Initial DNA analysis of Paracas elongated skull released – with incredible results

Is there any "official" scientific source for this news other than ancient-origins or even beforeitsnews?!...
Please?... I will only believe this if it hits MSMedia...Sorry...Too much deception around...(not that I believe MSMedia more!LOL Not at all!But you know what I mean!)

I don't think this has anything to do with Peter Pan!

Good video!

So further tests are done and if the scientist who does the analyses is comfortable, the scientist will address to public. He just wants more results first so whatever the verdict is, it can't be torn apart by skeptics. Sounds reasonable.

There will be a fundraising set up within the next two moths and volunteer scientists are being asked to join and help with research.

Been at [link to hiddenincatours.com] Can't wait for those conferences to come out!

Yes! And that's why we cannot see this on MSMedia.Yet.

~I will look more into Brien Foerster work.

He tells why, its so hard to get DNA from 2000 year old skull rather than blood from someone living now.

Plus the analysis is costly and fundraising had to be done.. Two years it took for the initial results, its complicated analyzing.

Watch the video, its well explained

Nephilim

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Yup. It took forever for anyone to be able to extract DNA from Starchild skull. [link to www.starchildproject.com]

The level of retard in this thread is staggering. They are not aliens, or hybrids. Here is 10x more proof than any of you have posted. This thread has become a circle jerk or delusional minds.
Its simply primitive tribal cultures purposely deforming their childrens skulls at a young age. WTF is wrong with all of you?

[link to en.wikipedia.org]



[link to imgur.com]
[link to imgur.com]
[link to imgur.com]

[link to sasquatchgenomeproject.org]

You would think that the mainstream academic would be all over it but they chose to ridicule the study instead without actually looking into it.

Wow. You are truly a retard. Lol. A retard calling others retard.

I´d say a lot of people are interested in, yes. But analyses is expensive, and who would believe a just grad student? Nobody has looked more into the skulls for 70 years. The deformed head was thought to be due to binding and not much research had been done into it.

With so many unsolved things in our world, it isn't really surprising that not everyone is concentrating on the skulls

So Forster is investigating them and does has a scientist plus another scientist parallel carrying out the tests. That scientist obviously doesn't want to be named yet, but will come forward with the results after more tests.

Exactly

"It is well-known that most cases of skull elongation are the result of cranial deformation, head flattening, or head binding, in which the skull is intentionally deformed by applying force over a long period of time. It is usually achieved by binding the head between two pieces of wood, or binding in cloth. However, while cranial deformation changes the shape of the skull, it does not alter its volume, weight, or other features that are characteristic of a regular human skull.
The Paracas skulls, however, are different. The cranial volume is up to 25 percent larger and 60 percent heavier than conventional human skulls, meaning they could not have been intentionally deformed through head binding/flattening. They also contain only one parietal plate, rather than two. The fact that the skulls’ features are not the result of cranial deformation means that the cause of the elongation is a mystery, and has been for decades. "

I'm interested. Explain the one parietal plate by your theory of skull flattening by boards.

There are quiet a few elongated skulls around the world. There are skulls which are deformed tribal. This is proven. That why it was initially thought it was the same with the Paracas skulls and there was no more investigation about it.

After a few years, people took up studies again about the Paracas people and examining the skulls they found other oddities which sparked interest and led to more investigation.

So, whats wrong with that? You strike me like a "all swans are white" type of person....

Easy, whoever claimed that was full of shit, just like the rest of you.

Asked the people who dismissed investigation and not me why that didn't sparked more interest...

But look at it from the other perspective as well, skulls found in the 1920s, even if scientists thought it was odd, what where they supposed to do?

So the skulls sat somewhere collecting dust, until someone came along who took up investigation

:klingonface33:

Anyone that uses Wikipedia as a source for an argument should be BANED!

Really? Well geez. Now that the initial DNA investigation has such interesting, promising results, you would think that the grant funding and scientists interested in further testing would be rushing in to claim one of the greatest discoveries of science.

But that won't happen. This initial discovery will be fought tooth and nail by the scientific establishment for the next twenty years or until someone determines it time to tell people that perhaps we didn't evolve from monkeys.

Very cogent question.

Also WHERE is the actual genetic sequences for these elongated skulls. They talk about "we have the genetic sequences" but where the hell are they? I want them. I am able to go blast them and determine origin, relatives, distance trees, evolutionary timelines, etc. So WHERE ARE THE SEQUENCES?

I like the part not in any known database,
or related to anything...

Thread: Alien DNA Identified In Paracas Elongated Skulls

...

Nephilium....