Lloyd Pye's last interview on Ancient Aliens | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55911390 United States 03/22/2014 03:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 34290394 Puerto Rico 03/22/2014 03:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32069520 United States 03/22/2014 03:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17487177 United States 03/22/2014 03:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Citizenperth User ID: 55351057 Australia 03/22/2014 03:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Until an actual *real* science organization gets to study and test the skull, I'm not buying any of it. If it were that extraordinary, nothing would stop it from being world news. Quoting: Paige It's just another hoax. Just a deformed human skull. If she has bothered to read anything, she'd learn that the skull has been looked at extensively by experts with medical degrees. Well then it's settled! The Star Child Project (LOL) has the only confirmed proof of an alien being, and it's just been really tough for the rest of the world to pick up on this earth-shattering finding. [link to en.wikipedia.org] The Starchild skull is an abnormal human skull allegedly found in Mexico that is claimed to be the product of extraterrestrial-human breeding or genetic manipulation. Tests conducted utilizing mtDNA recovered from the skull have established it as human.[1][2] Experts believe it to be the skull of a child who died as a result of known genetic or congenital abnormalities, such as congenital hydrocephalus. Neurologist Steven Novella of Yale University Medical School says that the cranium exhibits all of the characteristics of a child who has died as a result of congenital hydrocephalus, and the cranial deformations were the result of accumulations of cerebrospinal fluid within the skull paige, your hormones are working..... It's life as we know it, but only just. [link to citizenperth.wordpress.com] sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie |
ZoutStraal User ID: 4943769 Netherlands 03/22/2014 03:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Until an actual *real* science organization gets to study and test the skull, I'm not buying any of it. If it were that extraordinary, nothing would stop it from being world news. Quoting: Paige It's just another hoax. Just a deformed human skull. If she has bothered to read anything, she'd learn that the skull has been looked at extensively by experts with medical degrees. I agree, to many people want to see it on the MSM but that's not going to happen. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 42679457 United States 03/22/2014 03:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Genesis 6:4 (Original KJV): Quoting: Goofy for God There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. Where does it talk about "aliens"? . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17487177 United States 03/22/2014 03:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32069520 United States 03/22/2014 03:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Until an actual *real* science organization gets to study and test the skull, I'm not buying any of it. If it were that extraordinary, nothing would stop it from being world news. Quoting: Paige It's just another hoax. Just a deformed human skull. If she has bothered to read anything, she'd learn that the skull has been looked at extensively by experts with medical degrees. Well then it's settled! The Star Child Project (LOL) has the only confirmed proof of an alien being, and it's just been really tough for the rest of the world to pick up on this earth-shattering finding. [link to en.wikipedia.org] The Starchild skull is an abnormal human skull allegedly found in Mexico that is claimed to be the product of extraterrestrial-human breeding or genetic manipulation. Tests conducted utilizing mtDNA recovered from the skull have established it as human.[1][2] Experts believe it to be the skull of a child who died as a result of known genetic or congenital abnormalities, such as congenital hydrocephalus. Neurologist Steven Novella of Yale University Medical School says that the cranium exhibits all of the characteristics of a child who has died as a result of congenital hydrocephalus, and the cranial deformations were the result of accumulations of cerebrospinal fluid within the skull Wiki is not credible at all... Nothing but lies. [link to www.starchildskull.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32069520 United States 03/22/2014 03:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32069520 United States 03/22/2014 03:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah, bunch of lies. Quoting: Paige [link to en.wikipedia.org] DNA testing DNA testing in 1999 at BOLD (Bureau of Legal Dentistry), a forensic DNA lab in Vancouver, British Columbia found standard X and Y chromosomes in two samples taken from the skull, "conclusive evidence that the child was not only human (and male), but both of his parents must have been human as well, for each must have contributed one of the human sex chromosomes."[2] Further DNA testing in 2003 at Trace Genetics, which specializes in extracting DNA from ancient samples, isolated mitochondrial DNA from both recovered skulls. The child belongs to haplogroup C. Since mitochondrial DNA is inherited exclusively from the mother, it makes it possible to trace the offspring's maternal lineage. The DNA test therefore confirmed that the child's mother was a Haplogroup C human female. However, the adult female found with the child belonged to haplogroup A. Both haplotypes are characteristic Native American haplogroups, but the different haplogroup for each skull indicates that the adult female was not the child's mother.[1] Again, outdated. [link to www.starchildproject.com] Much more up to date. Only idiots would use wiki as a source. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17487177 United States 03/22/2014 03:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32069520 United States 03/22/2014 03:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.lloydpye.com] FIGHT THE STUPIDS! FRAUD REVEALED IN WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE ABOUT LLOYD PYE Introduction Wikipedia is organized and run like an asylum where the inmates are in charge, so to highlight its silliness I refer to it as Wackypedia. The Wacky inmates have overseen the creation of numerous high-profile errors, including false reports of the deaths of the comedian Sinbad (and the Sailor, too, for all I know) , Miley Cyrus, and Sen. Ted Kenedy, among many others, not to mention high-profile trashing of various other celebrities by people with axes to grind against them. Because Wackypedia entries can be written by anyone, it is the responsibility of Wacky editors and administrators to make certain that everyone plays fair in the sandbox. But what if one of the editors or admins turns out to be the bully in the box? That, in fact, is what happens all too often because of the enormous size of "the people's encyclopedia." Those who rise to positions of influence tend to be passionate extremists of every political, philosophical, and scientific stripe, and those extremists rule their portion of the Wacky empire with feudal autocracy. One Wacky administrator can completely control the text on any page. Let's say, for example, that a particularly insecure and self-righteous admin thinks Lloyd Pye and the Starchild Skull are detriments to society. Let's say the admin decides to create pages for both that are filled with inaccuracy and innuendo that makes them both seem like frauds and charlatans. Now, let's further assume that this particular admin links those two pages to his personal computer, so that when anyone attempts to change anything on either page, that admin will be notified by a message and with the stroke of a computer key the altered page will go right back to the way it suits the admin's bias. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32069520 United States 03/22/2014 03:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32069520 United States 03/22/2014 03:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yeah, bunch of lies. Quoting: Paige [link to en.wikipedia.org] DNA testing DNA testing in 1999 at BOLD (Bureau of Legal Dentistry), a forensic DNA lab in Vancouver, British Columbia found standard X and Y chromosomes in two samples taken from the skull, "conclusive evidence that the child was not only human (and male), but both of his parents must have been human as well, for each must have contributed one of the human sex chromosomes."[2] Further DNA testing in 2003 at Trace Genetics, which specializes in extracting DNA from ancient samples, isolated mitochondrial DNA from both recovered skulls. The child belongs to haplogroup C. Since mitochondrial DNA is inherited exclusively from the mother, it makes it possible to trace the offspring's maternal lineage. The DNA test therefore confirmed that the child's mother was a Haplogroup C human female. However, the adult female found with the child belonged to haplogroup A. Both haplotypes are characteristic Native American haplogroups, but the different haplogroup for each skull indicates that the adult female was not the child's mother.[1] Again, outdated. [link to www.starchildproject.com] Much more up to date. Only idiots would use wiki as a source. Yeah, stupid wiki siting actual facts about the human skull. Much more reasonable to believe whatever The Star Child Foundation says about it. LOL. You guys will believe anything anyone says, as long as it's got to do with aliens or bigfoot. Then why are you on GLP? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17487177 United States 03/22/2014 03:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32069520 United States 03/22/2014 03:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.lloydpye.com] THE "NOVELLA" APPROACH In 1999, Steven Novella wrote a highly critical article about the Starchild Skull and about Lloyd Pye for the New England Skeptical Society. Much of the information in that article was character assassination based on a clear dislike of Lloyd Pye and his work. The part of the article that related to the Starchild Skull was based on less than one year's research, when relatively little of lasting value was known about the skull. LEARN MORE > In 2006, Lloyd contacted Novella to ask that his badly flawed article be revised to include results of the latest research, which contradicted nearly all of the article's main attack points. The emailed response was: The article stands as written. However, to add insult to injury, Novella changed the copyright on his article from 1999 to 2006, making the trashing he wrote seem current. LEARN MORE > This profoundly inaccurate article remains the primary reference of mainstream scientists and their defenders when they attack the Starchild Skull, and it is the basis of Wackypedia'sequally flawed articles about Lloyd and the Starchild. LEARN MORE > |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32069520 United States 03/22/2014 03:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: AlcoholicAlien Again, outdated. [link to www.starchildproject.com] Much more up to date. Only idiots would use wiki as a source. Yeah, stupid wiki siting actual facts about the human skull. Much more reasonable to believe whatever The Star Child Foundation says about it. LOL. You guys will believe anything anyone says, as long as it's got to do with aliens or bigfoot. Then why are you on GLP? I am an actual alien. I get offended when deformed human skulls are paraded about and attributed to my kind. :wat33::BBshaking33::alaien33: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17487177 United States 03/22/2014 03:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.lloydpye.com] Quoting: AlcoholicAlien THE "NOVELLA" APPROACH In 1999, Steven Novella wrote a highly critical article about the Starchild Skull and about Lloyd Pye for the New England Skeptical Society. Much of the information in that article was character assassination based on a clear dislike of Lloyd Pye and his work. The part of the article that related to the Starchild Skull was based on less than one year's research, when relatively little of lasting value was known about the skull. LEARN MORE > In 2006, Lloyd contacted Novella to ask that his badly flawed article be revised to include results of the latest research, which contradicted nearly all of the article's main attack points. The emailed response was: The article stands as written. However, to add insult to injury, Novella changed the copyright on his article from 1999 to 2006, making the trashing he wrote seem current. LEARN MORE > This profoundly inaccurate article remains the primary reference of mainstream scientists and their defenders when they attack the Starchild Skull, and it is the basis of Wackypedia'sequally flawed articles about Lloyd and the Starchild. LEARN MORE > You quote the only source you choose to believe. Narrow mind, much ? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32069520 United States 03/22/2014 04:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.lloydpye.com] Quoting: AlcoholicAlien THE "NOVELLA" APPROACH In 1999, Steven Novella wrote a highly critical article about the Starchild Skull and about Lloyd Pye for the New England Skeptical Society. Much of the information in that article was character assassination based on a clear dislike of Lloyd Pye and his work. The part of the article that related to the Starchild Skull was based on less than one year's research, when relatively little of lasting value was known about the skull. LEARN MORE > In 2006, Lloyd contacted Novella to ask that his badly flawed article be revised to include results of the latest research, which contradicted nearly all of the article's main attack points. The emailed response was: The article stands as written. However, to add insult to injury, Novella changed the copyright on his article from 1999 to 2006, making the trashing he wrote seem current. LEARN MORE > This profoundly inaccurate article remains the primary reference of mainstream scientists and their defenders when they attack the Starchild Skull, and it is the basis of Wackypedia'sequally flawed articles about Lloyd and the Starchild. LEARN MORE > You quote the only source you choose to believe. Narrow mind, much ? :retard: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17487177 United States 03/22/2014 04:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.lloydpye.com] Quoting: AlcoholicAlien THE "NOVELLA" APPROACH In 1999, Steven Novella wrote a highly critical article about the Starchild Skull and about Lloyd Pye for the New England Skeptical Society. Much of the information in that article was character assassination based on a clear dislike of Lloyd Pye and his work. The part of the article that related to the Starchild Skull was based on less than one year's research, when relatively little of lasting value was known about the skull. LEARN MORE > In 2006, Lloyd contacted Novella to ask that his badly flawed article be revised to include results of the latest research, which contradicted nearly all of the article's main attack points. The emailed response was: The article stands as written. However, to add insult to injury, Novella changed the copyright on his article from 1999 to 2006, making the trashing he wrote seem current. LEARN MORE > This profoundly inaccurate article remains the primary reference of mainstream scientists and their defenders when they attack the Starchild Skull, and it is the basis of Wackypedia'sequally flawed articles about Lloyd and the Starchild. LEARN MORE > You quote the only source you choose to believe. Narrow mind, much ? :retard: Deflection. Nice. Care to provide proof, other than that site ? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 722650 United States 03/22/2014 05:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Is it just me or does it seem strange that the whole time they've had this 'starchild' skull that nobody's ever come up with a few dollars to have the dna testing done? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1011733 It required thousands of dollars. Lloyd filed bankruptcy after putting everything he had into the project. It's not a cheap process. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55966215 United States 03/22/2014 05:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Weymouth New Testament Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55952396 She finds no pleasure in injustice done to others, but joyfully sides with the truth. Shouldn't you be out door-to-door witnessing. Find it odd that jw's have so much time for a conspiracy site. Definitely not jw. Just love God with all my heart and soul, and my neighbor as myself (well, I try). |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55966215 United States 03/22/2014 05:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: BRIEF Who knows how many species and inhabited planets God made...not even ET knows that. Through the channelings (they call it telepathic communication) they call him Prime Creator. They have high respect for "him". Unlike the Satanists that run this fucking pathetic bloody greedy shallow show here on Earth. Channeling might work sort of, once in a while like hitting the lottery. I think most of it is just delusional peeps. I have a relative like that. Most probably contact cast down forth dimension deceptive creatures. I don't know. They said we would be getting super-powers after December 21st 2012 and I got mine before that, which was aerokinesis (making clouds disappear with my thoughts) and then heliokinesis (making the Sun emanate violet rays). Around that time they showed up for me as a form of an orb on the sky. I was crying. They seemed to know my mood. Then, next year, on the same FIRST SUNDAY AFTER CARNIVAL they showed up on the window of my house. I took pictures. They seemed to know where I lived! They also seemed loving and kind! JUST AS THE CHANNELINGS DESCRIBE THEM AS BEING. I remember you. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45494076 United States 03/22/2014 05:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: AlcoholicAlien Again, outdated. [link to www.starchildproject.com] Much more up to date. Only idiots would use wiki as a source. Yeah, stupid wiki siting actual facts about the human skull. Much more reasonable to believe whatever The Star Child Foundation says about it. LOL. You guys will believe anything anyone says, as long as it's got to do with aliens or bigfoot. Then why are you on GLP? I am an actual alien. I get offended when deformed human skulls are paraded about and attributed to my kind. Actually :youreafag: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45494076 United States 03/22/2014 05:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Paige Yeah, stupid wiki siting actual facts about the human skull. Much more reasonable to believe whatever The Star Child Foundation says about it. LOL. You guys will believe anything anyone says, as long as it's got to do with aliens or bigfoot. Then why are you on GLP? I am an actual alien. I get offended when deformed human skulls are paraded about and attributed to my kind. Actually :youreafag: I'm sorry, maybe you are an alien. That's why you enjoy anal probing so much. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55966215 United States 03/22/2014 06:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ahh..... your "alien" giving us the finger is interesting. Despite "billions of years of evolution", the "aliens are still prone to respond emotionally to things that they don't like. So much for the nonsensical theory that "aliens" are something other than FALLEN ANGELS from the Bible. You have been very helpful. . Whomever they are, they were created by God, and we must pray for them. Be sure and add, to your prayers, "according to God's will alone." Thanks! I doubt few will understand you. What I'm saying is extremely simple, logical, and loving. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55966215 United States 03/22/2014 06:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | A star child for sure, if thats what ya call it. They have been here from the beginning duping men into thinking they are from other galaxies. God himself confirmed they would be doing the same thing they were doing before the flood and after. Mixing with the women of men genetically. Noahs genealogy was the only one that wasnt corrupted. BUt in this end it will be worse and done openly eventually what they have been doing in the underground bases under the cover of secrecy. Some are willing to sell their soul for knowledge, and technology..to be converted to power and control. As evidenced in our current leadership around the world. IMO Great thread brief, strange times indeed! Yes, VERY strange times when there's a thread with Brief in it that I don't leave rather quickly. I hope he keeps up this more interesting, educated, CIVIL persona! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55966215 United States 03/22/2014 06:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 26059931 Ahh..... your "alien" giving us the finger is interesting. Despite "billions of years of evolution", the "aliens are still prone to respond emotionally to things that they don't like. So much for the nonsensical theory that "aliens" are something other than FALLEN ANGELS from the Bible. You have been very helpful. . Whomever they are, they were created by God, and we must pray for them. Be sure and add, to your prayers, "according to God's will alone." Thanks! I doubt few will understand you. Are you saying that people are supposed to pray for FALLEN ANGELS? If so, where does the Bible say that? Aside from the fact that they are coporeal beings (have sex, produce children, etc.), God said in the Bible that He wills that NONE should perish but ALL have everlasting life. You can't cherry-pick the Bible, dude. I think someone already pointed that out. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 55966215 United States 03/22/2014 06:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Pye was not only just plain wrong but was knowingly deceptive as well . Just like Sitchin. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4327850 Have a look at Roona Begum. [link to www.mirror.co.uk] Examination of Pye's work. [link to www.badarchaeology.com] And this.... [link to ancientaliensdebunked.com] You really can't debunk the pyramids and other amazing monuments that WE could not build today. You can't get around it, no matter how hard you try. You have to go from truth. It's difficult to let go of old concepts, but, remember, the truth will set you free! God Himself is omniscient, omnipresent, and omnipotent. He is different from Yahweh, who just pretended to be God, and did a very poor job. |