Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,702 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,281,236
Pageviews Today: 2,067,317Threads Today: 654Posts Today: 14,166
05:37 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.

 
Itcouldbeaname

User ID: 25640766
United States
02/03/2014 05:45 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
[link to www.theweatherspace.com]

Anyone in the 'highlight' hearing stuff on AM/FM?
"We're chained to the world and we all gotta pull." - Tom Waits

Own your mind.

Standing firm in the War of Information.

Past-Present.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 53843351
United States
02/03/2014 05:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
[link to www.theweatherspace.com]

Anyone in the 'highlight' hearing stuff on AM/FM?
 Quoting: Itcouldbeaname


What does the white area mean.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 39817436
02/03/2014 06:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
What should someone listen for on am radio in the White area ..just frequency sounds which drown out stations?
beeches

User ID: 28167778
United States
02/03/2014 06:07 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
I assume it means high intensity of haarping, but that is only an assumption.
Now is the time.
Wildthing

User ID: 40964832
United States
02/03/2014 06:21 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
I've seen it before....during super storm sandy and in the oklahoma area when there was a historic number of tornadoes in one day...I think it was about 63 or so. Happened a couple of years ago. It means the level has gone higher than their equipment measures.

The signals should be subsiding soon from what I'm seeing on other sites.

As far as the woodpecker sounds. I hear them on my kindle fire pretty frequently. I normally listen to WOWO 1190 AM out of Ft. Wayne, IN.

Last Edited by Wildthing on 02/03/2014 06:23 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33103888
United States
02/03/2014 06:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
[link to www.theweatherspace.com]

Anyone in the 'highlight' hearing stuff on AM/FM?
 Quoting: Itcouldbeaname


Looks like they want to keep that storm from hitting Hotlanta again....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 39817436
02/03/2014 06:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
We are forecasted here in Illinois to get up to 11 inches by Wednesday morning and another 7-10 inches Friday night.
So then this snow being manufacturered by HARP?1dunno1
Wildthing

User ID: 40964832
United States
02/03/2014 06:28 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
[link to www.theweatherspace.com]

Anyone in the 'highlight' hearing stuff on AM/FM?
 Quoting: Itcouldbeaname


Looks like they want to keep that storm from hitting Hotlanta again....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33103888


I disagree, they've been hitting this area since before Jan 23rd. There's some answers to your questions here... [link to www.facebook.com (secure)]
aHEMagain
Anomalist/Conspiracy Researcher

User ID: 37804740
United States
02/03/2014 06:30 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
[link to www.theweatherspace.com]

Anyone in the 'highlight' hearing stuff on AM/FM?
 Quoting: Itcouldbeaname

theweatherspace.com HAARP coverage would be fraudulent, if he charged for it. Since he gives it away free he avoids any lawsuits.

He doesn't have 28 HAARP monitoring stations. Ask him for the address of one to visit. Ask what protocol he's using to derive a vector map. Ask any details you think would prove the information is real. No proof will be forthcoming.

He makes the maps up from weather reports.

If you want to see real data you'll have to look at magnetometers yourself. Here is a good site to use, you can input dates and change the range to see the field strength over different time periods.

[link to www.glcoherence.org]

aHEMagain

ps: it doesn't have a map, as far as I know, there is no system which could derive a meaningful map to localize magnetic fluctuations.

Last Edited by aHEMagain on 02/03/2014 06:32 PM
Wildthing

User ID: 40964832
United States
02/03/2014 06:36 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
[link to www.theweatherspace.com]

Anyone in the 'highlight' hearing stuff on AM/FM?
 Quoting: Itcouldbeaname

theweatherspace.com HAARP coverage would be fraudulent, if he charged for it. Since he gives it away free he avoids any lawsuits.

He doesn't have 28 HAARP monitoring stations. Ask him for the address of one to visit. Ask what protocol he's using to derive a vector map. Ask any details you think would prove the information is real. No proof will be forthcoming.

He makes the maps up from weather reports.

If you want to see real data you'll have to look at magnetometers yourself. Here is a good site to use, you can input dates and change the range to see the field strength over different time periods.

[link to www.glcoherence.org]

aHEMagain
 Quoting: aHEMagain


It's so sad to see someone who is obviously clueless defame a person.

That being said, HaarpStatus has been around for years. The network has been around for years. It has only been recently that Weatherspace took it over.

aHEMagain, I would like you to tell everyone what would happen to them if the goverlnment found out that a monitor was located at their home. Do you think the government would go out and reward them for it? And you think this information should be exposed? This is a proprietary system with VOLUNTEERS around the country. How shameful that you should act this way!

As far as "listening to weather forecasts"....that statement shows your COMPLETE IGNORANCE on the subject of HAARP. You should quit while you're ahead.
Itcouldbeaname (OP)

User ID: 25640766
United States
02/03/2014 06:53 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
[link to www.theweatherspace.com]

Anyone in the 'highlight' hearing stuff on AM/FM?
 Quoting: Itcouldbeaname

theweatherspace.com HAARP coverage would be fraudulent, if he charged for it. Since he gives it away free he avoids any lawsuits.

He doesn't have 28 HAARP monitoring stations. Ask him for the address of one to visit. Ask what protocol he's using to derive a vector map. Ask any details you think would prove the information is real. No proof will be forthcoming.

He makes the maps up from weather reports.

If you want to see real data you'll have to look at magnetometers yourself. Here is a good site to use, you can input dates and change the range to see the field strength over different time periods.

[link to www.glcoherence.org]

aHEMagain

ps: it doesn't have a map, as far as I know, there is no system which could derive a meaningful map to localize magnetic fluctuations.
 Quoting: aHEMagain


Appreciate the link, but I'd say multiple radio recieving sources picking up a similar signal and relaying its duration/intensity works pretty damn well for all practical reasons of being aware our weather is phony as shit.
"We're chained to the world and we all gotta pull." - Tom Waits

Own your mind.

Standing firm in the War of Information.

Past-Present.
Itcouldbeaname (OP)

User ID: 25640766
United States
02/03/2014 06:54 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
Even if only to confirm suspicions.
"We're chained to the world and we all gotta pull." - Tom Waits

Own your mind.

Standing firm in the War of Information.

Past-Present.
filth
Smash The State

User ID: 49575588
United States
02/03/2014 06:57 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
I believe that weather modification using haarp, chemtrails, and similar technology is real....without a doubt. Furthermore, I feel the evidence exists to prove as much. That being said, the weather space is a complete fraud. It's a sham. For anyone who doubts that, I suggest you read up on the history of the "organization" and those behind it. (One of which is a current glp poster). The haarp status info is entirely fabricated and a complete fucking joke.

Furthermore, I think for those of us who want to bring attention to the real issue of weather modification, when we cite or refer to sources such as the weather space, it ruins our credibility in the eyes of those we are trying to educate about weather modification. In other words, it destroys the legitimacy of our claims, arguments, and proof. Thus, we do a disservice to those trying to illuminate the issue and ultimately regress instead of progress in our efforts.
When the government’s boot is on your throat, whether it is a left boot or a right boot is of no consequence. – Gary Lloyd
mlabe
Wildthing

User ID: 40964832
United States
02/03/2014 06:57 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
Here's confirmation for you. [link to wdssii.nssl.noaa.gov]
aHEMagain
Anomalist/Conspiracy Researcher

User ID: 37804740
United States
02/03/2014 07:26 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
[link to www.theweatherspace.com]

Anyone in the 'highlight' hearing stuff on AM/FM?
 Quoting: Itcouldbeaname

theweatherspace.com HAARP coverage would be fraudulent, if he charged for it. Since he gives it away free he avoids any lawsuits.

He doesn't have 28 HAARP monitoring stations. Ask him for the address of one to visit. Ask what protocol he's using to derive a vector map. Ask any details you think would prove the information is real. No proof will be forthcoming.

He makes the maps up from weather reports.

If you want to see real data you'll have to look at magnetometers yourself. Here is a good site to use, you can input dates and change the range to see the field strength over different time periods.

[link to www.glcoherence.org]

aHEMagain
 Quoting: aHEMagain


It's so sad to see someone who is obviously clueless defame a person.

That being said, HaarpStatus has been around for years. The network has been around for years. It has only been recently that Weatherspace took it over.

aHEMagain, I would like you to tell everyone what would happen to them if the goverlnment found out that a monitor was located at their home. Do you think the government would go out and reward them for it? And you think this information should be exposed? This is a proprietary system with VOLUNTEERS around the country. How shameful that you should act this way!

As far as "listening to weather forecasts"....that statement shows your COMPLETE IGNORANCE on the subject of HAARP. You should quit while you're ahead.
 Quoting: Wildthing


Sorry that your an apologist for lies. Hate to burst your bubble, but I'm very familiar with HAARP, including that it was shut down in Alaska and most likely moved to a mobile platform.

USA, Russia, China, India and whole lot of other countries have ionospheric heater projects, and I have no doubt that weather wars are an on-going factor on the world stage.

Which is why this pisses me off so bad.

Let's be clear. How do you know what you're saying is true? I'll grant your point that there may be good reason for people to not want anyone finding out they were monitoring HAARP. Surely the website owner could put together a page on the technology used for this service, with some pictures of his monitoring setup and the equipment.

So absent anything other than the pretty pictures what have we got. Nothing.

Look, I'm not a skeptic or debunker. If this guy has something real and he wants to be taken seriously and he decides to put up a page describing how it all works I will applaud him and thank him for his efforts. I won't apologize for expressing doubts given the lack of any reason to believe it's real.

Final point. How does he create the Chemtrail forecasts? Does he have an insider giving him flight plans? Has he hacked into some scheduling system somewhere? Exactly how would you forecast where they are going to be chemtrailing? By making it up, the same as the HAARP status page.

aHEMagain
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 41125492
02/03/2014 07:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
[link to www.theweatherspace.com]

Anyone in the 'highlight' hearing stuff on AM/FM?
 Quoting: Itcouldbeaname

theweatherspace.com HAARP coverage would be fraudulent, if he charged for it. Since he gives it away free he avoids any lawsuits.

He doesn't have 28 HAARP monitoring stations. Ask him for the address of one to visit. Ask what protocol he's using to derive a vector map. Ask any details you think would prove the information is real. No proof will be forthcoming.

He makes the maps up from weather reports.

If you want to see real data you'll have to look at magnetometers yourself. Here is a good site to use, you can input dates and change the range to see the field strength over different time periods.

[link to www.glcoherence.org]

aHEMagain
 Quoting: aHEMagain


It's so sad to see someone who is obviously clueless defame a person.

That being said, HaarpStatus has been around for years. The network has been around for years. It has only been recently that Weatherspace took it over.

aHEMagain, I would like you to tell everyone what would happen to them if the goverlnment found out that a monitor was located at their home. Do you think the government would go out and reward them for it? And you think this information should be exposed? This is a proprietary system with VOLUNTEERS around the country. How shameful that you should act this way!

As far as "listening to weather forecasts"....that statement shows your COMPLETE IGNORANCE on the subject of HAARP. You should quit while you're ahead.
 Quoting: Wildthing
[link to www.youtube.com]
bsflag
Hey idiot it's kevin martin the biggest fraud on glp.You just fall off the turnip truck.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 41125492
02/03/2014 07:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
Here's confirmation for you. [link to wdssii.nssl.noaa.gov]
 Quoting: Wildthing


That ain't haarp that's incoming.Hit the deck.
aHEMagain
Anomalist/Conspiracy Researcher

User ID: 37804740
United States
02/03/2014 07:36 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
Here's confirmation for you. [link to wdssii.nssl.noaa.gov]
 Quoting: Wildthing


Well that's cool. It doesn't prove anything about the HAARP predictions, as this is showing recorded data, not projections. Yes, it has several of the radar spikes that have been associated with HAARP-like activity. I believe Dutchsince has done a great job of showing the correlation of those HAARP circles with certain weather patterns, but that's not predictive of future HAARP activity.

Aside from all that, what the hell are the things that look like a formation of planes going across the country? If they are planes, they must be pumping out a huge amount of material to create radar sigs that large.

I have seen this once before and was told it was a meteor shower. I don't buy it, those would be slow-moving meteors.

aHEMagain
Wildthing

User ID: 40964832
United States
02/03/2014 08:02 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
[link to www.theweatherspace.com]

Anyone in the 'highlight' hearing stuff on AM/FM?
 Quoting: Itcouldbeaname

theweatherspace.com HAARP coverage would be fraudulent, if he charged for it. Since he gives it away free he avoids any lawsuits.

He doesn't have 28 HAARP monitoring stations. Ask him for the address of one to visit. Ask what protocol he's using to derive a vector map. Ask any details you think would prove the information is real. No proof will be forthcoming.

He makes the maps up from weather reports.

If you want to see real data you'll have to look at magnetometers yourself. Here is a good site to use, you can input dates and change the range to see the field strength over different time periods.

[link to www.glcoherence.org]

aHEMagain
 Quoting: aHEMagain


It's so sad to see someone who is obviously clueless defame a person.

That being said, HaarpStatus has been around for years. The network has been around for years. It has only been recently that Weatherspace took it over.

aHEMagain, I would like you to tell everyone what would happen to them if the goverlnment found out that a monitor was located at their home. Do you think the government would go out and reward them for it? And you think this information should be exposed? This is a proprietary system with VOLUNTEERS around the country. How shameful that you should act this way!

As far as "listening to weather forecasts"....that statement shows your COMPLETE IGNORANCE on the subject of HAARP. You should quit while you're ahead.
 Quoting: Wildthing


Sorry that your an apologist for lies. Hate to burst your bubble, but I'm very familiar with HAARP, including that it was shut down in Alaska and most likely moved to a mobile platform.

USA, Russia, China, India and whole lot of other countries have ionospheric heater projects, and I have no doubt that weather wars are an on-going factor on the world stage.

Which is why this pisses me off so bad.

Let's be clear. How do you know what you're saying is true? I'll grant your point that there may be good reason for people to not want anyone finding out they were monitoring HAARP. Surely the website owner could put together a page on the technology used for this service, with some pictures of his monitoring setup and the equipment.

So absent anything other than the pretty pictures what have we got. Nothing.

Look, I'm not a skeptic or debunker. If this guy has something real and he wants to be taken seriously and he decides to put up a page describing how it all works I will applaud him and thank him for his efforts. I won't apologize for expressing doubts given the lack of any reason to believe it's real.

Final point. How does he create the Chemtrail forecasts? Does he have an insider giving him flight plans? Has he hacked into some scheduling system somewhere? Exactly how would you forecast where they are going to be chemtrailing? By making it up, the same as the HAARP status page.

aHEMagain
 Quoting: aHEMagain


How do I know it's real? Because I live in the area that's being targeted right now and I have pictures of the skies being haarped RIGHT NOW!. I take them on a daily basis and they coincide with the readings on haarpstatus.

How do I know it's real? Because I've been watching the site for years, along with storms that have been intensified in those areas that became deadly AFTER haarpstatus had been showing high readings in those areas and forecasted deadly storms LONG before the National Weather Service.

I've done my due diligence. You don't believe me....so what? Do you think I'm going to lose sleep over it?

I don't only look at haarp status, I look at the [link to www.glcoherence.org]

I looked at haarp alaska's waterfall graph before it was taken down

I look at the NOAA IR loops showing the NexRAD Signals.. [link to wdssii.nssl.noaa.gov]

I look at spacew.com to make sure we have no incoming CME's

I didn't fall off the turnip truck this morning. I don't look at JUST HaaarpStatus.

I take all of the information, take pictures, observe the activity, and put it all together. I've been doing this for many years. And because of my EXPERIENCE, I can tell you with confidence that Haarpstatus has been right, time after time after time.

It's very easy to sit here and defame someone or something. But I highly doubt any one of you have done the research or put the time into this that I have.
Wildthing

User ID: 40964832
United States
02/03/2014 09:02 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
Here are just a few of Haarpstatus's "successes" that I've documented

6.1 Eartn quake-California
[link to www.facebook.com (secure)]

Super Storm Sandy: [link to www.facebook.com (secure)]

[link to www.facebook.com (secure)]


[link to www.facebook.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 53400539
United States
02/03/2014 09:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
Martin is a fraud. Haarp Status is fraud status.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 53400539
United States
02/03/2014 09:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
hence why every image on haarp status is generated in photoshop....
Wildthing

User ID: 40964832
United States
02/03/2014 09:41 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
Here's confirmation for you. [link to wdssii.nssl.noaa.gov]
 Quoting: Wildthing


Well that's cool. It doesn't prove anything about the HAARP predictions, as this is showing recorded data, not projections. Yes, it has several of the radar spikes that have been associated with HAARP-like activity. I believe Dutchsince has done a great job of showing the correlation of those HAARP circles with certain weather patterns, but that's not predictive of future HAARP activity.

Aside from all that, what the hell are the things that look like a formation of planes going across the country? If they are planes, they must be pumping out a huge amount of material to create radar sigs that large.

I have seen this once before and was told it was a meteor shower. I don't buy it, those would be slow-moving meteors.

aHEMagain
 Quoting: aHEMagain


Those things are referred to as "radar" by most. You'll notice that the "radar" changes fairly often depending on which area it's "targeting". You'll also see "starbursts" as well. Again, we're told these are "radar". And they are to a certain extent. They are called "doppler radar" or "NEXRAD". Trouble is NEXRAD acts like mini "haarp stations" all over the country.

The best explanation I am able to come up with after researching and speaking to a few people is this.


Last Edited by Wildthing on 02/03/2014 09:45 PM
Wildthing

User ID: 40964832
United States
02/03/2014 09:44 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
Martin is a fraud. Haarp Status is fraud status.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 53400539


Cool, then based on the links I provided, explain how he fraudulently predicted the earthquake in Cali, and fraudulently came up with a haarp map showing haarp signals strengthening over the EXACT AREA THAT SUPER STORM SANDY HIT AN EFFING WEEK BEFORE IT HAPPENED!

I will be waiting for your answer, PLEASE HURRY!

Last Edited by Wildthing on 02/03/2014 09:44 PM
CaptRandom

User ID: 5775819
United States
02/03/2014 09:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
Watching you two go at it is kinda hot.
aHEMagain
Anomalist/Conspiracy Researcher

User ID: 37804740
United States
02/04/2014 05:20 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
Here are just a few of Haarpstatus's "successes" that I've documented

6.1 Eartn quake-California
[link to www.facebook.com (secure)]

Super Storm Sandy: [link to www.facebook.com (secure)]

[link to www.facebook.com (secure)]


[link to www.facebook.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Wildthing

None of your links work.

How many times has his HAARP status page shown the same thing that it showed the day of the 6.1 quake, but there was no quake?

How were you able to tell that what it showed before Super Storm Sandy was for a storm, and not an Earthquake?

If you like your psychic weatherman, you can keep your psychic weatherman. Just don't try to pretend that it's real science.

As to the radar link, thank you, I know what radar installations look like. The thing I was describing isn't showing any more. It was more than a dozen large streaks moving from the East Coast of Canada to West Coast of Mexico. Like a fleet of planes spewing Chemtrails.

aHEMagain
#Geomagnetic_Storm#
"Amateur Meteorologist"

User ID: 44557506
02/04/2014 05:40 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: I've never seen TheWeatherSpace's frequency detection go WHITE.
[link to www.theweatherspace.com]

Anyone in the 'highlight' hearing stuff on AM/FM?
 Quoting: Itcouldbeaname

theweatherspace.com HAARP coverage would be fraudulent, if he charged for it. Since he gives it away free he avoids any lawsuits.

He doesn't have 28 HAARP monitoring stations. Ask him for the address of one to visit. Ask what protocol he's using to derive a vector map. Ask any details you think would prove the information is real. No proof will be forthcoming.

He makes the maps up from weather reports.

If you want to see real data you'll have to look at magnetometers yourself. Here is a good site to use, you can input dates and change the range to see the field strength over different time periods.

[link to www.glcoherence.org]

aHEMagain

ps: it doesn't have a map, as far as I know, there is no system which could derive a meaningful map to localize magnetic fluctuations.
 Quoting: aHEMagain


^This!!!!!!!

News