Nuclear Attack Target Map - United States | |
TheTruthMonger (OP) User ID: 51941339 United States 01/01/2014 10:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21223542 United States 01/01/2014 10:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50486882 United States 01/01/2014 10:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
wisc_natureboy User ID: 52185502 United States 01/01/2014 10:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17419717 United States 01/01/2014 10:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
brassbat User ID: 15444309 United States 01/01/2014 10:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
godzilla85 User ID: 49935125 United States 01/01/2014 10:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Judethz User ID: 47012985 United Kingdom 01/01/2014 10:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I dont get what could be in Montana and N Dakota that would make them so targeted? Or the cluster in colorado/nebraska/wyoming? Quoting: TheTruthMonger [link to youtu.be] |
TheTruthMonger (OP) User ID: 51941339 United States 01/01/2014 10:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TheTruthMonger (OP) User ID: 51941339 United States 01/01/2014 10:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 52312151 United States 01/01/2014 10:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Kirk User ID: 46623222 United States 01/01/2014 10:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
s3krtsqrl User ID: 48327223 United States 01/01/2014 10:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
O Dog of Maddness User ID: 51098790 United States 01/01/2014 10:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TheTruthMonger (OP) User ID: 51941339 United States 01/01/2014 10:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why are military targets hit in the 2000 warhead scenario but not in the 500? I think they have this 100% backwards Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52312151 Maybe the main goal in global thermonuclear warfare is to destroy as many people / infrastructure as possible with secondary targets being military? Interesting question |
ClydeX User ID: 11310285 United States 01/01/2014 11:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I dont get what could be in Montana and N Dakota that would make them so targeted? Or the cluster in colorado/nebraska/wyoming? Quoting: TheTruthMonger All of the silos we have thats why the attacks are clustered there Quoting: Anonymous Coward 21223542 Yes Please explain why the 2,000 war head is a black blotch and the 500 warhead is a purple triangle which would be a larger area. 500 is less than 2,000, inquiring mind wants to know. Quoting: catninetails What it is showing is if 500 bombs were to be used in an attack, the likely targets would be those marked by the triangles. If 2000 bombs happened to be used, those strikes are denoted by the black circles. The projected targets in a supposed 500 bomb attack would still be targets in a 2000 bomb attack, which is why you see those particular targets with both symbols. Job 12:7) But ask now the beasts, and they shall teach thee; and the fowls of the air, and they shall tell thee: 8) Or speak to the earth, and it shall teach thee: and the fishes of the sea shall declare unto thee. |
Kirk User ID: 46623222 United States 01/01/2014 11:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why are military targets hit in the 2000 warhead scenario but not in the 500? I think they have this 100% backwards Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52312151 Maybe the main goal in global thermonuclear warfare is to destroy as many people / infrastructure as possible with secondary targets being military? Interesting question If things go properly the tubes will be empty when theirs arrive. Government is a body largely ungoverned. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 4567599 United States 01/01/2014 11:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Fartster User ID: 29674192 United States 01/01/2014 11:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50486882 United States 01/01/2014 11:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Please explain why the 2,000 war head is a black blotch and the 500 warhead is a purple triangle which would be a larger area. 500 is less than 2,000, inquiring mind wants to know. Quoting: catninetails I think they're referring to the number of missiles/bombs launched, not the size of them. Okay, got it and yes I'm toast :( |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25360940 United States 01/01/2014 11:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why are military targets hit in the 2000 warhead scenario but not in the 500? I think they have this 100% backwards Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52312151 Maybe the main goal in global thermonuclear warfare is to destroy as many people / infrastructure as possible with secondary targets being military? Interesting question My mos in the army. First targets military,industrial,then civilian. |
TheTruthMonger (OP) User ID: 51941339 United States 01/01/2014 11:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why are military targets hit in the 2000 warhead scenario but not in the 500? I think they have this 100% backwards Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52312151 Maybe the main goal in global thermonuclear warfare is to destroy as many people / infrastructure as possible with secondary targets being military? Interesting question My mos in the army. First targets military,industrial,then civilian. Got it. I think kirk made a good point that the silos may not even be primary targets at all since they should be empty |
Frayed Knot User ID: 35406953 United States 01/01/2014 11:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Please explain why the 2,000 war head is a black blotch and the 500 warhead is a purple triangle which would be a larger area. 500 is less than 2,000, inquiring mind wants to know. Quoting: catninetails I think they're referring to the number of missiles/bombs launched, not the size of them. Okay, got it and yes I'm toast :( Me too. Right next to an AFB. I have long feared that my sins would return to visit me, and the cost is more than I can bear. - The Patriot |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 52300876 United States 01/01/2014 11:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pretty interesting map showing likely targets in a 2000 or 500 nuclear warhead attack scenario. Quoting: TheTruthMonger How would you fare? [link to www.thesurvivalistblog.net] The whole concept is wrong. The Elite can't let this happen as it would hurt their chances of ruling the world. Since most, if not all World leaders are their puppets, it has no chance of occurring. It is just used to scare you, so they can justify big military expenditures. While they and their buddies laugh all the way to the bank. |
TheTruthMonger (OP) User ID: 51941339 United States 01/01/2014 11:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pretty interesting map showing likely targets in a 2000 or 500 nuclear warhead attack scenario. Quoting: TheTruthMonger How would you fare? [link to www.thesurvivalistblog.net] The whole concept is wrong. The Elite can't let this happen as it would hurt their chances of ruling the world. Since most, if not all World leaders are their puppets, it has no chance of occurring. It is just used to scare you, so they can justify big military expenditures. While they and their buddies laugh all the way to the bank. Maybe youre onto something there! Control via fear |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25360940 United States 01/01/2014 11:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 50642100 United States 01/01/2014 11:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
s3krtsqrl User ID: 48327223 United States 01/01/2014 11:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pretty interesting map showing likely targets in a 2000 or 500 nuclear warhead attack scenario. Quoting: TheTruthMonger How would you fare? [link to www.thesurvivalistblog.net] The whole concept is wrong. The Elite can't let this happen as it would hurt their chances of ruling the world. Since most, if not all World leaders are their puppets, it has no chance of occurring. It is just used to scare you, so they can justify big military expenditures. While they and their buddies laugh all the way to the bank. Maybe youre onto something there! Control via fear Completely agree. Very unlikely scenario, but still an interesting graphic. |
Simple27 User ID: 51550563 United States 01/01/2014 11:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TheTruthMonger (OP) User ID: 51941339 United States 01/01/2014 11:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |