This ex-military whistleblower blows the lid off the Chemtrail conspiracy!

Not everyone forgets what a douchbag you are NOBLE. But keep on trying, you might get some brain dead losers like yourself to agree with you.

Gotta run, workday is over and my beautiful wife awaits. You keep on doing what your good at...being a douchebag.

No it proves you are worthless and insignificant with nothing better to do pretty much.

Irony at its finest

The problem here is what's considered reputable. You Chemtards consider anything that agrees with your beliefs as reputable, where normal intelligent people rely on the scientific method.


Let me guess...you're also a creationist...right?

And what part of "I never claimed to be an expert" do you fail to understand? Where do you see any such claim?

You are so far off Noble, the Hubble couldn't see you.

The programs exist and have been used, (proven)you admit aircraft are the best delivery system, and the leading man in the field of geoengineering, who has his doctorate from Harvard I might add, (more reputable than a GLP troll), has been pushing publicly for this (fact), and you want everyone to believe one has nothing to do with each other? You are blind to the facts Taco Boy!
Billions have been spent on this and is continuing to be spent yet no one has or is spraying anything? Anywhere? And I never said all trails are chemtrails or all planes are spraying. Someone is though even if on a small scale and you can't admit that this is being done. You can't have it both ways. Look up how many millionaires and billionaires have invested in this very same thing. Look at the climate change agenda, It's out in the open now!
You have been given names, places , pictures, patents, program and operation names, chemicals and how they are used, where they have been used and on whom, as well as many more pieces to the puzzle over the last couple of years from what I've seen here and downright refuse to acknowledge any of it. It is you that cannot or will not comprehend facts which is why you will continue to flip tacos.
The only person who can open your eyes is you. If you refuse to do so, you will never see. Owning The Weather By 2025 PDF. You can download it anywhere and it is public. Read it

[link to csat.au.af.mil]


^^^^Anyone else who'd like a good read can find it here^^^^^

But all that and the trails in the sky, which are what people call "chemtrails", have nothing to do with each other, that's my claim, no show me how science, the scientific method and peer review prove me wrong.

And I'm so glad that you have no idea what Owning the Weather by 2025 actually was. It just proves my point.

And the fact that you patents as evidence is theicing on the cake.

You are, in fact, an idiot.

Just a few clips for you Taco Boy. This is from 1996 but it's not being done right?


A number of methods have been explored or proposed to modify the ionosphere, including injection of chemical vapors and heating or charging via electromagnetic radiation or particle beams (such as ions,
27
neutral particles, x-rays, MeV particles, and energetic electrons).
techniques to modify the upper atmosphere have been successfully demonstrated experimentally. Ground- based modification techniques employed by the FSU include vertical HF heating, oblique HF heating,
28
microwave heating, and magnetospheric modification. Significant military applications of such operations
include low frequency (LF) communication production, HF ducted communications, and creation of an
artificial ionosphere (discussed in detail below). Moreover, developing countries also recognize the benefit
of ionospheric modification: “in the early 1980’s, Brazil conducted an experiment to modify the ionosphere
29 by chemical injection.”

1
A pilot program known as Project Popeye conducted in 1966 attempted to extend the monsoon season
in order to increase the amount of mud on the Ho Chi Minh trail thereby reducing enemy movements. A silver iodide nuclei agent was dispersed from WC-130, F4 and A-1E aircraft into the clouds over portions of the trail winding from North Vietnam through Laos and Cambodia into South Vietnam. Positive results during this initial program led to continued operations from 1967 to 1972. While the effects of this program remain disputed, scientists believe it resulted in a significant reduction in the enemy’s ability to bring supplies into South Vietnam along the trail. E. M. Frisby, “Weather-modification in Southeast Asia, 1966–1972,” The
Journal of Weather-modification 14, no. 1 (April 1982): 1—3.

Current technologies that will mature over the next 30 years will offer anyone who has the necessary resources the ability to modify weather patterns and their corresponding effects, at least on the local scale. Current demographic, economic, and environmental trends will create global stresses that provide the impetus necessary for many countries or groups to turn this weather-modification ability into a capability.
In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications.

Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels. These levels could include unilateral actions, participation in a security framework such as NATO, membership in an international organization such as the UN, or participation in a coalition. Assuming that in 2025 our national security strategy includes weather-modification, its use in our national military strategy will naturally follow. Besides the significant benefits an operational capability would provide, another motivation to pursue weather-modification is to deter and counter potential adversaries.

Keep on thinking that. Doesn't bother me near as much as you hope douche. Your opinion of anything means absolutely nothing to me or most of the people who come into contact with you.

A research paper produced for the United States Air Force written in 1996 speculates about the future use of nanotechnology to produce "artificial weather", clouds of microscopic computer particle all communicating with each other to form an intelligent fog that could be used for various purposes. "Artificial weather technologies do not currently exist. But as they are developed, the importance of their potential applications rises rapidly." Weather modification technologies are described in an unclassified academic paper written by airforce officer-cadet students as "a force multiplier with tremendous power that could be exploited across the full spectrum of war-fighting environments." [3]

Look these people up that wrote it.


A Research Paper Presented To
Air Force 2025
by
Col Tamzy J. House
Lt Col James B. Near, Jr. LTC William B. Shields (USA) Maj Ronald J. Celentano Maj David M. Husband Maj Ann E. Mercer
Maj James E. Pugh
August 1996


But none of this is real? That's what you'd have everyone here believe?

We are 18 years past that paper being written. I understand the Air Force didn't write it, so called cadets did. Cadets? Did you notice their ranks? They were cadets in meteorology, Not cadets new to the military.
The subjects, uses,and technologies mentioned were not fiction by any means. You can look these up along with their patents along with dates of manufacturing which establish a time line all the way back to the 50's.

A small group of leading climate scientists, financially supported by billionaires including Bill Gates, are lobbying governments and international bodies to back experiments into manipulating the climate on a global scale to avoid catastrophic climate change.

"The scientists, who advocate geoengineering methods such as spraying millions of tonnes of reflective particles of sulphur dioxide 30 miles above earth, argue that a "plan B" for climate change will be needed if the UN and politicians cannot agree to making the necessary cuts in greenhouse gases, and say the US government and others should pay for a major programme of international research."

The Central Intelligence Agency is funding a scientific study that will investigate whether humans could use geoengineering to alter Earth's environment and stop climate change. The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) will run the 21-month project, which is the first NAS geoengineering study financially supported by an intelligence agency. With the spooks' money, scientists will study how humans might influence weather patterns, assess the potential dangers of messing with the climate, and investigate possible national security implications of geoengineering attempts.

OGP Research

There is a wide range of geoengineering research being conducted at the University of Oxford.

Some of this research is being conducted by the Oxford Geoengineering Programme, while other research is funded through two EPSRC/NERC funded projects – SPICE and IAGP.

The OGP has provided 'seedcorn' funding to help stimulate small projects in the area of geoengineering at the University of Oxford. A call for proposals was made in 2011 and three projects were selected and are now underway. These projects are in the areas of:

Assessing proposals for cloud modification
Enhancing Oxford's role as a leader in geoengineering governance research
The engineering and and resource constraints of CDR
In addition to these projects OGP is engaged in three other research projects in areas of:

Geoengineering governance
Enhanced weathering
Ocean alkilinity enhancement
The OGP provides funding to two post-doctoral researchers whose work covers these three areas of research.

This?

My total estimate comes out to around $10 million/year. Key (uncertain) assumptions include:
Continued support from Bill Gates for FICER at ~$1.5 million/year
50% of SCRiM's main NSF grant is devoted to geoengineering research. The grant is mentioned as a source of support for GeoMIP but the 50% figure is pulled out of nowhere.
Programs I know of but don't have any funding info for include:
Finland's COOL
IASS' Investigation and Assessment of Geo-Engineering Approaches which influence the Composition of the Atmosphere
Exeter's G360

Link: [link to osdir.com]

:)

How does that prove the trails are a product of geoengineering and not just persistent contrails?

Oh yeah, it doesn't!

Also, none of that proves that geoengineering is physically taking place. It just shows that people are researching the possibility.
Add "research" to the list of things you are ignorant and paranoid about.

I have never denied that thereare people researching this subject. My claim is thetthevisible trails we see are unrelated to geoengineering research and are just persistent contrails.

You can post all the geoengineering links/discussions/assumptions you want but it will NOT be proof that the trails we all see are anything more than a normal byproduct of hydrocarbon combustion through jet engines within an atmosphere which is saturated with respect to ice!

I'm sorry that you are unable to understand that these two things (geoengineering and the trails in the sky) are completely unrelated to each other.

...in bed ;)

What is your evidence that this isn't just an image of contrail cirrus?

Doubtful.

The new wood stoves are going to help this out as they are brought into the air craft fleet. If California would allow logging, more seasoned wood could be delivered to the air lines, instead they need to rely on green wood that produces more smoke and more of your "chemtrails".

Fixed it for ya Taco Boy!