Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,987 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,205,267
Pageviews Today: 1,868,919Threads Today: 529Posts Today: 11,585
03:55 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States

 
TheTruthMonger
Guitard

User ID: 51941339
United States
01/01/2014 10:24 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
Pretty interesting map showing likely targets in a 2000 or 500 nuclear warhead attack scenario.

How would you fare?

[link to www.thesurvivalistblog.net]

Last Edited by TheTruthMonger on 01/01/2014 10:26 PM
"And it really didn't have to stop...it just kept on going."
TheTruthMonger (OP)
Guitard

User ID: 51941339
United States
01/01/2014 10:29 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
I dont get what could be in Montana and N Dakota that would make them so targeted? Or the cluster in colorado/nebraska/wyoming?
"And it really didn't have to stop...it just kept on going."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21223542
United States
01/01/2014 10:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
All of the silos we have thats why the attacks are clustered there
catninetails

User ID: 50486882
United States
01/01/2014 10:36 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
Please explain why the 2,000 war head is a black blotch and the 500 warhead is a purple triangle which would be a larger area. 500 is less than 2,000, inquiring mind wants to know.
wisc_natureboy

User ID: 52185502
United States
01/01/2014 10:38 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
Ground Zero in either scenario.

dance
.
-
.

We all breathe the same air.
.-.. --- ...- . / .- .-.. .-..
(love/all)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17419717
United States
01/01/2014 10:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
I have a black dot on my forehead.
hiding
brassbat

User ID: 15444309
United States
01/01/2014 10:42 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
What is the warhead yield ? Nuke 1
jjjjj
godzilla85

User ID: 49935125
United States
01/01/2014 10:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
I'm so dead in either scenario
Judethz
Israel is Eternal

User ID: 47012985
United Kingdom
01/01/2014 10:47 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
I dont get what could be in Montana and N Dakota that would make them so targeted? Or the cluster in colorado/nebraska/wyoming?
 Quoting: TheTruthMonger


[link to youtu.be]
TheTruthMonger (OP)
Guitard

User ID: 51941339
United States
01/01/2014 10:54 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
Ground Zero in either scenario.

dance
 Quoting: wisc_natureboy


Yea same here...

Id be dead in the blast
"And it really didn't have to stop...it just kept on going."
TheTruthMonger (OP)
Guitard

User ID: 51941339
United States
01/01/2014 10:55 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
All of the silos we have thats why the attacks are clustered there
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21223542


Hey thanks i didnt think of that one!
"And it really didn't have to stop...it just kept on going."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 52312151
United States
01/01/2014 10:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
Why are military targets hit in the 2000 warhead scenario but not in the 500? I think they have this 100% backwards
Kirk

User ID: 46623222
United States
01/01/2014 10:56 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
I dont get what could be in Montana and N Dakota that would make them so targeted? Or the cluster in colorado/nebraska/wyoming?
 Quoting: TheTruthMonger


ICBMs
Worry is a misuse of the imagination.
s3krtsqrl

User ID: 48327223
United States
01/01/2014 10:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
Please explain why the 2,000 war head is a black blotch and the 500 warhead is a purple triangle which would be a larger area. 500 is less than 2,000, inquiring mind wants to know.
 Quoting: catninetails


I think they're referring to the number of missiles/bombs launched, not the size of them.
O Dog of Maddness
User ID: 51098790
United States
01/01/2014 10:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
I shall take my lawn chair up on top of the trailer and fire up one last joint make a large whisky and coke and say FUCK YOU WORLD then watch the light show peace
TheTruthMonger (OP)
Guitard

User ID: 51941339
United States
01/01/2014 10:59 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
Why are military targets hit in the 2000 warhead scenario but not in the 500? I think they have this 100% backwards
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52312151


Maybe the main goal in global thermonuclear warfare is to destroy as many people / infrastructure as possible with secondary targets being military?

1dunno1

Interesting question
"And it really didn't have to stop...it just kept on going."
ClydeX

User ID: 11310285
United States
01/01/2014 11:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
I dont get what could be in Montana and N Dakota that would make them so targeted? Or the cluster in colorado/nebraska/wyoming?
 Quoting: TheTruthMonger


All of the silos we have thats why the attacks are clustered there
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21223542


Yes

Please explain why the 2,000 war head is a black blotch and the 500 warhead is a purple triangle which would be a larger area. 500 is less than 2,000, inquiring mind wants to know.
 Quoting: catninetails


What it is showing is if 500 bombs were to be used in an attack, the likely targets would be those marked by the triangles. If 2000 bombs happened to be used, those strikes are denoted by the black circles.

The projected targets in a supposed 500 bomb attack would still be targets in a 2000 bomb attack, which is why you see those particular targets with both symbols.
Job 12:7) But ask now the beasts, and they shall teach thee; and the fowls of the air, and they shall tell thee:
8) Or speak to the earth, and it shall teach thee: and the fishes of the sea shall declare unto thee.
Kirk

User ID: 46623222
United States
01/01/2014 11:02 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
Why are military targets hit in the 2000 warhead scenario but not in the 500? I think they have this 100% backwards
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52312151


Maybe the main goal in global thermonuclear warfare is to destroy as many people / infrastructure as possible with secondary targets being military?

1dunno1

Interesting question
 Quoting: TheTruthMonger


If things go properly the tubes will be empty when theirs arrive.
Worry is a misuse of the imagination.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4567599
United States
01/01/2014 11:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
I would be a crispy critter if I don't get about 50 miles east of where I'm at.
Fartster

User ID: 29674192
United States
01/01/2014 11:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
I would be dead, instantly. It would be in my backyard...literally
catninetails

User ID: 50486882
United States
01/01/2014 11:15 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
Please explain why the 2,000 war head is a black blotch and the 500 warhead is a purple triangle which would be a larger area. 500 is less than 2,000, inquiring mind wants to know.
 Quoting: catninetails


I think they're referring to the number of missiles/bombs launched, not the size of them.
 Quoting: s3krtsqrl


Okay, got it and yes I'm toast :(
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25360940
United States
01/01/2014 11:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
Why are military targets hit in the 2000 warhead scenario but not in the 500? I think they have this 100% backwards
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52312151


Maybe the main goal in global thermonuclear warfare is to destroy as many people / infrastructure as possible with secondary targets being military?

1dunno1

Interesting question
 Quoting: TheTruthMonger


My mos in the army. First targets military,industrial,then civilian.
TheTruthMonger (OP)
Guitard

User ID: 51941339
United States
01/01/2014 11:19 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
Why are military targets hit in the 2000 warhead scenario but not in the 500? I think they have this 100% backwards
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52312151


Maybe the main goal in global thermonuclear warfare is to destroy as many people / infrastructure as possible with secondary targets being military?

1dunno1

Interesting question
 Quoting: TheTruthMonger


My mos in the army. First targets military,industrial,then civilian.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25360940


Got it. I think kirk made a good point that the silos may not even be primary targets at all since they should be empty
"And it really didn't have to stop...it just kept on going."
Frayed Knot
you wish you looked this good at 50

User ID: 35406953
United States
01/01/2014 11:20 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
Please explain why the 2,000 war head is a black blotch and the 500 warhead is a purple triangle which would be a larger area. 500 is less than 2,000, inquiring mind wants to know.
 Quoting: catninetails


I think they're referring to the number of missiles/bombs launched, not the size of them.
 Quoting: s3krtsqrl


Okay, got it and yes I'm toast :(
 Quoting: catninetails


Me too. Right next to an AFB.
I have long feared that my sins would return to visit me, and the cost is more than I can bear. - The Patriot
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 52300876
United States
01/01/2014 11:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
Pretty interesting map showing likely targets in a 2000 or 500 nuclear warhead attack scenario.

How would you fare?

[link to www.thesurvivalistblog.net]
 Quoting: TheTruthMonger


The whole concept is wrong.
The Elite can't let this happen as it would hurt their chances of ruling the world.
Since most, if not all World leaders are their puppets, it has no chance of occurring. It is just used to scare you, so they can justify big military expenditures. While they and their buddies laugh all the way to the bank.
TheTruthMonger (OP)
Guitard

User ID: 51941339
United States
01/01/2014 11:26 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
Pretty interesting map showing likely targets in a 2000 or 500 nuclear warhead attack scenario.

How would you fare?

[link to www.thesurvivalistblog.net]
 Quoting: TheTruthMonger


The whole concept is wrong.
The Elite can't let this happen as it would hurt their chances of ruling the world.
Since most, if not all World leaders are their puppets, it has no chance of occurring. It is just used to scare you, so they can justify big military expenditures. While they and their buddies laugh all the way to the bank.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52300876


Maybe youre onto something there!

Control via fear
"And it really didn't have to stop...it just kept on going."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 25360940
United States
01/01/2014 11:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
Not when they fire from subs off the coast. Minutes to target.
As that is happening the big icbm's are already airborn. Less than one hour your country is toast.2/3 dead.
chuckles45

User ID: 50642100
United States
01/01/2014 11:30 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
Not in a blast area, but I'd die from the fallout.
Idealism is a wonderful thing, as long as you have someone rational to put it to good use.
s3krtsqrl

User ID: 48327223
United States
01/01/2014 11:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
Pretty interesting map showing likely targets in a 2000 or 500 nuclear warhead attack scenario.

How would you fare?

[link to www.thesurvivalistblog.net]
 Quoting: TheTruthMonger


The whole concept is wrong.
The Elite can't let this happen as it would hurt their chances of ruling the world.
Since most, if not all World leaders are their puppets, it has no chance of occurring. It is just used to scare you, so they can justify big military expenditures. While they and their buddies laugh all the way to the bank.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52300876


Maybe youre onto something there!

Control via fear
 Quoting: TheTruthMonger


Completely agree. Very unlikely scenario, but still an interesting graphic.
Simple27

User ID: 51550563
United States
01/01/2014 11:32 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
Yup, I'm dead

abomb

5 stars OP : )
Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning.

The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it.

The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits.

You have to learn the rules of the game. And then you have to play better than anyone else.
TheTruthMonger (OP)
Guitard

User ID: 51941339
United States
01/01/2014 11:45 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States
Yup, I'm dead

abomb

5 stars OP : )
 Quoting: Simple27


Thanks simple

hf
"And it really didn't have to stop...it just kept on going."

News