Prostitution is illegal!!! Attorney are not giving bad advice!!

Stop calling independent escorts “prostitutes.” They are NOT prostitutes because they don’t work for a pimp. Independent escorts who offer erotic services are SEX WORKERS AND NOT PROSTITUTES.

A prostitute is person who works for a pimp. It doesn’t matter if they get paid for sex or not. As long as the pimp that is arranging a sex act, they are considered a prostitute. It doesn’t matter if the pimp gets paid. The pimp can be a person who receives non-monetary favors.
When there is a pimp involved, the act is consider prostitution. Prostitution is commercial sex.
Not all street walkers are prostitutes. If they solicit on the street and there is no pimp, the act is considered loitering for soliciting sex acts. The solicitation on the streets is considered prostitution when there is a pimp involved.

I hope people will change their terminology to be in line with the legal terminology. Associating “escort services” and “escorts” with “prostitution” and “prostitute” gives escorts a bad name.

The words “prostitution” and “prostitutes” give a bad perception towards “escorts” and “escort service.”
When the police chief make the statement that prostitution is NOT a victimless crime, they are correct. Prostitution involves a pimp or a prostitution ring. Organized prostitution ring or pimping contributes to other crimes in a neighborhood.

“[3] A prostitute is defined as a woman who offers herself indiscriminately to sexual intercourse for hire (People v. Romo, 200 Cal.App.2d 83, 90, 19 Cal.Rptr. 179; People v. Phillips, 70 Cal.App.2d 449, 452, 160 P.2d 872).” - PEOPLE of the State of California, v. Calvin Willie ROBISON, 4 Cal.App.3d 1014

“hire. vb. To employ a person for labor or services. A bailment, where compensation is to be given the use of a thing, or for labor or services about it. The contract of letting and hiring is usually divided into two kinds; first, Locatio, or Locatio conductio rei, the bailment of a thing to be used by the hirer, for compensation to be paid by him. Secondly, Locatio operis, or the hire of the labor and services of the hirer, for a compensation to be paid by the letter. ” -Dean’s Law Dictionary

“A case might be made for limiting the offense of prostitution to “promiscuous” sexual activity for hire. 25 Requiring promiscuity as well as hire would, for example, bar prosecution of a mistress who is supported by her lover. Such situations fall somewhat outside the target evils of our Section, but the “hire” requirement itself is probably a sufficient safeguard, since the lover’s financial contributions in these relationships are more likely to be interpreted as gifts out of general affection rather than “hire” for sexual activity.” -MPC Comment pg.175 (12)

The statement “Do as thou wilt is the whole of the law. Love under will. Love under will” doesn’t grant the right to pimp someone. The decision to have sex should be a personal decision and not based on another. A pimp is imposing his or her will on the person under them. There is no constitutional right to liberty to engage in prostitution under the 14th amendment. The liberty is not personal but based on a pimp with or without prostitution ring.

By making a legal argument in court there is a constitutional right to patronize a prostitute, the defendant or the plaintiff is asking the court to grant a constitutional right to patronize a pimp or a person working for a pimp. The courts have ruled there is no constitutional right to patronize a prostitute because prostitution is a commercial activity. The pimp creates a commercial sex situation. I have not seen a court case where the judge ruled on the right to patronize a sex worker.

Prostitution is illegal. That is correct. No attorney is giving bad advice by stating that prostitution is illegal. If an independent escort did not rebut the presumption of the pimp, they are admitting to prostitution (depend on the state). Just remember there can an imaginary or fictional pimp that can exist in the legal system unless rebutted.
This is not a word game. My definition of “prostitute” and “prostitution” is based on court decisions. An allegory is the difference between asking for “hamburger” vs. “hotdogs.”
Not legal advice. For educational purpose only!!

www.sugarcitizens.net