Why Didn't The 9/11 Hijackers Pick A Nuclear Reactor?

Why not hit the Whitehouse??? Why not crash the Planes into the streets of NY. I bet the kill count would've been higher, and way more damage would've been done. Or why not Las Vegas???

Maybe the insurance had run out on the reactors in the area?

reactors are built to withstand 747s and fighter jets at mach speeds too.

Hitting the Pentagon was to take out our military leadership. Which showed little understanding of our military structure.

As far as reactors, hitting one with a plane may or may not have an effect. Most the the stuff you see at a nuke plant is not vital, meaning the critical structure would survive underground.

All that being said, I don't know what exactly happened on 9/11. I'm still open minded to possiblities. I only know what I saw with my own eyes.

Because there were no arab hijackers.

It was all a major black psyop operation, a grand coup if you will to form US imperialist policy at home and abroad but you knew that already, right?

its because the terrorists are dumb. it was pure luck that they managed to do as much damage as they did. you could see that bin laden was surprised and pleased. He kept praising allah on that film. He was amazed at how well his stooges lucked out.

hey 239, are you trying to wake us up?

Nuclear Reactors are very small targets, especially when flying a very un-manuverable plane from a thousand feet above. This is the reason the white house was probably not hit. It is also a very hard target and difficult to spot from above. Try using google earth. The pentagon is much easier to spot.

What I don't understand is why the terrorists attacked in the morning. There would have been a lot more people in the towers later on in the day.

As for shock and awe, this does not neccesarily mean striking a target that can cripple a region with radioactivity or power outages. Attacking high profile targets effects the morale of americans. When we see the twin towers being hit or the pentagon its just hard to believe because we always expected them to be safe.

I do not believe that the reactors are that well protective. If they say that the shell would be able to withstand a 747 I would hardly believe it.

How did the number crunchers decide at what value per square inch it would take to penetrate the shell?

Why weren't the jets scrambled?Inside job .

There were no arab hijackers. It was an inside job. The Pentagon was picked as a target to make it look like the military was a victim.

They picked the part of the pentagon to crash into very carefully. They even drew a white line on the pentagon lawn ahead of time to show the missile exactly where to go. Don't believe it?

Then get a copy of "Loose Change" and see the video for yourself. White line clearly shown on the lawn. Exactly matching the missile's path.

"You can fool some of the people ALL the time, you can fool all the people some of the time, but you can't fool All the people ALL the time."

seems that the "fooling all people all the time" option is, in fact, working

"show the missile where to go"

huh?

seeing-eye missiles?


i guess the dozens of eye wittnesses who SAW a jetliner impact the pentagon are in on the conspiracy.

we don't like questions Citizen !!

Where did you get the idea there were "dozens of eyewitnesses"? Not true.

Ask yourself this: with the pentagon covered inside and out with cameras, why don't pentagon officials show us a video of what happened? Because the pentagon doesn't want you to know the truth.

Haven't you seen the footage showing the original hole in the pentagon? It was only 16 feet wide and the roof had not fallen in yet. No way can a commercial airliner make such a tiny hole and leave NO wreckage behind.

Think, people!

the world trade center was full of asbestos and needed to come down anyways, this was far more profitable, in more ways than one

Um ... i guess i got the idea from THE INTERVIEWS OF THEM IN THE PAPER AND ON TV.

the Pentagon was constructed in WWII when it was assumed that it might come under airial attack. it was constructed to be blast resistant. even the windows. so the small hole is not surprising. the diameter of the hole is about the diameter of the fuselage. thats about right.

and Malu ..... since the bulk of the insurance $ is still tied up in court .... it hasn't yet been "profitable" to anybody.

Silver makes an excellent point. Why/how can one plane bring down a Tower, but make such a small hole at the Pentagon. The properties of jet fuel are that transitory?

We stupid.

because the pentagon was built to withstand bombardment from the air. THe WTC was designed to withstand a hit by a jetliner ( and it DID ) the combination of the impact damage and fire was tooo much. the WTC was a radical new design. NOT traditional "steel frame" construction. very very light for its size. traditional "steel frame" method would have made it too heavy to be self supporting and made for too little rentable space to make the project economically feasible.

You said: the diameter of the hole is about the diameter of the fuselage. thats about right.

If that's true, then why were there no wing and tail parts on the lawn? THEY couldn't have fit into that little 16' hole. Yet, not one single plane part was found, not a plane seat, no luggage, no body parts - NOTHING.

And how about that other 16' hole in the interior of the pentagon? Do you actually believe a commercial plane could plow through NINE FEET of CONCRETE? Only a missile can do that.

Think, people!

hmmmm nine feet of concrete ....makes for a pretty small hole.

so ... the aluminium parts smash down like a beer can and the heaviest most massive poarts go on through. fire melts the aluminium. that leaves small frgments that were dispersed across the lawn by the explosion and impact. there are lots of pictures of things like that. where's the problem?

and there are dozens of eyewittnesses who saw a jetliner impact the pentagon.

So you think the fire melted the entire plane and everything. OK.

Now tell me how they were able to do DNA testing on "bodies"? You are saying you believe the plane was totally destroyed by fire, yet the passengers weren't?

Think, people!

What Hijackers?

How much was on that one Trav? 64' was too early for me to have seen the story. I would like to read more on it if you have the chance.

To the person who said "16 foot hole in the Pentagon", you might wish to check on the diameter of a 767 fuselage.

The length of a Boeing 767 is 159 feet. You cannot tell me that the WHOLE 159 feet of the jet made it straight through that hole withOUT deviating from side to side as it connected with the building PLUS the wings which are 156 feet from tip to tip.

Some people believe a lot of evidence was destroyed that would have exposed the FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM SCAM that JFK was silenced for.

Doesn't everyone know this yet?

ALL BANK INTEREST IS A SCAM!

INCLUDING THE FEDERAL RESERVE est 1913

They (NWO) scammed a lot of dough from US AMERICANS.

Stan Plock
NAZI AMerica

3 months wages for taxes...
6 months wages for bank interest...

What's left?
Poverty!

Nuclear facilities are too far away from populations. The facilities that were hit, were to make a big impact on the population. I do know, that the targets impacted, made more influance than any nuclear power plant.

Well, whoever did it, hit the Trade Center and the Pentagon because they are symbolic.
Psychology.