Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,547 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 590,075
Pageviews Today: 755,737Threads Today: 207Posts Today: 2,555
06:40 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

The USA vs an Asymmetrical Multi-Front War

 
YouAreDreaming
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 10503161
Canada
03/03/2014 06:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
The USA vs an Asymmetrical Multi-Front War
Since 9/11, the USA has been engaged in an imperialistic takeover of the Middle-East using false-pretexts for attacking sovereign nations such as Iraq and Afghanistan. Unlike Russia, the USA did not go in peacefully but with shock and awe killing thousands of Civilians in the process. This oil-war has been the centre of the US military theatre for over 11 years and is still on-going with sights on Syria and Iran.

In November of 2013, China declared an ADIZ over disputed islands with Japan and has also been inching towards war. The US has firmly stated that it would support Japan should war break out.

North Korea has been belligerent and threatening to nuke the United States since April of 2013, with constant reminders that they are intent on attacking the USA with nuclear weapons, which has included a strategic nuclear strike map of select US cities. North Korea is not alone in releasing such a strategic map as China also has a nuclear strike map targeting US cities that it also has released.

Russia has been threatening to nuke Nato and the US, even placing nuclear missiles in Cuba before the Ukraine crisis over the Nato missile shield that it has viewed as weakening Russia and entrapping it.

Iran has now sent military ships close to the USA which is has never done prior in US/Iran relations, and China/Russia also have nuclear subs and ships lurking closer to the US shores.

How does bullying the world stack up? Never seems to work out for the aggressor, just look at Germany WWI/WWII. Slowly but surely other Nations start to target the bully and surround them strategically with offensive weaponry, in this case it's all entirely nuclear.

When in history has the US had this many looming threats all at once? Nuclear war from: China, Russia and North Korea and threats of war from Iran?

Is this the result of failed foreign policy on behalf of the US? What happens if the US shows weakness and even one of these enemies attack, does it not logically imply that they would all attack in different asymmetrical ways?

This is the dawn of the new world war and all the pieces have been falling into place to attack the US at home and abroad. When it starts, I do not believe the US can get out of this unscathed. It will be unlike anything we can imagine from prior wars, entire cities destroyed in a flash. The genuine threat of thermonuclear war has never been greater since the cold war.

Let's see how the US gets out of this one as we only see failed diplomacy from the White House.

--- Just some thoughts YAD.
YouAreDreaming  (OP)

User ID: 10503161
Canada
03/03/2014 06:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The USA vs an Asymmetrical Multi-Front War
hiding
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 43737545
United States
03/03/2014 06:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The USA vs an Asymmetrical Multi-Front War
Since 9/11, the USA has been engaged in an imperialistic takeover of the Middle-East using false-pretexts for attacking sovereign nations such as Iraq and Afghanistan.


I stopped reading right there. You're a douche and your post sucks.
YouAreDreaming  (OP)

User ID: 10503161
Canada
03/03/2014 06:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The USA vs an Asymmetrical Multi-Front War
Since 9/11, the USA has been engaged in an imperialistic takeover of the Middle-East using false-pretexts for attacking sovereign nations such as Iraq and Afghanistan.


I stopped reading right there. You're a douche and your post sucks.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 43737545


Because it's the truth, Iraq and Afghanistan had nothing to do with 9/11 what-so-ever and also had no weapons of mass destruction.

Considering all the terrorists were Saudis it looks like the wrong country was attacked after-all but hey the oil fields were secured in Iraq within the first 3 weeks and under the US control was being pumped out.

If the USA can do it, why not China or Russia, after all they are just following the lead of the US right?

Live by example I say.

Last Edited by YouAreDreaming on 03/03/2014 06:49 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 43737545
United States
03/03/2014 06:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The USA vs an Asymmetrical Multi-Front War
Since 9/11, the USA has been engaged in an imperialistic takeover of the Middle-East using false-pretexts for attacking sovereign nations such as Iraq and Afghanistan.


I stopped reading right there. You're a douche and your post sucks.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 43737545


Because it's the truth, Iraq and Afghanistan had nothing to do with 9/11 what-so-ever and also had no weapons of mass destruction.

Considering all the terrorists were Saudis it looks like the wrong country was attacked after-all but hey the oil fields were secured in Iraq within the first 3 weeks and under the US control was being pumped out.

If the USA can do it, why not China or Russia, after all they are just following the lead of the US right?

Live by example I say.
 Quoting: YouAreDreaming

We gave the Afghans a chance to hand over Bin Laden and they refused. Bad move on their part.

Iraq could have been handled differently but at the end of a day going in had nothing to do with WMDs and had everything to do with sending a message to the Saudis. Read "Americas Secret War" by George Friedman for conformation of this.

The Canadians sent some troops to Iraq, too as I recall...
YouAreDreaming  (OP)

User ID: 10503161
Canada
03/03/2014 07:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The USA vs an Asymmetrical Multi-Front War
Since 9/11, the USA has been engaged in an imperialistic takeover of the Middle-East using false-pretexts for attacking sovereign nations such as Iraq and Afghanistan.


I stopped reading right there. You're a douche and your post sucks.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 43737545


Because it's the truth, Iraq and Afghanistan had nothing to do with 9/11 what-so-ever and also had no weapons of mass destruction.

Considering all the terrorists were Saudis it looks like the wrong country was attacked after-all but hey the oil fields were secured in Iraq within the first 3 weeks and under the US control was being pumped out.

If the USA can do it, why not China or Russia, after all they are just following the lead of the US right?

Live by example I say.
 Quoting: YouAreDreaming

We gave the Afghans a chance to hand over Bin Laden and they refused. Bad move on their part.

Iraq could have been handled differently but at the end of a day going in had nothing to do with WMDs and had everything to do with sending a message to the Saudis. Read "Americas Secret War" by George Friedman for conformation of this.

The Canadians sent some troops to Iraq, too as I recall...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 43737545


I am not convinced that there really was an Osama Bin Laden in the way the US media created the character; that it was all wag-the-dog propaganda cooked up in a MIC think-tank to expand US hegemony on the middle-east. And that 9/11 was an inside-job, the US Reichstag to lull the US sheeple into supporting what would become one of the most criminal acts carried out by the US government.

Bush Jr. needed an excuse to finish Bush Sr. failed effort to over-throw Saddam and what a better excuse then create this terrorist boogie-man to get the job done. They were successful, took control of the Oil and in the process looted the hell out of the US economy before the end of Bush Jr's last term leaving a massive deficit and perpetual war for the next president to further expedite.

How the false-flag event of 9/11 justified these attacks on Iraq and Afghanistan come right from the pages of black-op shadow government warfare.

I think the work is waking up to how fallen the US has become into despotism and in fact has become very eerily similar to Nazi Germany and even North Korea in all these policy changes like the NDAA and the ability for Obama to over-ride Congress with Executive Orders. Now it's known as the US Police State and nearly everyone I know hates traveling to and from the US these days.

Most would rather do without a trip across those borders and rightfully so. Hard to hide the blatant fascism.

The US is not the good guys, not anymore. They are wolves in sheep clothing, and people are waking up to that fact.

It's also why I think Russia is finally ignoring Obama and engaging in this dangerous new provocation as he's not alone having China, North Korea and Iran also challenging US supremacy.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 43983948
United Kingdom
03/03/2014 07:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The USA vs an Asymmetrical Multi-Front War
You can feel tptb tickling your balls
YouAreDreaming  (OP)

User ID: 10503161
Canada
03/03/2014 07:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The USA vs an Asymmetrical Multi-Front War
You can feel tptb tickling your balls
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 43983948


Makes me feel so violated :(
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 6500947
United States
03/03/2014 07:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The USA vs an Asymmetrical Multi-Front War
Thread: Why didn't the USGS report this earthquake near Crimea, Ukraine?
Terrebonne

User ID: 55128227
United States
03/03/2014 08:38 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The USA vs an Asymmetrical Multi-Front War
bump
INFJ; We are the protectors.
YouAreDreaming  (OP)

User ID: 34048691
Canada
03/03/2014 11:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The USA vs an Asymmetrical Multi-Front War
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 15807959
United States
03/03/2014 11:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The USA vs an Asymmetrical Multi-Front War
Since 9/11, the USA has been engaged in an imperialistic takeover of the Middle-East using false-pretexts for attacking sovereign nations such as Iraq and Afghanistan.


I stopped reading right there. You're a douche and your post sucks.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 43737545


Because it's the truth, Iraq and Afghanistan had nothing to do with 9/11 what-so-ever and also had no weapons of mass destruction.

Considering all the terrorists were Saudis it looks like the wrong country was attacked after-all but hey the oil fields were secured in Iraq within the first 3 weeks and under the US control was being pumped out.

If the USA can do it, why not China or Russia, after all they are just following the lead of the US right?

Live by example I say.
 Quoting: YouAreDreaming

We gave the Afghans a chance to hand over Bin Laden and they refused. Bad move on their part.

Iraq could have been handled differently but at the end of a day going in had nothing to do with WMDs and had everything to do with sending a message to the Saudis. Read "Americas Secret War" by George Friedman for conformation of this.

The Canadians sent some troops to Iraq, too as I recall...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 43737545


The Afghan government said they would turn over bin Laden if the U.S. gave them proof that he was behind 9/11. Instead of giving some of this apprently overwhelming evidence that the U.S. collected, the U.S. government just started bombing.
YouAreDreaming  (OP)

User ID: 34048691
Canada
03/03/2014 11:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The USA vs an Asymmetrical Multi-Front War
Since 9/11, the USA has been engaged in an imperialistic takeover of the Middle-East using false-pretexts for attacking sovereign nations such as Iraq and Afghanistan.


I stopped reading right there. You're a douche and your post sucks.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 43737545


Because it's the truth, Iraq and Afghanistan had nothing to do with 9/11 what-so-ever and also had no weapons of mass destruction.

Considering all the terrorists were Saudis it looks like the wrong country was attacked after-all but hey the oil fields were secured in Iraq within the first 3 weeks and under the US control was being pumped out.

If the USA can do it, why not China or Russia, after all they are just following the lead of the US right?

Live by example I say.
 Quoting: YouAreDreaming

We gave the Afghans a chance to hand over Bin Laden and they refused. Bad move on their part.

Iraq could have been handled differently but at the end of a day going in had nothing to do with WMDs and had everything to do with sending a message to the Saudis. Read "Americas Secret War" by George Friedman for conformation of this.

The Canadians sent some troops to Iraq, too as I recall...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 43737545


The Afghan government said they would turn over bin Laden if the U.S. gave them proof that he was behind 9/11. Instead of giving some of this apprently overwhelming evidence that the U.S. collected, the U.S. government just started bombing.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15807959


Why give proof when you can give bombs as well as the gift that keeps on giving - depleted uranium?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 55106285
United States
03/03/2014 11:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The USA vs an Asymmetrical Multi-Front War
I don't get the comparison to Germany in WWI/WWII re: bullying the world.

Germany did not initiate either conflict and were in fact the chief seekers of peace.





GLP