What New World Order was supposed to be...

In conspiracy forums people don't think much. They tend to take things out of the context, they seldomly check presented information and do further research. Nowadays, everybody seems to be immediatelly negatively wired to the term "New world order", however, what is it exactly?

It is what we make out of it on a collective basis, and it seems that we are all a greddy bunch, not able to evolve and let go of material things, which do not matter. How many houses and cars can you take with you after you die? What does it matter if you have an expensive watch? Why would somebody care? It seems we are still trapped in a hate-trap, and with low instincts.
How would you make a better world, without somehow getting rid of hateful and greedy people? Do not kill or harm them - just let them do it to themselves. That seems fair to me.
Just one manufactured event where all money disappears within seconds, and all of these hateful and greedy monsters will harm themselves - without anybody even touching them.
How much pain have they caused by laying off people just for an increased gain and higher share value of the company?


According to Alice Bailey and her book "The Externalisation of the Hierarchy, the New World Order would be a fair system for all of the humanity. She is often quoted out of the context, and people seem lazy to read books, so I will extract her vision about the New World Order:

1) The new world order must meet the immediate need and not be an attempt to satisfy some distant, idealistic vision.

2) The new world order must be appropriate to a world which has passed through a destructive crisis and to a humanity which is badly shattered by the experience.

3) The new world order must lay the foundation for a future world order which will be possible only after a time of recovery, of reconstruction, and of rebuilding.


4) The new world order will be founded on the recognition that all men are equal in origin and goal but that all are at differing stages of evolutionary development; that personal integrity, intelligence, vision and experience, plus a marked goodwill, should indicate leadership. The domination of the proletariat over the aristocracy and bourgeoisie, as in Russia, or the domination of an entrenched aristocracy over the proletariat and middle classes, as has been until lately the case in Great Britain, must disappear. The control of labor by capital or the control of capital by labor must also go.

5) In the new world order, the governing body in any nation should be composed of those who work for the greatest good of the greatest number and who at the same time offer opportunity to all, seeing to it that the individual is left free. Today the men of vision are achieving recognition, thus making possible a right choice of leaders. It was not possible until this century.

6) The new world order will be founded on an active sense of responsibility. The rule will be "all for one and one for all." This attitude among nations will have to be developed. It is not yet present.

7) The new world order will not impose a uniform type of government, a synthetic religion and a system of standardization upon the nations. The sovereign rights of each nation will be recognized and its peculiar genius, individual trends and racial qualities will be permitted full expression. In one particular only should there be an attempt to produce unity, and that will be in the field of education.

8) The new world order will recognize that the produce of the world, the natural resources of the planet and its riches, belong to no one nation but should be shared by all. There will be no nations under the category "haves" and others under the opposite category. A fair and properly organized distribution of the wheat, the oil and the mineral wealth of the world will be developed, based upon the needs of each nation, upon its own internal resources and the requirements of its people. All this will be worked out in relation to the whole.

9) In the preparatory period for the new world order there will be a steady and regulated disarmament. It will not be optional. No nation will be permitted to produce and organize any equipment for destructive purposes or to infringe the security of any other nation. One of the first tasks of any future peace conference will be to regulate this matter and gradually see to the disarming of the nations.


What exactly is evil about these 10 points? People will scream "This is communism", but most of the people on this planet have no idea about a really fair system. As she puts it, both Soviet communism and western capitalism have to go.
It is possible to have such world order, however, only when we evolve further.