the rest - 1.99 MeV - heats up the water.

Only fools believe that Metal in mechanical Contact with Metal explodes and badly informed people like most politicians believe that uranium-235 metal in mechanical contact with uranium-235 metal in the shape of target rings or projectile rings ... or any metal in mechanical contact with itself - will produce ... an atomic explosion: that 4x1026 or 6x1024 metal U-235 nuclei in some uranium-235 (U-235) target rings or projectile rings fission exponentially in nanoseconds into fragments and release energy is just fantasy.

The Only Risk is Overheating and Melting of the Metal and Surroundings.

In a power plant the uranium U-235 is in the form of an oxide (a molecule) where the U-235 part may fission and produce heat under controlled forms. No critical masses! No exponential chain reactions.

It can never explode.

The only risk is overheating of the environment due to lack of cooling water Fukushima style.

Then the reactor enclosure will burst and its bottom may drop out (melt) and some radioactive elements will leak out.

Safety then is simply to ensure that cooling water is always available and that the bottoms of the reactors are STRONG … quite simple actually.

[link to heiwaco.tripod.com]
.

NUKE PROPAGANDA FOOTAGE

Now look at how some classic footage was made of the trees getting violently swept by the blast.

First off, they’re not trees at all, only plastic trees placed in big holes in the ground.

See them place the logs in the holes in the ground at (43.18)
[link to www.youtube.com]

See the trees again from (46.20 - 46.50)

According to this video at (7.55)... [link to www.youtube.com]

the forest was synthetic, so the trees were not even made of wood.

What about the bus and jeeps that are thrown about? Do they have heavy engines in them or are they just shells of vehicles? I mean it’s fabulous dramatic footage and all with the colour altered to a spooky mar orangey red and the scary music, but it's mostly propaganda.
.

Last Edited by Lamplite on 12/26/2013 02:50 PM

Almost no radioactively was left by the Tsar bomb the largest supposed nuke in the world and the same was found to be the case at Hiroshima.

A Jesuits who was beyond a hill a bit further away when the blast went off was asked this question (old chip shown) "What is your opinion regarding the belief that the ruins of the city omitted deadly rays" his reply was "I think it was just a rumour as myself and others worked in the city immediately after the explosion and we suffered no ill effects what-so-ever.



American scientists sweeping Hiroshima with Geiger counters a month after the explosion to see if the area was safe for occupation troops found a devastated city but little radioactivity. Water lilies blackened by the blast had already begun to grow again, suggesting that whatever radioactivity there had been immediately following the blast had quickly dissipated."

[link to www.straightdope.com]

There was very little radioactive fallout." Even though the Earth below the blast was sheered by the intense head and bowled out.



These bombs were probably only coated with radioactive material ie they were dirty bombs.
.

Watch to this hugely disturbing video.



So which cities were fire-bombed five days after the two supposed nukes went off?

Why did the brick buildings survive the nuke blasts in Japan when all the rest of the cities which were made of wood were burnt up?
.

Rubbish!!!

God, we suck.
Why on earth create a device that has no other purpose but to destroy everything?
There is no good that will ever come from a nuclear bomb.

Well thankfully we never created them, the whole thing was a hoax.
.

Wow what an enlightened response. He posts a fact you post rubbish with no facts. Keep up with the great detective work. You should work for CNN

Pinned. We are being whipped into a panic in the US every day. Here, you've posted a GREAT example of how so much of this shit is theater. Cheers, peace, and THANKS!

Was wondering if that was your point. Interesting, great post OP, five stars.

It's not meant to cause radiation rather destruction from the blast etc.
I do not see your point...

Ever hear the term brisance Mr seconds later?

bingo

The Hiroshima bomb was uranium
The Nagasaki bomb was plutonium.

Maybe you are thinking of three in one.

there has to be the ignition blast, to cause the chain reaction.... therefore OP's supposition is invalid...

lots of folks call it extortion.


war on drugs
war on terror
global warming
nuclear war


designed to cause fear and extort $$$

Dr. Harold Jacobsen, a scientist from the Manhattan Project, told the Washington Post, "Hiroshima will be barren of life and nothing will grow for 75 years.”


Phoenix Trees in 1945 (Photo by Eric Kim)

The trees had a different idea.

Chinese Parasol trees (aka Phoenix Trees) about 1300 meters from hypocenter, had no major structures between them and the blast. They were hit hard. They lost all of their branches and their trunks were hallowed out and burned on the side facing the blast. They were assumed, and understandably so, to be dead. But the very next spring, new leaves budded.

[link to tgaw.wordpress.com]
.

A deterministic estimate of the nuclear radiation fields from the Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear weapon explosions requires the yields of these explosions. The yield of the Nagasaki explosion is rather well established by both fireball and radiochemical data from other tests as 21 kt [one kiloton equals the explosive power of 1,000 tons of TNT]. There are no equivalent data for the Hiroshima explosion. Equating thermal radiation and blast effects observed at the two cities subsequent to the explosions gives a yield of about 15 kt [at Hiroshima]. The pressure-vs-time data, obtained by dropped, parachute-retarded canisters and reevaluated using 2-D hydrodynamic calculations, give a yield between 16 and 17 kt. Scaling the gamma-ray dose data and calculations gives a yield of about 15 kt. Sulfur neutron activation data give a yield of about 15 kt. The current best estimates for the yield of these explosions are the following:
Hiroshima 15 kt

Nagasaki 21 kt

The outside limits of uncertainties in these values are believed to be 20 percent for Hiroshima and 10 percent for Nagasaki. [In other words, the Hiroshima bomb has an outside range of 12-18 KT, and the Nagasaki bomb an outside range of 18.9-23.1 KT.]

All footage was stolen after the Hiroshima blast and the US totally controlled the country to about 1952.

U.S. occupation authorities, who would run Japan for the next 61/2 years, seized the film of some 30 Japanese newsreel photographers who had arrived some days after the bombing to record the destruction.

Read more: [link to www.time.com]

The blast did not even take out the brick bank which re opened for business three days later.
.

Take a close look at these two pictures

Tokyo after being fire bombed in 1945 notice the brick building still standing.

[link to upload.wikimedia.org]

Now look at Hiroshima after apparently being nuked.

[link to inapcache.boston.com]

Did you spot any differences?

No, same, same, because both were fire bombed like Dresden.

Before World War II, Hiroshima's population had grown to 360,000, and peaked at 419,182 in 1942. Following the atomic bombing in 1945, the population dropped to 137,197. By 1955, the city's population had returned to pre-war levels. (strange don't you think considering the place was meant to be full of radiation!)

[link to en.wikipedia.org]


WHY DID 137,000 people stay on if the place was full of radiation? Why did they steal all the film footage?
.

not this fucking moron again.

Truth passes through three phases:

First it is ridiculed.

Second it is fiercely and violently opposed.

Third, it becomes self-evident.

Is it a full moon?

Yet another government shill.

So predictable ...

SHILL
.

Which is where we are now with nuclear missiles and power plants.
You, meanwhile, think it is a magnesium flash.