Mars rover and other space crap! How in the hell????? | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 20088401 United States 02/07/2014 10:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45081800 United States 02/07/2014 10:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 20088401 United States 02/07/2014 10:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 02/07/2014 11:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24941531 Netherlands 02/07/2014 11:14 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.science.uwaterloo.ca] |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 20088401 United States 02/07/2014 11:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 20088401 United States 02/07/2014 11:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No way images can travel that far and not lose data somewhere along the way. Too much radiation to interrupt the signals. Try again! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20088401 No way images can travel that far and not lose data somewhere along the way. Too much radiation to interrupt the signals. Try again! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20088401 |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 20088401 United States 02/07/2014 12:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 02/07/2014 12:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 20088401 United States 02/07/2014 12:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Already answered. Even amateurs can do it, with a sufficiently large dish. Your argument from personal incredulity is not proof nor is it logical. I get the feeling you're here to troll. Go somewhere else. No I'm not, I want to know how a signal can physically make it that far in space without disruption and radiation disturbance. It's ok if you don't know how it actually works Astro. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15740069 United States 02/07/2014 12:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No way images can travel that far and not lose data somewhere along the way. Too much radiation to interrupt the signals. Try again! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20088401 No way images can travel that far and not lose data somewhere along the way. Too much radiation to interrupt the signals. Try again! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20088401 They just resend the bits that the radiation fuzzez out. Have you ever downloaded a Torrent before ? |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 20088401 United States 02/07/2014 12:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16453458 United States 02/07/2014 12:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | No way images can travel that far and not lose data somewhere along the way. Too much radiation to interrupt the signals. Try again! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20088401 Your computer disk drives (and disc drives) are often constantly misreading data, it is just "corrected" in sophisticated ways that you don't know about. Here is a good example. Reed Solomon Error Correction: [link to en.wikipedia.org] Edit: ...and there appear to be programming errors on that page... |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 02/07/2014 12:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Already answered. Even amateurs can do it, with a sufficiently large dish. Your argument from personal incredulity is not proof nor is it logical. I get the feeling you're here to troll. Go somewhere else. No I'm not, I want to know how a signal can physically make it that far in space without disruption and radiation disturbance. It's ok if you don't know how it actually works Astro. You're starting with the assumption that it doesn't work. It does. It isn't magically "disrupted" just because there's "radiation" in space. Earth's atmosphere has air glow, but that doesn't mean that distant stars and galaxies can't be seen through it. Like I said, with a sufficiently large dish you can listen to distant probes yourself. [link to www.uhf-satcom.com] [link to www.uhf-satcom.com] If you want to study up on the subject, here's a good book on it: [link to ia600507.us.archive.org (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 20088401 United States 02/07/2014 12:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 20088401 United States 02/07/2014 12:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Already answered. Even amateurs can do it, with a sufficiently large dish. Your argument from personal incredulity is not proof nor is it logical. I get the feeling you're here to troll. Go somewhere else. No I'm not, I want to know how a signal can physically make it that far in space without disruption and radiation disturbance. It's ok if you don't know how it actually works Astro. You're starting with the assumption that it doesn't work. It does. It isn't magically "disrupted" just because there's "radiation" in space. Earth's atmosphere has air glow, but that doesn't mean that distant stars and galaxies can't be seen through it. Like I said, with a sufficiently large dish you can listen to distant probes yourself. [link to www.uhf-satcom.com] [link to www.uhf-satcom.com] If you want to study up on the subject, here's a good book on it: [link to ia600507.us.archive.org (secure)] Thanks but we are talking a 100 million miles. I'm not buying anything can travel that far with accuracy. |
bvndy User ID: 28706319 United States 02/07/2014 12:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16453458 United States 02/07/2014 12:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Still not telling me how a signal can travel a direct straight line in space over 100 million miles without getting off course. Space is fucking huge. The signal isn't Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20088401 What really bakes people's noodles is when you try to talk about "signals" "traveling" beyond "time" and "space." |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 20088401 United States 02/07/2014 12:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16453458 United States 02/07/2014 12:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dr. Astro Senior Forum Moderator User ID: 4211721 United States 02/07/2014 12:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Dr. Astro Already answered. Even amateurs can do it, with a sufficiently large dish. Your argument from personal incredulity is not proof nor is it logical. I get the feeling you're here to troll. Go somewhere else. No I'm not, I want to know how a signal can physically make it that far in space without disruption and radiation disturbance. It's ok if you don't know how it actually works Astro. You're starting with the assumption that it doesn't work. It does. It isn't magically "disrupted" just because there's "radiation" in space. Earth's atmosphere has air glow, but that doesn't mean that distant stars and galaxies can't be seen through it. Like I said, with a sufficiently large dish you can listen to distant probes yourself. [link to www.uhf-satcom.com] [link to www.uhf-satcom.com] If you want to study up on the subject, here's a good book on it: [link to ia600507.us.archive.org (secure)] Thanks but we are talking a 100 million miles. I'm not buying anything can travel that far with accuracy. As I thought, a typical troll. Well, the evidence shows it can, just fine. Until you explain why it is that even amateurs can do it, you've got nothing. |
MidnightAssassin User ID: 50488077 United States 02/07/2014 12:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Impossible? You're not the brightest bulb in the box are you OP? Q: How are the Voyager spacecraft able to transmit radio messages so far? A: [link to science.howstuffworks.com] "I am quite sure now that often, very often, in matters concerning religion and politics, a man's reasoning powers are not above the monkey's." ("Mark Twain in Eruption") |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16453458 United States 02/07/2014 12:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I recommend a brushing up on something first, before the stupidly easy shit... It fits in perfectly with the conspiracy angle of the forum... Thread: Corruption of Science: Destruction of the U.S. Constitution Who Cares If Neutrons Repel and Stars Make Hydrogen? Quoting: AkashicRecord Government by the people depends on public access to reliable information. The integrity of our government thus depends on the integrity of government science. For the past sixty-eight years the scientific community has lied to Congress about the energy (E) stored as mass (m) in cores of atoms, planets, stars and galaxies. Why? Fear and a deep sense of guilt and remorse for having released that energy to vaporize Hiroshima and Nagasaki and kill hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians on August 6 and 9, 1945 .. ...snip... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16453458 United States 02/07/2014 12:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Thread: A first-year Elementary school primer of "Nuclear Science" + First-year undergraduate primer in 1 post As a follow-up (or preliminary) to the "corruption of science / destruction of U.S. Constitution" thread, I'd like to share this ridiculously simple video. Quoting: AkashicRecord It is ridiculously simple, because it just is that simple. So here is the first-year elementary school primer (which could also be a children's book...): [link to www.youtube.com] ...and here is the first-year undergraduate primer: COMPOSITION OF THE SOLAR INTERIOR: INFORMATION FROM ISOTOPE RATIOS ABSTRACT Measurements are reviewed showing that the interior of the Sun, the inner planets, and ordinary meteorites consist mostly of the same elements: Iron, oxygen, nickel, silicon, magnesium, sulfur and calcium [1]. These results do not support the standard solar model. [link to www.omatumr.com] References: 1. Harkins W. D. (1917): The evolution of the elements and the stability of complex atoms, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 39, 856-879. ... (...ask me about the meta-physical and archetypal "versions.") |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 20088401 United States 02/07/2014 12:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Impossible? Quoting: MidnightAssassin You're not the brightest bulb in the box are you OP? Q: How are the Voyager spacecraft able to transmit radio messages so far? A: [link to science.howstuffworks.com] I read that it only mentions giant antennas. Ok great big antennas . You mean they can send a signal that far with no disruption? Space is constantly changing shape and direction. The signal would get off track. |
Tasty THC User ID: 33226973 Canada 02/07/2014 12:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Already answered. Even amateurs can do it, with a sufficiently large dish. Your argument from personal incredulity is not proof nor is it logical. I get the feeling you're here to troll. Go somewhere else. Great to see you around again astro :) Don’t rock the boat, she’s your lifeline out here. -LSDMTHC- |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16453458 United States 02/07/2014 12:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 20088401 United States 02/07/2014 12:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20088401 No I'm not, I want to know how a signal can physically make it that far in space without disruption and radiation disturbance. It's ok if you don't know how it actually works Astro. You're starting with the assumption that it doesn't work. It does. It isn't magically "disrupted" just because there's "radiation" in space. Earth's atmosphere has air glow, but that doesn't mean that distant stars and galaxies can't be seen through it. Like I said, with a sufficiently large dish you can listen to distant probes yourself. [link to www.uhf-satcom.com] [link to www.uhf-satcom.com] If you want to study up on the subject, here's a good book on it: [link to ia600507.us.archive.org (secure)] Thanks but we are talking a 100 million miles. I'm not buying anything can travel that far with accuracy. As I thought, a typical troll. Well, the evidence shows it can, just fine. Until you explain why it is that even amateurs can do it, you've got nothing. So you don't know either. Pasting websites with babble. Any troll can do that |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16453458 United States 02/07/2014 12:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 53542632 Puerto Rico 02/07/2014 12:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |