Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,575 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,357,242
Pageviews Today: 1,828,917Threads Today: 401Posts Today: 7,076
02:18 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

How they did 911

 
abhie

User ID: 55445817
India
03/11/2014 07:53 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
How they did 911
This thread is based on the link given.
So don't shoot the messenger.
Tabling this for feedback.
Take it as your intelligence guides you too.
Inputs welcome.






Basic ingredients required for 911:

•Base of Operations; USS George Washington and/or USS John F Kennedy
•One or two white jets - SAAB 105 (for guiding in the drones)
•Two Boeing 737/767 DRONES to crash into the towers guided in by the SAAB (with 4 (?) napalm bombs attached to their bellys )
•2 US Navy helicopters (Bell 412) (South Tower/ Pentagon)(to set off pre-installed explosives via radio 1 hour after the plane crash into towers)
•2 A3 Skywarriors:
-One of which hit the Pentagon
-the other was blown up by the WHITE JET over Pennsylvania.

Napalm bombs to create the tower explosions.
•Barrels of CEROSOTE OIL to cause immense quantity of SMOKE.
•Ground based personnel , including;
-Crisis actors.
-Other actors.
-Lots more insider people.
Pre-instlled DEMOLITION RIG ,either Thermite, or Thermo-Nuclear.
•White vans and other mobile units.
-Popular Media

Method:

>White SAAB Jet guides in the Boeing 737 drone with attached napalm bombs.
>Plane crashes into building, jet veers off. Helicopter takes over control of magic show.
>Napalm bombs attached to 737's go off creating the huge >explosion.
>White SAAB or the Bell Helicopter set off the Cerosote oil tanks to generate huge amounts of smoke claiming this was jet fuel.
>Bell helicopter , after an hour or so, triggers the pre-installed demolition charges, bringing down the tower.
(other versions suggest (by Fastogie below) a thermo-nuclear explosion brought the building down, set off from WTC-7)


>Repeat cycle for the other tower.







These links in series, will guide you through:

Part 9:
[link to www.hoaxofthecentury.com]
Part 10:
[link to www.hoaxofthecentury.com]
Part 11:
[link to www.hoaxofthecentury.com]
Part 12
[link to www.hoaxofthecentury.com]
Part 46:
[link to www.hoaxofthecentury.com]
Part 47:
[link to www.hoaxofthecentury.com]
Part 48:
[link to www.hoaxofthecentury.com]



Main index:
[link to www.hoaxofthecentury.com]

Last Edited by abhie on 03/11/2014 11:30 AM
(I'm male, mid-40's, and live and work in India as a designer. Writing is a passion of mine, as is painting. My avatar represents my protagonist against the Illuminati -a female warrior.)
laotszungb
abhie (OP)

User ID: 55445817
India
03/11/2014 07:55 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
The location of the USS George Washington on 911:
[link to usatoday30.usatoday.com]
"
In addition to the aircraft carrier USS George Washington standing watch off Long Island and the carrier USS John F. Kennedy at an undisclosed location further off the East Coast, the Navy was moving several cruisers and destroyers out of port in Norfolk, Va., headquarters for the Atlantic Fleet."

Last Edited by abhie on 03/11/2014 07:56 AM
(I'm male, mid-40's, and live and work in India as a designer. Writing is a passion of mine, as is painting. My avatar represents my protagonist against the Illuminati -a female warrior.)
laotszungb
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35602178
United States
03/11/2014 08:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
too much left to chance using real aircraft of any kind. One glitch and you have tons of physical evidence lying around waiting to be analyzed.

Far tidier to let the media do the heavy lifting of telling a trusting and traumatized public what to see and interpret. Naturally this explains why you have virtually no sign of plane wreckage at any of the four impact sites.
Limpan

User ID: 1474973
Sweden
03/11/2014 08:06 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
For later

hf
Fatstogie

User ID: 54025997
United States
03/11/2014 08:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Naw.

There were no planes.

Bombs from inside the building.

Rigging the entire building, of that size, with explosives would take a fucking year or more and wouldnt go unnoticed. So nuclear is the only allowable method. Nuclear bombs were detonated 77m underground of the building.

All the plane videos are CGI. And most of them, including the 3 live shots were poorly done. The 1 camera was zoomed out and didnt show the plane, then zoomed in and now a plane is there.

Aint no aluminium plane going through steel columns. That shit woulda pancaked on the side of teh building. At the VERY least the wings and tail would NOT go into the building. They would break off on the exterior, WITHOUT QUESTION.

So yea no planes, then nuke. This is what happened.
abhie (OP)

User ID: 55445817
India
03/11/2014 08:12 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
too much left to chance using real aircraft of any kind. One glitch and you have tons of physical evidence lying around waiting to be analyzed.

Far tidier to let the media do the heavy lifting of telling a trusting and traumatized public what to see and interpret. Naturally this explains why you have virtually no sign of plane wreckage at any of the four impact sites.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35602178


Could be a possibility. In which case the question remains who brought in the napalm bombs, because in one of the pictures of the tower explosions you can see the napalm bomb coming clear through to the other side of the tower, un-exploded when the camera caught it.
You can see the napalm bomb emerging through the building in this link. Check the 11th photograph as you scroll down:
>
[link to www.hoaxofthecentury.com]
(I'm male, mid-40's, and live and work in India as a designer. Writing is a passion of mine, as is painting. My avatar represents my protagonist against the Illuminati -a female warrior.)
laotszungb
MR_BURNS

User ID: 55410632
Australia
03/11/2014 08:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
too much left to chance using real aircraft of any kind. One glitch and you have tons of physical evidence lying around waiting to be analyzed.

Far tidier to let the media do the heavy lifting of telling a trusting and traumatized public what to see and interpret. Naturally this explains why you have virtually no sign of plane wreckage at any of the four impact sites.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35602178


that whole day was a glitch for tptb

they had no clue about the future power of the interwebs
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9218421
United Kingdom
03/11/2014 08:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
A directed energy weapon took the towers down...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 47233596
United Kingdom
03/11/2014 08:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Aint no aluminium plane going through steel columns. That shit woulda pancaked on the side of teh building. At the VERY least the wings and tail would NOT go into the building. They would break off on the exterior, WITHOUT QUESTION.

 Quoting: Fatstogie


Oh yea.

abhie (OP)

User ID: 55445817
India
03/11/2014 08:15 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Naw.

There were no planes.

Bombs from inside the building.

Rigging the entire building, of that size, with explosives would take a fucking year or more and wouldnt go unnoticed. So nuclear is the only allowable method. Nuclear bombs were detonated 77m underground of the building.

All the plane videos are CGI. And most of them, including the 3 live shots were poorly done. The 1 camera was zoomed out and didnt show the plane, then zoomed in and now a plane is there.

Aint no aluminium plane going through steel columns. That shit woulda pancaked on the side of teh building. At the VERY least the wings and tail would NOT go into the building. They would break off on the exterior, WITHOUT QUESTION.

So yea no planes, then nuke. This is what happened.
 Quoting: Fatstogie


The nuclear bomb does not explain the explosions and smoke on the top of the tower. They needed somebody nearby to control and detonate them. Could they set them off via remote from a nearby building , or would they need a guy in a helicopter hovering nearby to do the job?
(I'm male, mid-40's, and live and work in India as a designer. Writing is a passion of mine, as is painting. My avatar represents my protagonist against the Illuminati -a female warrior.)
laotszungb
thetrickybigguy
say hello to my little friend...

User ID: 55457400
United States
03/11/2014 08:16 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911

Falling down is a part of life, getting back up is living. ~

Life is about choices, you get to make them each and every day of your life. ~

Capitalization is the difference between helping your Uncle Jack off a horse and helping your uncle jack off a horse.~

Only in America... do we use the word 'politics' to describe the process so well: 'Poli' in Latin meaning 'many' and 'tics' meaning 'bloodsucking creatures'.~

“When a government is dependent for money upon the bankers, they and not the government leaders control the nation. This is because the hand that gives is above the hand that takes. Financiers are without patriotism and without decency.”
abhie (OP)

User ID: 55445817
India
03/11/2014 08:17 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
A directed energy weapon took the towers down...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


Very belieivable. But ask yourself: if you were directing operations, would you actually need a hi-tech energy weapon to bring down the towers? Why wouldn't the usual demolition charges do the trick? In which the directed energy beam sci fi thing is a mis-directing hoax.
(I'm male, mid-40's, and live and work in India as a designer. Writing is a passion of mine, as is painting. My avatar represents my protagonist against the Illuminati -a female warrior.)
laotszungb
thetrickybigguy
say hello to my little friend...

User ID: 55457400
United States
03/11/2014 08:18 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911

Falling down is a part of life, getting back up is living. ~

Life is about choices, you get to make them each and every day of your life. ~

Capitalization is the difference between helping your Uncle Jack off a horse and helping your uncle jack off a horse.~

Only in America... do we use the word 'politics' to describe the process so well: 'Poli' in Latin meaning 'many' and 'tics' meaning 'bloodsucking creatures'.~

“When a government is dependent for money upon the bankers, they and not the government leaders control the nation. This is because the hand that gives is above the hand that takes. Financiers are without patriotism and without decency.”
abhie (OP)

User ID: 55445817
India
03/11/2014 08:18 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
too much left to chance using real aircraft of any kind. One glitch and you have tons of physical evidence lying around waiting to be analyzed.

Far tidier to let the media do the heavy lifting of telling a trusting and traumatized public what to see and interpret. Naturally this explains why you have virtually no sign of plane wreckage at any of the four impact sites.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35602178


that whole day was a glitch for tptb

they had no clue about the future power of the interwebs
 Quoting: MR_BURNS


Also they needed a North West wind to cover the helicopter. Sadly for them, the wind didn't follow the script.
(I'm male, mid-40's, and live and work in India as a designer. Writing is a passion of mine, as is painting. My avatar represents my protagonist against the Illuminati -a female warrior.)
laotszungb
Fatstogie

User ID: 54025997
United States
03/11/2014 08:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Naw.

There were no planes.

Bombs from inside the building.

Rigging the entire building, of that size, with explosives would take a fucking year or more and wouldnt go unnoticed. So nuclear is the only allowable method. Nuclear bombs were detonated 77m underground of the building.

All the plane videos are CGI. And most of them, including the 3 live shots were poorly done. The 1 camera was zoomed out and didnt show the plane, then zoomed in and now a plane is there.

Aint no aluminium plane going through steel columns. That shit woulda pancaked on the side of teh building. At the VERY least the wings and tail would NOT go into the building. They would break off on the exterior, WITHOUT QUESTION.

So yea no planes, then nuke. This is what happened.
 Quoting: Fatstogie


The nuclear bomb does not explain the explosions and smoke on the top of the tower. They needed somebody nearby to control and detonate them. Could they set them off via remote from a nearby building , or would they need a guy in a helicopter hovering nearby to do the job?
 Quoting: abhie


Naw all the controlling was done from WTC 7. Thats why it was blown last to cover their tracks. The tunnles going to where the nukes detonated under the towers both came from WTC 7. Thats where the control center was.

Nukes are the only way to blow those buildings that fast. When people say "oh how free fall speed?" Thats because when a nuke is detonated underground it can be directed. And will blast a "crush zone" out of the cavity if detonated at the correct depth. Literally atomizing the inside of the building. When you see it fall it looks like the top chunk is falling into dust, thats because it is dust.
Also you see the building shake 9 seconds before it falls. Thats the nuke blast.

Last Edited by Fatstogie on 03/11/2014 08:22 AM
PatrikC325

User ID: 46044698
United States
03/11/2014 08:25 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Naw.

There were no planes.

Bombs from inside the building.

Rigging the entire building, of that size, with explosives would take a fucking year or more and wouldnt go unnoticed. So nuclear is the only allowable method. Nuclear bombs were detonated 77m underground of the building.

All the plane videos are CGI. And most of them, including the 3 live shots were poorly done. The 1 camera was zoomed out and didnt show the plane, then zoomed in and now a plane is there.

Aint no aluminium plane going through steel columns. That shit woulda pancaked on the side of teh building. At the VERY least the wings and tail would NOT go into the building. They would break off on the exterior, WITHOUT QUESTION.

So yea no planes, then nuke. This is what happened.
 Quoting: Fatstogie

The building were wire with explosives between August and ended before labor day weekend. 9/11 commission has the security camera tapes of the parking garages which show 2 white vans arriving in each tower after the cleaning crews left and leaving before the first traders showed up. The tapes are sealed by court order!
abhie (OP)

User ID: 55445817
India
03/11/2014 08:25 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Naw.

There were no planes.

Bombs from inside the building.

Rigging the entire building, of that size, with explosives would take a fucking year or more and wouldnt go unnoticed. So nuclear is the only allowable method. Nuclear bombs were detonated 77m underground of the building.

All the plane videos are CGI. And most of them, including the 3 live shots were poorly done. The 1 camera was zoomed out and didnt show the plane, then zoomed in and now a plane is there.

Aint no aluminium plane going through steel columns. That shit woulda pancaked on the side of teh building. At the VERY least the wings and tail would NOT go into the building. They would break off on the exterior, WITHOUT QUESTION.

So yea no planes, then nuke. This is what happened.
 Quoting: Fatstogie


The nuclear bomb does not explain the explosions and smoke on the top of the tower. They needed somebody nearby to control and detonate them. Could they set them off via remote from a nearby building , or would they need a guy in a helicopter hovering nearby to do the job?
 Quoting: abhie


Naw all the controlling was done from WTC 7. Thats why it was blown last to cover their tracks. The tunnles going to where the nukes detonated under the towers both came from WTC 7. Thats where the control center was.

Nukes are the only way to blow those buildings that fast. When people say "oh how free fall speed?" Thats because when a nuke is detonated underground it can be directed. And will blast a "crush zone" out of the cavity if detonated at the correct depth. Literally atomizing the inside of the building. When you see it fall it looks like the top chunk is falling into dust, thats because it is dust.
Also you see the building shake 9 seconds before it falls. Thats the nuke blast.
 Quoting: Fatstogie


You may be right:
Thermo Nuclear undergrond explosion:
[link to www.nuclear-demolition.com]

(added in Thermo-nuclear bombs to my list in first post)

But they would still need the accesories; the Bell helicopters ?

Last Edited by abhie on 03/11/2014 08:37 AM
(I'm male, mid-40's, and live and work in India as a designer. Writing is a passion of mine, as is painting. My avatar represents my protagonist against the Illuminati -a female warrior.)
laotszungb
SnakeAirlines

User ID: 55252028
United States
03/11/2014 08:27 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
•Two Boeing 737 DRONES to crash into the towers guided in by the SAAB (with 4 napalm bombs attached to each 737)

They were 767's...

rolleyes

Fucking psychos can't even get the simple details correct in their delusional fantasies...

cruise
"Hold my cat while I bring in my tomato plant. That chemtrail looks like an earthquake chemtrail"

deanoZXT-07/20/2014 07:48 PM
abhie (OP)

User ID: 55445817
India
03/11/2014 08:27 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
[link to www.nuclear-demolition.com]
The picture below shows an example of that fine microscopic dust that covered all over Manhattan after the WTC demolition. Many people mistakenly believed that it was allegedly "concrete dust". No, it was not. It was "complete" dust - mainly pulverized steel. Despite common misconception, the WTC structures did not contain much concrete. Concrete was used only in some limited quantities to make very thin floors slabs in the Twin Towers construction. It was not used anywhere else. The major part of the WTC Twin Towers was steel, not concrete. So this finest dust was in its major part represented by steel dust accordingly. Though, it was not only "steel dust" alone - it was also a "furniture dust", "wood dust", "paper dust", "carpet dust", "computer parts dust" and even "human dust", since remaining in the Towers human beings were pulverized in the same manner as steel, concrete and furniture.
(I'm male, mid-40's, and live and work in India as a designer. Writing is a passion of mine, as is painting. My avatar represents my protagonist against the Illuminati -a female warrior.)
laotszungb
abhie (OP)

User ID: 55445817
India
03/11/2014 08:28 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
•Two Boeing 737 DRONES to crash into the towers guided in by the SAAB (with 4 napalm bombs attached to each 737)

They were 767's...

rolleyes

Fucking psychos can't even get the simple details correct in their delusional fantasies...

cruise
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


A Boeing 737 was used. Along with a 767.
"After guiding a Boeing 737 drone NOT the Boeing 767 Flight UA175 into and through the South Tower the helicopter waited 59 minutes before igniting the preplanted demolition charges that brought that tower to the ground AND departed for its base of operations, the aircraft carrier USS George Washington."

So why do you call it a delusion yet hasten to correct the plane type? Schizoid much?

Last Edited by abhie on 03/11/2014 08:32 AM
(I'm male, mid-40's, and live and work in India as a designer. Writing is a passion of mine, as is painting. My avatar represents my protagonist against the Illuminati -a female warrior.)
laotszungb
Fatstogie

User ID: 54025997
United States
03/11/2014 08:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Naw.

There were no planes.

Bombs from inside the building.

Rigging the entire building, of that size, with explosives would take a fucking year or more and wouldnt go unnoticed. So nuclear is the only allowable method. Nuclear bombs were detonated 77m underground of the building.

All the plane videos are CGI. And most of them, including the 3 live shots were poorly done. The 1 camera was zoomed out and didnt show the plane, then zoomed in and now a plane is there.

Aint no aluminium plane going through steel columns. That shit woulda pancaked on the side of teh building. At the VERY least the wings and tail would NOT go into the building. They would break off on the exterior, WITHOUT QUESTION.

So yea no planes, then nuke. This is what happened.
 Quoting: Fatstogie

The building were wire with explosives between August and ended before labor day weekend. 9/11 commission has the security camera tapes of the parking garages which show 2 white vans arriving in each tower after the cleaning crews left and leaving before the first traders showed up. The tapes are sealed by court order!
 Quoting: PatrikC325


Nope thats a false trail. Think about a regular building demolition. YOu hear the hundreds of explosions going off. There would be SOOOOO MANY conventional explosives needed to take down that building. HOly shit it would have to be tons and tons and tons and tons and tons of tnt. and tons and tons and tons and tons. Fuck i couldnt even guess how many. It would take a crew of hundreds of people chopping the building into pieces to rig that much demo work.

They were taken down with nukes man. If it were conventionally demo'ed youd be able to know for sure thats what happeend. All the questions people have are because they dont understand how nukes work underground. So it sounds fantastical.

So TPTB let all these other fake stories fly because theya rent the truth. People wont even believe the truth. LOL and tis funny cause theyll say "oh yea nukes... whatever" like they are some kinda nuclear physicist and know how nukes work at all. lol

Heres 2 of my fav 9/11 vids. The first dude is a lil weird but everything is pretty well explained.




Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9218421
United Kingdom
03/11/2014 08:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
A directed energy weapon took the towers down...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


Very belieivable. But ask yourself: if you were directing operations, would you actually need a hi-tech energy weapon to bring down the towers? Why wouldn't the usual demolition charges do the trick? In which the directed energy beam sci fi thing is a mis-directing hoax.
 Quoting: abhie


Not quite...

Can you explain to me why there was so much in the way of molten metal under the debris pile and it took until halfway into December 2001 to put the last fires out?

Can you explain why the signature of each of the 110+ storey towers impacting the ground had less force than the Seattle Kingdome demolition of which was 20 storeys in height?

Can you explain why some cars/fire engines etc, blocks away from the WTC site spontaneously caught fire?
abhie (OP)

User ID: 55445817
India
03/11/2014 08:40 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Naw.

There were no planes.

Bombs from inside the building.

Rigging the entire building, of that size, with explosives would take a fucking year or more and wouldnt go unnoticed. So nuclear is the only allowable method. Nuclear bombs were detonated 77m underground of the building.

All the plane videos are CGI. And most of them, including the 3 live shots were poorly done. The 1 camera was zoomed out and didnt show the plane, then zoomed in and now a plane is there.

Aint no aluminium plane going through steel columns. That shit woulda pancaked on the side of teh building. At the VERY least the wings and tail would NOT go into the building. They would break off on the exterior, WITHOUT QUESTION.

So yea no planes, then nuke. This is what happened.
 Quoting: Fatstogie

The building were wire with explosives between August and ended before labor day weekend. 9/11 commission has the security camera tapes of the parking garages which show 2 white vans arriving in each tower after the cleaning crews left and leaving before the first traders showed up. The tapes are sealed by court order!
 Quoting: PatrikC325


Nope thats a false trail. Think about a regular building demolition. YOu hear the hundreds of explosions going off. There would be SOOOOO MANY conventional explosives needed to take down that building. HOly shit it would have to be tons and tons and tons and tons and tons of tnt. and tons and tons and tons and tons. Fuck i couldnt even guess how many. It would take a crew of hundreds of people chopping the building into pieces to rig that much demo work.

They were taken down with nukes man. If it were conventionally demo'ed youd be able to know for sure thats what happeend. All the questions people have are because they dont understand how nukes work underground. So it sounds fantastical.

So TPTB let all these other fake stories fly because theya rent the truth. People wont even believe the truth. LOL and tis funny cause theyll say "oh yea nukes... whatever" like they are some kinda nuclear physicist and know how nukes work at all. lol

Heres 2 of my fav 9/11 vids. The first dude is a lil weird but everything is pretty well explained.





 Quoting: Fatstogie


Sounds good to me.
Funny how people don't think of things, owing to how little they know about the subject.Many people have never witnessed a live demolition of a major building in their lives. So its natural to think that only a few charges on each floor would be required to bring down the building. But, like you said, they would probably need tons and tons of charges. And the sound recorded from the videos would show that.
So they needed only one sound , one explosion to bring the tower down.
Yet, in some videos you can clearly both see and hear small charges going off on each floor, and the videos show the horizontal 'push' of debris. I guess these may be secondary charges along with the main thermo-nuclear charge.
(I'm male, mid-40's, and live and work in India as a designer. Writing is a passion of mine, as is painting. My avatar represents my protagonist against the Illuminati -a female warrior.)
laotszungb
abhie (OP)

User ID: 55445817
India
03/11/2014 08:42 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
A directed energy weapon took the towers down...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


Very belieivable. But ask yourself: if you were directing operations, would you actually need a hi-tech energy weapon to bring down the towers? Why wouldn't the usual demolition charges do the trick? In which the directed energy beam sci fi thing is a mis-directing hoax.
 Quoting: abhie


Not quite...

Can you explain to me why there was so much in the way of molten metal under the debris pile and it took until halfway into December 2001 to put the last fires out?

Can you explain why the signature of each of the 110+ storey towers impacting the ground had less force than the Seattle Kingdome demolition of which was 20 storeys in height?

Can you explain why some cars/fire engines etc, blocks away from the WTC site spontaneously caught fire?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


Couldn't an underground thermo-nuclear bomb do that too?
Interesting viewpoint though.
Makes one go 'hmmmmmmm....' in the night.
(I'm male, mid-40's, and live and work in India as a designer. Writing is a passion of mine, as is painting. My avatar represents my protagonist against the Illuminati -a female warrior.)
laotszungb
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9218421
United Kingdom
03/11/2014 08:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
A directed energy weapon took the towers down...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


Very belieivable. But ask yourself: if you were directing operations, would you actually need a hi-tech energy weapon to bring down the towers? Why wouldn't the usual demolition charges do the trick? In which the directed energy beam sci fi thing is a mis-directing hoax.
 Quoting: abhie


Not quite...

Can you explain to me why there was so much in the way of molten metal under the debris pile and it took until halfway into December 2001 to put the last fires out?

Can you explain why the signature of each of the 110+ storey towers impacting the ground had less force than the Seattle Kingdome demolition of which was 20 storeys in height?

Can you explain why some cars/fire engines etc, blocks away from the WTC site spontaneously caught fire?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


Couldn't an underground thermo-nuclear bomb do that too?
Interesting viewpoint though.
Makes one go 'hmmmmmmm....' in the night.
 Quoting: abhie


Wouldn't there be massive and thus obvious radiation levels in that case?

Check out the work of Dr. Judy Wood OP...
SnakeAirlines

User ID: 55252028
United States
03/11/2014 08:49 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
•Two Boeing 737 DRONES to crash into the towers guided in by the SAAB (with 4 napalm bombs attached to each 737)

They were 767's...

rolleyes

Fucking psychos can't even get the simple details correct in their delusional fantasies...

cruise
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


A Boeing 737 was used. Along with a 767.
"After guiding a Boeing 737 drone NOT the Boeing 767 Flight UA175 into and through the South Tower the helicopter waited 59 minutes before igniting the preplanted demolition charges that brought that tower to the ground AND departed for its base of operations, the aircraft carrier USS George Washington."

So why do you call it a delusion yet hasten to correct the plane type? Schizoid much?
 Quoting: abhie


Are you really this fucking stupid, or is it all part of your psychoses?

popcorn
"Hold my cat while I bring in my tomato plant. That chemtrail looks like an earthquake chemtrail"

deanoZXT-07/20/2014 07:48 PM
abhie (OP)

User ID: 55445817
India
03/11/2014 08:52 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
•Two Boeing 737 DRONES to crash into the towers guided in by the SAAB (with 4 napalm bombs attached to each 737)

They were 767's...

rolleyes

Fucking psychos can't even get the simple details correct in their delusional fantasies...

cruise
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


A Boeing 737 was used. Along with a 767.
"After guiding a Boeing 737 drone NOT the Boeing 767 Flight UA175 into and through the South Tower the helicopter waited 59 minutes before igniting the preplanted demolition charges that brought that tower to the ground AND departed for its base of operations, the aircraft carrier USS George Washington."

So why do you call it a delusion yet hasten to correct the plane type? Schizoid much?
 Quoting: abhie


Are you really this fucking stupid, or is it all part of your psychoses?

popcorn
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


You still haven't answered my question.
(I'm male, mid-40's, and live and work in India as a designer. Writing is a passion of mine, as is painting. My avatar represents my protagonist against the Illuminati -a female warrior.)
laotszungb
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 52854154
United States
03/11/2014 08:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Naw.

There were no planes.

Bombs from inside the building.

Rigging the entire building, of that size, with explosives would take a fucking year or more and wouldnt go unnoticed. So nuclear is the only allowable method. Nuclear bombs were detonated 77m underground of the building.

All the plane videos are CGI. And most of them, including the 3 live shots were poorly done. The 1 camera was zoomed out and didnt show the plane, then zoomed in and now a plane is there.

Aint no aluminium plane going through steel columns. That shit woulda pancaked on the side of teh building. At the VERY least the wings and tail would NOT go into the building. They would break off on the exterior, WITHOUT QUESTION.

So yea no planes, then nuke. This is what happened.
 Quoting: Fatstogie


You are singing my tune!!! Finally, somebody nails it with what I have been preaching all along. There was a lot of planning involved going back to the mid 90's. Most of our government was caught off guard and having to quickly react to the event. They screwed up big time and now everyone, including NIST and the 9/11 commission is part of the cover up. Mostly a cover-up of there horrible failures and wreckless decision making that day.

Start with Richard Clarke, former National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure Protection, and Counter-terrorism for the United States.

Once you know the truth, you realize that our leaders really are morons masquerading as intellectuals.

I actually feel slightly sorry for them, but wish they would all come out with the truth as this would set this country free.
abhie (OP)

User ID: 55445817
India
03/11/2014 08:54 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
...


Very belieivable. But ask yourself: if you were directing operations, would you actually need a hi-tech energy weapon to bring down the towers? Why wouldn't the usual demolition charges do the trick? In which the directed energy beam sci fi thing is a mis-directing hoax.
 Quoting: abhie


Not quite...

Can you explain to me why there was so much in the way of molten metal under the debris pile and it took until halfway into December 2001 to put the last fires out?

Can you explain why the signature of each of the 110+ storey towers impacting the ground had less force than the Seattle Kingdome demolition of which was 20 storeys in height?

Can you explain why some cars/fire engines etc, blocks away from the WTC site spontaneously caught fire?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


Couldn't an underground thermo-nuclear bomb do that too?
Interesting viewpoint though.
Makes one go 'hmmmmmmm....' in the night.
 Quoting: abhie


Wouldn't there be massive and thus obvious radiation levels in that case?

Check out the work of Dr. Judy Wood OP...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


I have read the work by Judy Wood, but some claim that she is misleading by her research. Where is the evidence of any energy weapon anywhere ? Especially satellite based. I know Tesla knew how to make one, and the Nazi's probably put one in one of their claoked UFO's they made and operate. But its still speculating as there is no proof.
(I'm male, mid-40's, and live and work in India as a designer. Writing is a passion of mine, as is painting. My avatar represents my protagonist against the Illuminati -a female warrior.)
laotszungb
SnakeAirlines

User ID: 55252028
United States
03/11/2014 09:01 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
You still haven't answered my question.
 Quoting: abhie


Was there a question in there?
"Hold my cat while I bring in my tomato plant. That chemtrail looks like an earthquake chemtrail"

deanoZXT-07/20/2014 07:48 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 52854154
United States
03/11/2014 09:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Naw.

There were no planes.

Bombs from inside the building.

Rigging the entire building, of that size, with explosives would take a fucking year or more and wouldnt go unnoticed. So nuclear is the only allowable method. Nuclear bombs were detonated 77m underground of the building.

All the plane videos are CGI. And most of them, including the 3 live shots were poorly done. The 1 camera was zoomed out and didnt show the plane, then zoomed in and now a plane is there.

Aint no aluminium plane going through steel columns. That shit woulda pancaked on the side of teh building. At the VERY least the wings and tail would NOT go into the building. They would break off on the exterior, WITHOUT QUESTION.

So yea no planes, then nuke. This is what happened.
 Quoting: Fatstogie


The nuclear bomb does not explain the explosions and smoke on the top of the tower. They needed somebody nearby to control and detonate them. Could they set them off via remote from a nearby building , or would they need a guy in a helicopter hovering nearby to do the job?
 Quoting: abhie


Naw all the controlling was done from WTC 7. Thats why it was blown last to cover their tracks. The tunnles going to where the nukes detonated under the towers both came from WTC 7. Thats where the control center was.

Nukes are the only way to blow those buildings that fast. When people say "oh how free fall speed?" Thats because when a nuke is detonated underground it can be directed. And will blast a "crush zone" out of the cavity if detonated at the correct depth. Literally atomizing the inside of the building. When you see it fall it looks like the top chunk is falling into dust, thats because it is dust.
Also you see the building shake 9 seconds before it falls. Thats the nuke blast.
 Quoting: Fatstogie


You may be right:
Thermo Nuclear undergrond explosion:
[link to www.nuclear-demolition.com]

(added in Thermo-nuclear bombs to my list in first post)

But they would still need the accesories; the Bell helicopters ?
 Quoting: abhie


Everybody that is truly looking for the right answer needs to read the above document as it will lead you down the right path once and for all. Stop all the directed energy, ET, planes, year long rigging of explosives stuff. Read this document and then research about demolition plans that were put into place for WTC's, the UN building, and Sears tower. Now you will start to figure out what happened. Open your mind and you will wake up with the truth.

It was a huge, colossal mistake. Whoops....

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!