Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,096 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 953,627
Pageviews Today: 1,275,319Threads Today: 296Posts Today: 6,044
11:38 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

How they did 911

 
abhie (OP)

User ID: 55445817
India
03/11/2014 09:05 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Everybody that is truly looking for the right answer needs to read the above document as it will lead you down the right path once and for all. Stop all the directed energy, ET, planes, year long rigging of explosives stuff. Read this document and then research about demolition plans that were put into place for WTC's, the UN building, and Sears tower. Now you will start to figure out what happened. Open your mind and you will wake up with the truth.

It was a huge, colossal mistake. Whoops....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52854154


Thanks for that post.
If you have the time, it would nice if you could make a list of all the mistakes commuted on that day. It would even spawn a thread of its own. Some people are not be able to figure out the mistakes made. Thank you.
cheers
(I'm male, mid-40's, and live and work in India as a designer. Writing is a passion of mine, as is painting. My avatar represents my protagonist against the Illuminati -a female warrior.)
laotszungb
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 55458134
United States
03/11/2014 09:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Look at me, I'm the attention whore once again. I will post bullshit after bullshit. I know it is bullshit, because I tell you I'm only the messenger, don't shoot me.

But the thing is, if you spread bullshit, knowingly, you deserve the reputation you get.
SnakeAirlines

User ID: 55252028
United States
03/11/2014 09:10 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Look at me, I'm the attention whore once again. I will post bullshit after bullshit. I know it is bullshit, because I tell you I'm only the messenger, don't shoot me.

But the thing is, if you spread bullshit, knowingly, you deserve the reputation you get.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55458134


chuckle
"Hold my cat while I bring in my tomato plant. That chemtrail looks like an earthquake chemtrail"

deanoZXT-07/20/2014 07:48 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9218421
United Kingdom
03/11/2014 09:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
...


Not quite...

Can you explain to me why there was so much in the way of molten metal under the debris pile and it took until halfway into December 2001 to put the last fires out?

Can you explain why the signature of each of the 110+ storey towers impacting the ground had less force than the Seattle Kingdome demolition of which was 20 storeys in height?

Can you explain why some cars/fire engines etc, blocks away from the WTC site spontaneously caught fire?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


Couldn't an underground thermo-nuclear bomb do that too?
Interesting viewpoint though.
Makes one go 'hmmmmmmm....' in the night.
 Quoting: abhie


Wouldn't there be massive and thus obvious radiation levels in that case?

Check out the work of Dr. Judy Wood OP...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


I have read the work by Judy Wood, but some claim that she is misleading by her research. Where is the evidence of any energy weapon anywhere ? Especially satellite based. I know Tesla knew how to make one, and the Nazi's probably put one in one of their claoked UFO's they made and operate. But its still speculating as there is no proof.
 Quoting: abhie


So by 'someone' claiming she is misleading, you take that person's word as gospel?

And what constitutes as evidence anyway? Do you really think some leaked document admitting to using DEW on 9/11 will ever surface?

By there being no empiracal evidence of DEW, does that mean they weren't used.

Look at what happened that day and look at the observations she makes. Its CLEARLY obvious there was technology at work that that we'd never saw before. A building does not simply turn to dust. Massive steel beams simply do no bend into a horseshoe shape without even a crack in it.

Oklahoma City was the first trial run of this tech. And if you think a truck bomb 'air blast' device can cut half a building in half your deluded.
abhie (OP)

User ID: 55445817
India
03/11/2014 09:11 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Look at me, I'm the attention whore once again. I will post bullshit after bullshit. I know it is bullshit, because I tell you I'm only the messenger, don't shoot me.

But the thing is, if you spread bullshit, knowingly, you deserve the reputation you get.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55458134


blahblah5

Okay, so why don't you tell us what the bullshit is?
So maybe 18 muslims with wire cutters and very less flight training DID bring down the towers? Is that what you're saying?
(I'm male, mid-40's, and live and work in India as a designer. Writing is a passion of mine, as is painting. My avatar represents my protagonist against the Illuminati -a female warrior.)
laotszungb
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22449433
Canada
03/11/2014 09:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Naw.

There were no planes.

Bombs from inside the building.

Rigging the entire building, of that size, with explosives would take a fucking year or more and wouldnt go unnoticed. So nuclear is the only allowable method. Nuclear bombs were detonated 77m underground of the building.

All the plane videos are CGI. And most of them, including the 3 live shots were poorly done. The 1 camera was zoomed out and didnt show the plane, then zoomed in and now a plane is there.

Aint no aluminium plane going through steel columns. That shit woulda pancaked on the side of teh building. At the VERY least the wings and tail would NOT go into the building. They would break off on the exterior, WITHOUT QUESTION.

So yea no planes, then nuke. This is what happened.
 Quoting: Fatstogie


I find it hard to believe what you wrote about nukes being detonated 77m underground only because the "Bathtub" retaining wall didn't sustain any major damage.

Unless these nukes your talking about were yield specific ( if there is such a thing) and used to precisely cut the anchor rigging of the buildings. Must have been some kind of explosives used though since eyewitness accounts of the lobby say it looked like a war zone as they entered to scale the building too fight the fires 7-800 feet above them.

Anyways, the devil is definitely in the details!!
abhie (OP)

User ID: 55445817
India
03/11/2014 09:13 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
...


Couldn't an underground thermo-nuclear bomb do that too?
Interesting viewpoint though.
Makes one go 'hmmmmmmm....' in the night.
 Quoting: abhie


Wouldn't there be massive and thus obvious radiation levels in that case?

Check out the work of Dr. Judy Wood OP...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


I have read the work by Judy Wood, but some claim that she is misleading by her research. Where is the evidence of any energy weapon anywhere ? Especially satellite based. I know Tesla knew how to make one, and the Nazi's probably put one in one of their claoked UFO's they made and operate. But its still speculating as there is no proof.
 Quoting: abhie


So by 'someone' claiming she is misleading, you take that person's word as gospel?

And what constitutes as evidence anyway? Do you really think some leaked document admitting to using DEW on 9/11 will ever surface?

By there being no empiracal evidence of DEW, does that mean they weren't used.

Look at what happened that day and look at the observations she makes. Its CLEARLY obvious there was technology at work that that we'd never saw before. A building does not simply turn to dust. Massive steel beams simply do no bend into a horseshoe shape without even a crack in it.

Oklahoma City was the first trial run of this tech. And if you think a truck bomb 'air blast' device can cut half a building in half your deluded.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


A huge part me believes in the work of Judy Wood. Time was when I spent days going over her site and reading all of her work. Its been ten years, and I still believe it was DEW that brought the towers down. But critics of the DEW theory abound.
(I'm male, mid-40's, and live and work in India as a designer. Writing is a passion of mine, as is painting. My avatar represents my protagonist against the Illuminati -a female warrior.)
laotszungb
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 52410732
United States
03/11/2014 09:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
...


Very belieivable. But ask yourself: if you were directing operations, would you actually need a hi-tech energy weapon to bring down the towers? Why wouldn't the usual demolition charges do the trick? In which the directed energy beam sci fi thing is a mis-directing hoax.
 Quoting: abhie


Not quite...

Can you explain to me why there was so much in the way of molten metal under the debris pile and it took until halfway into December 2001 to put the last fires out?

Can you explain why the signature of each of the 110+ storey towers impacting the ground had less force than the Seattle Kingdome demolition of which was 20 storeys in height?

Can you explain why some cars/fire engines etc, blocks away from the WTC site spontaneously caught fire?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


Couldn't an underground thermo-nuclear bomb do that too?
Interesting viewpoint though.
Makes one go 'hmmmmmmm....' in the night.
 Quoting: abhie


Wouldn't there be massive and thus obvious radiation levels in that case?

Check out the work of Dr. Judy Wood OP...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


Dont think it was a nuke due to no radiation signature. More likely a scalar weapon or something we haven't heard about yet.
abhie (OP)

User ID: 55445817
India
03/11/2014 09:15 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Naw.

There were no planes.

Bombs from inside the building.

Rigging the entire building, of that size, with explosives would take a fucking year or more and wouldnt go unnoticed. So nuclear is the only allowable method. Nuclear bombs were detonated 77m underground of the building.

All the plane videos are CGI. And most of them, including the 3 live shots were poorly done. The 1 camera was zoomed out and didnt show the plane, then zoomed in and now a plane is there.

Aint no aluminium plane going through steel columns. That shit woulda pancaked on the side of teh building. At the VERY least the wings and tail would NOT go into the building. They would break off on the exterior, WITHOUT QUESTION.

So yea no planes, then nuke. This is what happened.
 Quoting: Fatstogie


I find it hard to believe what you wrote about nukes being detonated 77m underground only because the "Bathtub" retaining wall didn't sustain any major damage.

Unless these nukes your talking about were yield specific ( if there is such a thing) and used to precisely cut the anchor rigging of the buildings. Must have been some kind of explosives used though since eyewitness accounts of the lobby say it looked like a war zone as they entered to scale the building too fight the fires 7-800 feet above them.

Anyways, the devil is definitely in the details!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22449433


One more thing that makes one go 'hmmmmmm.....' in the nite.
(I'm male, mid-40's, and live and work in India as a designer. Writing is a passion of mine, as is painting. My avatar represents my protagonist against the Illuminati -a female warrior.)
laotszungb
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 55386341
United Kingdom
03/11/2014 09:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Jeezus - it was 19 Arab muslims with box cutters!


They had the KGB instigate oversee and manage it as revenge for Afghanistan.

The Inner circle of the CIA ran interference for it.

'They' being the illuminists who used it as a Satanic ritual to initiate the collapse of America.


You don't plan an OP like this, without keeping it simple foolproof and deniable - you do create a whirlwind of bullshit misdirection and disinformation to keep the conspiracy flakes busy!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 39884687
United States
03/11/2014 09:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Aint no aluminium plane going through steel columns. That shit woulda pancaked on the side of teh building. At the VERY least the wings and tail would NOT go into the building. They would break off on the exterior, WITHOUT QUESTION.

 Quoting: Fatstogie


Oh yea.


 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 47233596


ouch
MR_BURNS

User ID: 55410632
Australia
03/11/2014 09:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
tool box size explosive every second floor put there during elevator renovation no wiring needed
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 8005383
United States
03/11/2014 09:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
•Two Boeing 737 DRONES to crash into the towers guided in by the SAAB (with 4 napalm bombs attached to each 737)

They were 767's...

rolleyes

Fucking psychos can't even get the simple details correct in their delusional fantasies...

cruise
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


A Boeing 737 was used. Along with a 767.
"After guiding a Boeing 737 drone NOT the Boeing 767 Flight UA175 into and through the South Tower the helicopter waited 59 minutes before igniting the preplanted demolition charges that brought that tower to the ground AND departed for its base of operations, the aircraft carrier USS George Washington."

So why do you call it a delusion yet hasten to correct the plane type? Schizoid much?
 Quoting: abhie


Are you really this fucking stupid, or is it all part of your psychoses?

popcorn
 Quoting: SnakeAirlines


One of the biggest trolls of the forum. How pathetic is it that the only way you can achieve "good karma" is by reporting abusive posts when almost every post by you is negative and condescending. Seriously, who visits a forum as often as you do just to tell random people how stupid they are? Obviously some pretty happy ones, right?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 52854154
United States
03/11/2014 09:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
...


Not quite...

Can you explain to me why there was so much in the way of molten metal under the debris pile and it took until halfway into December 2001 to put the last fires out?

Can you explain why the signature of each of the 110+ storey towers impacting the ground had less force than the Seattle Kingdome demolition of which was 20 storeys in height?

Can you explain why some cars/fire engines etc, blocks away from the WTC site spontaneously caught fire?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


Couldn't an underground thermo-nuclear bomb do that too?
Interesting viewpoint though.
Makes one go 'hmmmmmmm....' in the night.
 Quoting: abhie


Wouldn't there be massive and thus obvious radiation levels in that case?

Check out the work of Dr. Judy Wood OP...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


Dont think it was a nuke due to no radiation signature. More likely a scalar weapon or something we haven't heard about yet.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52410732


Try to take a Geiger counter anywhere near "Ground Zero". Good luck and I look forward to seeing your mugshot. Try the radiation signature of all of the first responder deaths related to radiation poisoning. Is that a good enough signature for you?

BTW....what does Ground Zero mean....let me look that up in my 1990's dictionary. Oh...there it is...the site of a nuclear detonation.
Nikola Tesla

User ID: 17189250
United States
03/11/2014 09:36 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
The location of the USS George Washington on 911:
[link to usatoday30.usatoday.com]
"
In addition to the aircraft carrier USS George Washington standing watch off Long Island and the carrier USS John F. Kennedy at an undisclosed location further off the East Coast, the Navy was moving several cruisers and destroyers out of port in Norfolk, Va., headquarters for the Atlantic Fleet."
 Quoting: abhie


OK, interesting theory. Can you tell me what happened to all of the people who disappeared that day?

The people who were purportedly aboard the supposed planes?

This is interesting.
“Life's hard. It's even harder when you're stupid.” John Wayne
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~​~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The opinions expressed by this author do not necessarily represent those of GLP management, its sponsors or any other historical figures with the same or similar name.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~​~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We only give green (good) karma unless you are really naughty. When we do give karma, we always sign our name.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 52854154
United States
03/11/2014 09:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Naw.

There were no planes.

Bombs from inside the building.

Rigging the entire building, of that size, with explosives would take a fucking year or more and wouldnt go unnoticed. So nuclear is the only allowable method. Nuclear bombs were detonated 77m underground of the building.

All the plane videos are CGI. And most of them, including the 3 live shots were poorly done. The 1 camera was zoomed out and didnt show the plane, then zoomed in and now a plane is there.

Aint no aluminium plane going through steel columns. That shit woulda pancaked on the side of teh building. At the VERY least the wings and tail would NOT go into the building. They would break off on the exterior, WITHOUT QUESTION.

So yea no planes, then nuke. This is what happened.
 Quoting: Fatstogie


I find it hard to believe what you wrote about nukes being detonated 77m underground only because the "Bathtub" retaining wall didn't sustain any major damage.

Unless these nukes your talking about were yield specific ( if there is such a thing) and used to precisely cut the anchor rigging of the buildings. Must have been some kind of explosives used though since eyewitness accounts of the lobby say it looked like a war zone as they entered to scale the building too fight the fires 7-800 feet above them.

Anyways, the devil is definitely in the details!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22449433


One more thing that makes one go 'hmmmmmm.....' in the nite.
 Quoting: abhie


Go research and find the photo of the molten rock beneath the WTC's that Silverstein Properties took. No one was allowed to have any photography of this site, but Larry thumbed his nose at the government and took one anyways. You don't get molten rock from jet fuel folks.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9218421
United Kingdom
03/11/2014 09:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
...


Couldn't an underground thermo-nuclear bomb do that too?
Interesting viewpoint though.
Makes one go 'hmmmmmmm....' in the night.
 Quoting: abhie


Wouldn't there be massive and thus obvious radiation levels in that case?

Check out the work of Dr. Judy Wood OP...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


Dont think it was a nuke due to no radiation signature. More likely a scalar weapon or something we haven't heard about yet.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52410732


Try to take a Geiger counter anywhere near "Ground Zero". Good luck and I look forward to seeing your mugshot. Try the radiation signature of all of the first responder deaths related to radiation poisoning. Is that a good enough signature for you?

BTW....what does Ground Zero mean....let me look that up in my 1990's dictionary. Oh...there it is...the site of a nuclear detonation.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52854154


Asbestos buddy, ever heard of it?

putin
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 52854154
United States
03/11/2014 09:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
The location of the USS George Washington on 911:
[link to usatoday30.usatoday.com]
"
In addition to the aircraft carrier USS George Washington standing watch off Long Island and the carrier USS John F. Kennedy at an undisclosed location further off the East Coast, the Navy was moving several cruisers and destroyers out of port in Norfolk, Va., headquarters for the Atlantic Fleet."
 Quoting: abhie


OK, interesting theory. Can you tell me what happened to all of the people who disappeared that day?

The people who were purportedly aboard the supposed planes?

This is interesting.
 Quoting: Nikola Tesla


Flights were either destroyed over Atlantic or landed in Cleveland and passengers disappeared.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 52854154
United States
03/11/2014 09:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
...


Wouldn't there be massive and thus obvious radiation levels in that case?

Check out the work of Dr. Judy Wood OP...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


Dont think it was a nuke due to no radiation signature. More likely a scalar weapon or something we haven't heard about yet.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52410732


Try to take a Geiger counter anywhere near "Ground Zero". Good luck and I look forward to seeing your mugshot. Try the radiation signature of all of the first responder deaths related to radiation poisoning. Is that a good enough signature for you?

BTW....what does Ground Zero mean....let me look that up in my 1990's dictionary. Oh...there it is...the site of a nuclear detonation.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52854154


Asbestos buddy, ever heard of it?

putin
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


Yes I have, buddy, and I am also smart enough to research the type of cancers suffered by these heroes and find that most of the cancers suffered are not from asbestos.

Asbestos causes mainly lung disease known as mesothelioma, not what a majority of the cancer cases of first responders are experiencing.

Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer: 156 cases
Melanoma of the Skin: 117 cases
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: 112 cases
Thyroid: 97 cases
Leukemia: 76
Lung: 72
Kidney: 68
Bladder: 62
Colon: 61
Breast: 55
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9218421
United Kingdom
03/11/2014 09:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Yeh, Asbestos mixed with countless other contaminants from the construction materials and contents of the entire buildings...

First and foremost, I cant see a nuclear type device being used as the radiation levels would be picked up from around the whole country in a matter of days, just like Chernobyl. It would be far too obvious if there was...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 52854154
United States
03/11/2014 09:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Yeh, Asbestos mixed with countless other contaminants from the construction materials and contents of the entire buildings...

First and foremost, I cant see a nuclear type device being used as the radiation levels would be picked up from around the whole country in a matter of days, just like Chernobyl. It would be far too obvious if there was...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


Not as much with an underground explosion. There were some tremors detected at time of explosions.

And who controls the radiation monitoring???

Funny you should bring up Chernobyl....this has some indirect ties to 911.
MR_BURNS

User ID: 55410632
Australia
03/11/2014 09:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
there was no nuke there was no need for a nuke
just a lot of carefully placed big tool box size explosives
watch your vids again watch every second floor

just watch
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 44695641
United States
03/11/2014 09:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
A friend in NYC lived two blocks from the WTC back then. When his building was evacuated, while I was on the phone with him from LA, they stood around for a while watching the smoke...and when the buildings came down, he said it was the most horrendous sound he'd ever heard..."like a long zipper coming undone".

That, to me, sounds like a string of timed explosives already rigged in the towers going off at intervals. My friend is a well-known sound engineer in the city.

When I visited him a few weeks earlier, he was shocked at the lines to get up to the Top of the World...worst he'd EVER seen on a Monday in fifteen years of living there. We waited anyways, I insisted since I didn't know when I was going to get back.

We later learned the lines were because of odd security shutdowns of the elevators. There were also very strange power shutdowns during that time.

When he made it to New Jersey a few hours later, on one of the private boats doing shuttle service off the island, he was shocked to see that FEMA was already setup there. They had gotten there the day earlier.


Cheers,
John
Detroit
MR_BURNS

User ID: 55410632
Australia
03/11/2014 10:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Yeh, Asbestos mixed with countless other contaminants from the construction materials and contents of the entire buildings...

First and foremost, I cant see a nuclear type device being used as the radiation levels would be picked up from around the whole country in a matter of days, just like Chernobyl. It would be far too obvious if there was...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


Not as much with an underground explosion. There were some tremors detected at time of explosions.

And who controls the radiation monitoring???

Funny you should bring up Chernobyl....this has some indirect ties to 911.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52854154


there is no radioactive material in the tiny molten spheres
Shrapneloc

User ID: 42552636
United States
03/11/2014 10:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Fallen Angels in form of plains and nuclear termite inside.


You can see the demo ic orbs enter and exit the other side of BOTH buildings. That's why you see a demon manifest in the smoke as well.
Shrapneloc
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 9218421
United Kingdom
03/11/2014 10:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Yeh, Asbestos mixed with countless other contaminants from the construction materials and contents of the entire buildings...

First and foremost, I cant see a nuclear type device being used as the radiation levels would be picked up from around the whole country in a matter of days, just like Chernobyl. It would be far too obvious if there was...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9218421


Not as much with an underground explosion. There were some tremors detected at time of explosions.

And who controls the radiation monitoring???

Funny you should bring up Chernobyl....this has some indirect ties to 911.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 52854154


I was thinking more along the lines of independant/amateur monitoring stations picking up increased levels?

Whats the story with Chernobyl and 9/11?
MR_BURNS

User ID: 55410632
Australia
03/11/2014 10:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
don't just watch one doc and think that's it watch everything and then forget everything you know about it and then watch again
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1062660
United States
03/11/2014 10:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
Naw.

There were no planes.

Bombs from inside the building.

Rigging the entire building, of that size, with explosives would take a fucking year or more and wouldnt go unnoticed. So nuclear is the only allowable method. Nuclear bombs were detonated 77m underground of the building.

All the plane videos are CGI. And most of them, including the 3 live shots were poorly done. The 1 camera was zoomed out and didnt show the plane, then zoomed in and now a plane is there.

Aint no aluminium plane going through steel columns. That shit woulda pancaked on the side of teh building. At the VERY least the wings and tail would NOT go into the building. They would break off on the exterior, WITHOUT QUESTION.

So yea no planes, then nuke. This is what happened.
 Quoting: Fatstogie


Agree with everything, but no question the whole building was rigged. No other way to explain the systematic collapse. Nuke in the sublevels only way to explain huge pools of molten steel on the bedrock.
Shrapneloc

User ID: 42552636
United States
03/11/2014 10:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
FALLEN ANGELS MORPHED INTO PLAINS, NUCLEAR TERMITE INSIDE.

WATCH

[link to www.youtube.com]

Last Edited by Shrapneloc on 03/11/2014 10:14 AM
Shrapneloc
eye witness
User ID: 9557527
United States
03/11/2014 10:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: How they did 911
sorry to burst your bubbles, but I saw those planes hit the towers with my own eyes, i saw the tower fall with my own eyes,

for years, all we heard was how stupid and amateurish the bush II administration was.(as compared to president obama's lol) So you really think that they were capable of pulling off all of this, with all these people in the know, and all these plots having to be pre planned, pre rigged and in place, along with the planes,the helicopters, the ships and all the people who are involved with them, and not one person, has let it slip, not one has a shred of real evidence that any of what you say transpired has occured, not one person has an email, a text msg. an order, anything that would lend credence to this farce.

IT WAS A TERRORIST ACT. THEY USED PLANES FULL OF PEOPLE, AND THE RESULTANT COLLASPE AND FAILURE OF THE TWIN TOWERS WAS A DIRECT RESULT OF THOSE PLANES CRASHING INTO THEM.

I love a good conspiracy theory,but this isnt even worth the time it takes to read. NEXT?

News