The US tested an atomic bomb on Tuesday

They'll never learn.

Great Catch! Thanks for posting :)



and



Last Edited by AKObserver on 02/07/2014 02:29 AM

We should have tested it on Iran.

Yea that is a reliable news source!

re; "The US, in defiance of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty..."

oh no !!

iran will place SANCTIONS on us !!!


ha ha ha ha ha

Good one ! LOL !!

Sweet!

Atomic bombs are antiques. Why would they test an atomic bomb? Modern atomic based weapons are called nuclear devices. If this really happened and was picked up by international sensors, then what was detonated might have been a nuclear bomb confiscated from terrorists.

It's on their website

[link to nnsa.energy.gov]

and here too

[link to www.ladailypost.com]

This is a fake way to cover up fuckusima radation that's comming ashore

you nice how all the jingo-tards arrive, eh?

NUCLEAR TESTS affect you'all's ass.

Ass.

Dont this particular bomb has a nickname and isnt the ones we have over Europe. Something like silver something...Damn I was just reading something on these bombs!

actually the Aliens approved
of the test

the Aliens wanted to see the effects
of the devastation on Donald Trump's
toupee

This could spark a new nuclear arms race... way to go USA!

The bombs don't work to blow up cities but do work during deep ocean tests.

I know why. I Just wish they'd figure it out.

LaRouche has predicted that the US will force a nuclear conflagration with Russia in March.




Is this just the prep?

there were seismic readings also in various places recently, could it be related? they test underground, right? I am searching for more info, this is the only other thing I found so far, [link to www.defenseone.com] seems to be same text.

Thats who reported it. The ir at the end of the url is for Iran.
Here's the video embedded.

How convenient... now Iran can say we violated the nuke treaty so they don't have to hold to their agreement.

How are we different from North Korea at this point?

Our leader isn't as cool.

North Korea does not have
a Rothschild Central bank

HEHE....I like the "we would like to see what would happen if one were to accidentally be set off".

Notice how republican are against any spending in the country but you say war or weapons they jump on Obama coattail.

But the B-83, which is capable of destroying entire cities, is a much more powerful weapon than those the United States currently deploys in Europe.

"It truly is a megaton-class weapon -- it is the relic of the Cold War," Madelyn Creedon, assistant secretary of Defense for global strategic affairs, said at the Tuesday hearing. "The B-83 is not compatible with European aircraft and the idea of introducing a megaton warhead into Europe is almost inconceivable to me, so we need the B-61."

Air Force Gen. Robert Kehler, who heads the U.S. Strategic Command, said the B-61 life-extension program would enable the nation to reduce the number of B-83 warheads and eventually eliminate the more powerful weapon entirely. "That's what we will do … so we're not spending money twice," Kehler said.

If, however, the administration does not refurbish the B-61 as currently planned, it would then become necessary to conduct a separate life-extension program for the B-83, according to Donald Cook, NNSA deputy administrator for defense programs.

"We'd have to do compatibility with aircraft which don't currently fly it and we will not have the basis to do that at anywhere near the cost" of the planned B-61 refurbishment, Cook told the House lawmakers. "All I can say right now is it would be considerably more expensive in my opinion."

Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the Senate Appropriations Energy and Water Subcommittee, has raised concerns that the method of extending the life of the B-61 that the administration has chosen is not the least costly and risky option, and she has proposed cutting money for the program.

Arms control activists, meanwhile, have suggested that the plan amounts to the creation of a new nuclear weapon -- thereby conflicting with President Obama's vows to reduce atomic arms -- rather than a simple refurbishment.

Administration officials and House Republicans sought to refute these arguments this week.

The B-61 plan is "absolutely consistent with the president's goals," according to Creedon.

"It's very important to remember that there are sort of two points to all of this," she said. President Obama "has been very strong that the stockpile be safe, secure and reliable, and that it remain that way as long as there are any nuclear weapons.
[link to www.nti.org]
it seems to me how are talking here that they are planning to use these things in the next 5 years.

thank you for the links! the one at [link to www.ladailypost.com] says,

"“As long as the United States continues to have nuclear weapons, we must ensure that they remain safe, secure and effective without the use of underground nuclear explosive testing,” said NNSA Deputy Administrator for Defense Programs Don Cook. “The first full-system mechanical environmental test of the B61-12 is a significant achievement"

It was only a mechanical test, not an underground one I guess then? Still broke a treaty... but not the reason all the seismic activity...

State your justification for your opinion.

I believe Press TV has more credibility than any of the western news propaganda organizations. Obviously you are blinded by your allegiances.

Its called a message to russia and china