5years in prison and/or $250,000 in fines for to coach people into this fabulous obamacare!

Tires ain't cheap, buying online at discount tire direct and having them installed at a small shop has saved me money in the past.

I spent my Obamacare money on a Sig Sauer M400 assault rifle and ammo.

Die.

Precisely WRONG is more like it! Everyone here seems to be reading the verbiage of 42 USC § 18115 but after that event takes place, all semblance of reason and comprehension go right out the window.
Why is everyone so hung up on the words 'health insurance issuer' when they are ultimately IRRELEVENT when mentioned after the words "individual" and "company" in this sentence?
Let's back up a few steps shall we, and re-frame this sentence while leaving out the verbiage that is leading everyone to a false conclusion about what this "United States Code" is actually saying.
The descriptor words "business, nonprofit entity, or health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage" in this sentence are essentially redundant, unneeded, and confusing because they are only expressing slightly different iterations of the first two exempt items, which are "individuals" and "companies".
The words "individual" and "company" can be used interchangeably and synonymously with the words "Business", "nonprofit entity", and "health insurance issuer" in this context because those words are simply describing a general list of exempted entities beginning with "individuals" and "companies".
A "health insurance issuer", "nonprofit entity", and "business" are just elaborations of the words "individual" & "company" and therefore are not necessary nor do they provide any more relevant specificity within the context of this description.
They are, however, doing a bang up job of confusing people as far as its actual meaning, and I am sure this was quite by design.
So, let's re-frame this sentence to a simpler version that eliminates the unnecessary and confusing redundancies and phrase it thusly:
No individual or company shall be required to participate in any Federal health insurance program created under this Act (or any amendments made by this Act)...
I hope I have dazzled you with brilliance by removing the bullshit placed in this document by lawmakers who specifically designed it’s verbiage to baffle “we the people” and further muddy the understanding of its actual meaning.
So, despite the fact that users AC 52767878 and AC 51336755 were very creative in manufacturing lots of technically correct but entirely non-sequitur explanations to falsely convince everyone that only the 'health insurance issuers' are exempt from mandatory compliance with Obama care, upon closer examination we can see that they obviously picked the wrong day to stop smoking crack. :-)
K.I.S.S. - Keep It Simple, Stupid! - Something that lawmakers are incapable of doing if they want to continue making "laws" designed to keep an unsuspecting public ignorant of the web of deceit they are now and have been 'weaving' for a long time in order to advance their dark agendas.

Yeah, I am sure that will work out real good for ya.

Thanks all

Well now, you wouldn't know just how well that would "work out " would you ?

Last Edited by s. d. butler on 01/12/2014 02:33 AM

Double fence Republican (appointed by G. Bush) SCOTUS Judge Roberts made it a 'tax' so the IRS could be 'authorized' (sarc) to collect it from YOUR earnings via your income tax reporting. It is an insurance company bailout. Why? Because if you look at the new premiums the insurance companies are now charging 2x's MORE COST than the previous premiums before 1/1/2014. That alone should be criminal. 100% increase for F. WHAT? They have us over a barrel and are laughing to the bank and .gov is the enforcer. The insurance companies are making out like thieves on the ACA. THIEVES. And, the IRS/.gov is enforcing their theft. It's like a bounty hunter. The bondsman (Insurance Co) gets the person paying the large premiums in the bag and the IRS makes $, too by enforcing/collecting if the person who is supposed to be insured refuses, but is later collected on via 'tax' confiscation via your income tax filing.

AND, have access to your bank account for the Federal Govt Bailout such that Cyprus experienced.

Buy them on line? Right.

What part of he "can't afford them" is it you don't understand?

Like you think the Money Fairy is going to shit him 500 bucks?

Oh wait - I know maybe he can just sell one of his kidneys 'on line' for the scratch...... And if he sells the other one too maybe he can come up with Obalmies 15 FUCKING grand.