I think now it is most likely one of these three NWO intelligence/psych-ops/black-ops assets that killed the protesters with sniper fire. NWO has benefitted most, and no evidence links Yakunovich to shoot-innocents order.

If it were a Ukrainian force that killed innocents, to terrorize them into defeat, they would need greater force and more dead ... it was enough to shock and enrage, not enough to cower and defeat ....  In fact if your goal is to terrorize into submission, you would not use snipers - just masked gunmen, as they do in most crackdowns (where gov't is really responsible).  Snipers hide the culprits, so a false flag operation *has* to work this way.

I was always thinking too - why did the video footage I have seen always show separately police shooting (but *never* what at) and innocents being hit (but never by whom)?  Maybe it was the snipers that killed all the innocents and the police were shooting at the armed wing and/or defending themselves?  Does anyone have any video clearly showing it was police who took out all those protesters?

I also remember stories about "inactive" "ex-"IDF "training" the "self-defense forces".  They could either be the perps, or could have been placed there to provide cover if necessary for the true perps.

So certainly one cannot rule out false flag before independent investigation by neutral experts. Unfortunately I saw a BBC segment on British military intelligence doing analysis of location of Kiev snipers at invitation of the "opposition". Deck stacked? Gee, reminds me of Iraqi yellowcake documents ....