Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,568 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,354,853
Pageviews Today: 1,846,105Threads Today: 331Posts Today: 7,070
02:01 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

A PLEA FOR NET NEUTRALITY by Charles Sullivan: The greatest danger is that the Internet would no longer be free. (MORE INFO ADDED)

 
BUSH MUST GO
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 105879
United States
06/19/2006 04:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
A PLEA FOR NET NEUTRALITY by Charles Sullivan: The greatest danger is that the Internet would no longer be free. (MORE INFO ADDED)
"If net neutrality is defeated the result will be a familiar one that characterizes all capitalist societies divided by class. Once again, it will be those with money who get preferential treatment. It will be much like our American coin operated congress in which capital is equated to free speech. Those with money will have access, those without will not."


[link to www.informationclearinghouse.info]


A Plea for Net Neutrality


By Charles Sullivan


06/18/06 "Information Clearing House" - [link to www.informationclearinghouse.info] - The early days of radio and television promised to bring enlightenment to the world. The public air waves, we were told, would be used for the public good; as a tool for education and for the spread of democracy. That has simply not been the case. The public airwaves, like all things public, were usurped by profit seeking capitalists to promote commercialism, propaganda, and the privatization of profits. It was another example of socialized cost and privatized profits that are a characteristic of capitalism. Not only were the public airwaves used as an instrument to exploit and to control the masses, they were used to dumb down America. Entertainment and consumerism quickly supplanted education and every other form of social uplift that should have permeated the air waves.

It is important to understand that capitalism rarely works in the public interest. Profit motive is the driving force. Any public good that stems from it is purely accidental.

The corporate media that was long ago used as a weapon against the people is still used to promulgate the lies and distortions that have torn this nation asunder and set the world ablaze with war and discord. The shameless promotion of the war in Iraq and the brutal occupation of the Palestinian people by the Israeli military are poignant examples. The commercial media is used against us like a weapon to promote the most barbaric human behavior and they are allowed to call it liberation, democracy, and Christianity. Invading and occupying armies are called liberators, while those defending their homes are labeled insurgents and terrorists.

Beyond their use to promote war, both at home and abroad, the public air waves are also used to endorse consumption on a grand scale that is detrimental to the health of the planet, so that a few get rich by exploiting the many.

So infected are the public airwaves with the lies and distortions of capitalism and the military industrial complex, that there is no room for the expression of opposing opinions or dissent. The perspectives presented are so homogenized and conformist as to be nearly indistinguishable from one another. This mush is spoon fed into the malleable minds of the restless consumer, if I may borrow a phrase from Neal Young, resulting in a bloated corpse of humanity that is essentially brain dead and unable to act in its own defense.

Enter the Internet, one of the last bastions for democracy and the free and open exchange of ideas. The Internet provides a place where people around the world can gather, share ideas, enjoy a laugh, and seek truth. It is not perfect but it is a resource that is pregnant with possibilities. It is one of the last places where one can readily read dissenting points of view that are no longer possible in the mainstream of corporate reportage and synthesized news. Thank goodness we can still gather at web sites like this and create a vision for a just and peaceful future, as an alternative to war that will not end in our lifetimes.

If the world’s largest telecommunications companies have their way that will change. Currently, the complex series of ones and zeroes that move at high speed through millions of miles of cables and airwaves are treated equally—a byte is a byte is a byte, whether yours, mine or Bill Gates’. The concept of net neutrality stems from this principle. Telecommunications giants such as AT&T, Verizon and Comcast want to change that by creating a two-tiered superhighway—a technological toll road, if you will. Users who pay additional fees, primarily corporate clients promoting capitalism, would have unfettered access to the fast lanes. The rest of us would, rather than being treated as equals, become second class citizens stuck in the slowest lanes with the poorest service. In the worst case scenario service could be denied altogether.

The greatest danger is that the Internet would no longer be free. The world’s largest telecommunications companies would become the gatekeepers that control the flow of information and ideas. Thus, web sites like this one might function so poorly, because the corporate gate keepers do not approve of its content, that they would essentially become unusable. Web sites that provide a medium for writers who challenge the corporate paradigm, such as the one you are now reading, could operate so slow that they would lose all but the most loyal following.

In the familiar parlance of corporate speak the telecommunications companies and their puppets in Congress, for example, Alaska senator Ted Stevens, a republican, want us to believe that net neutrality amounts to burdensome regulation that stifles innovation and reduces corporate profits. The supporters of the telecommunications bill making its way through Congress are shameless promoters of predatory capitalism and they should be impeached.

If net neutrality is defeated the result will be a familiar one that characterizes all capitalist societies divided by class. Once again, it will be those with money who get preferential treatment. It will be much like our American coin operated congress in which capital is equated to free speech. Those with money will have access, those without will not.

It is dangerous to get between a Grizzly Bear and her cubs; but it is far more dangerous to get between a capitalist and his dollar. Men like Ted Stevens, who so typify Congress these days, are a slave to his corporate pay masters. He does not serve the interest of the people or the commonwealth any more than do AT&T, Verizon and Comcast. Senator Steven’s abysmal voting record speaks for itself. It is all about socializing cost and privatizing wealth—predatory capitalism.

More information on net neutrality can be found at [link to www.savetheinternet.com] or [link to www.itsournet.org.]


Charles Sullivan is a photographer, free lance writer and social justice activist residing in the hinterland of West Virginia. He welcomes your comments at earthdog@highstream.net
'Link, Copy, Paste, & Disseminate!'
BUSH MUST GO (OP)

User ID: 105879
United States
06/19/2006 09:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: A PLEA FOR NET NEUTRALITY by Charles Sullivan: The greatest danger is that the Internet would no longer be free. (MORE INFO ADDED)
Received this in my e-mail from MoveOn.org [link to moveon.org] ...

"As millions of us raised our voices to defend the free and open Internet 2, Internet operators like AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast spent millions lobbying the Houseof Representatives to kill Net Neutrality. A majority of the House members caved—voting for a telecommunications law that would give these companies more control over what you see and do online.

All eyes are now on the Senate, which considers Net Neutrality this month. We face a more friendly environment there, but we've got to act fast—the telecomlobbyists are working on every vote."



CONTACT INFO:

THE COMPLETE LIST OF E-MAIL ADDRESSES & FAX NUMBERS FOR CONGRESS, SENATE & GOVERNORS [link to www.conservativeusa.org]

CONGRESSIONAL E-MAIL DIRECTORY
[link to www.webslingerz.com]

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES INFO
[link to clerk.house.gov]

U.S. SENATE INFO
[link to senate.gov]



"Tell your Senators to protect Net Neutrality by supporting the bipartisan Snowe-Dorgan Internet Freedom Preservation Act (S. 2917).

When you call your House member, let them know that when the free and open Internet is at stake, that's a serious issue—it affects everything. Voting for any bill that does not protect Net Neutrality is absolutely inexcusable.

Thanks for keeping the pressure on Congress as we fight to save the Internet.

–Eli Pariser, Adam Green, Noah T. Winer, and the MoveOn.org Civic Action team

Friday, June 16th, 2006

P.S. Here are the relevant votes:

Markey Net Neutrality Amendment (A vote for Internet freedom was "Aye"):
[link to clerk.house.gov]

Bad overall COPE telecommunications bill without Markey Amendment that passed the House and gutted Net Neutrality (A vote for Internet freedom was "No"): [link to clerk.house.gov]

Voting the wrong way on either orboth was a vote against Internet freedom—for which members of Congress should be help accountable.

The best way to fight back after calling Congress is to help expand the reach ofour coalition. Ask 5 friends to join our fight for Internet freedom by signing our petition to Congress: [link to civic.moveon.org]

If you are active in local organizations, ask them to join our coalition at: [link to www.savetheinternet.com]


Sources:

1) Vote tally on COPE telecommunications law (which guts Net Neutrality), June 8,2006
[link to clerk.house.gov]

2) "House Turns Deaf Ear To Net Neutrality," WebProNews.com, June 9, 2006
[link to www.moveon.org]
'Link, Copy, Paste, & Disseminate!'

News