Malaysian Airline Crashes On Anniversary of TWA FLIGHT 800 Crash** Flight 370 Psyop Underway | |
Simple27 User ID: 51550563 United States 04/09/2014 01:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well I am off to sleep, this thing keeps getting weirder, it does drag on but I am too damn stubborn to not stick with it at this point. Quoting: centrist77 Lol, you know I'm just playing and have supported this thread from the beginning. You've done an excellent job updating with what BS info we are given. : ) Sweet dreams! ~*Ride the Wave*~ |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 54521115 United States 04/09/2014 01:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well I am off to sleep, this thing keeps getting weirder, it does drag on but I am too damn stubborn to not stick with it at this point. Quoting: centrist77 :s27say: Lol, you know I'm just playing and have supported this thread from the beginning. You've done an excellent job updating with what BS info we are given. : ) Sweet dreams! Thanks Simp, lol, trying to keep the biggest mind fuck psyop of all time organized has been rather fun. I enjoy it though because it helps me keep somewhat of a handle on it. I know this thread can be overwhelming to people and there is a lot of fatigue even on GLP about MH370. However, there has really never been anything like this. Even today, the pings cant just be next to each other, no...they have to be 20 kilometers apart. It has been a mind fuck at every turn. In addition, there have been a ton of counter intelligence stories already made up and designed to conflict with one another so the truth is hard to even zero in on. I want to thank those that followed it up till now. Especially uscrusader1 and LBJ who I can always count on to keep it going with me when everyone wants to pull their hair out if they hear about the plane one more time, lol. I will say though, stick with this, mysteries like this one will still be having mystery documentaries on them when we are old farts. Finally, this thing has not disappointed yet, maybe it has a grand finale. |
Simple27 User ID: 51550563 United States 04/09/2014 01:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well I am off to sleep, this thing keeps getting weirder, it does drag on but I am too damn stubborn to not stick with it at this point. Quoting: centrist77 Lol, you know I'm just playing and have supported this thread from the beginning. You've done an excellent job updating with what BS info we are given. : ) Sweet dreams! Thanks Simp, lol, trying to keep the biggest mind fuck psyop of all time organized has been rather fun. I enjoy it though because it helps me keep somewhat of a handle on it. I know this thread can be overwhelming to people and there is a lot of fatigue even on GLP about MH370. However, there has really never been anything like this. Even today, the pings cant just be next to each other, no...they have to be 20 kilometers apart. It has been a mind fuck at every turn. In addition, there have been a ton of counter intelligence stories already made up and designed to conflict with one another so the truth is hard to even zero in on. I want to thank those that followed it up till now. Especially uscrusader1 and LBJ who I can always count on to keep it going with me when everyone wants to pull their hair out if they hear about the plane one more time, lol. I will say though, stick with this, mysteries like this one will still be having mystery documentaries on them when we are old farts. Finally, this thing has not disappointed yet, maybe it has a grand finale. Agreed ;-) ~*Ride the Wave*~ |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56530020 United States 04/09/2014 12:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8687891 United States 04/09/2014 01:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | China refused to even talk to any of the other 7 countries boats in the water over there for a whole day. Quoting: centrist77 They needed approval to speak English. :ror: I had thought I for once might have given China some credit a few pages back. Honestly now, I think they dipped a few microphones from Radioshack into the water. Yeah, those are the guys that are so gonna kick our asses, pffff. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 39903149 United States 04/09/2014 01:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
uscrusader1 User ID: 9491757 United States 04/09/2014 01:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | China refused to even talk to any of the other 7 countries boats in the water over there for a whole day. Quoting: centrist77 They needed approval to speak English. I had thought I for once might have given China some credit a few pages back. Honestly now, I think they dipped a few microphones from Radioshack into the water. Yeah, those are the guys that are so gonna kick our asses, pffff. SOMEONE needed to check the ocean between Mali and DG, in the 30 days after the crash, in case a jumbo jet jihad was stopped in it's tracks. But we all know how China might react to that, not good. Instead and intentionally every other part of the ocean is being searched. Now pinger is dead, and wreckage has drifted(or been cleaned up). But again there are plenty of B52 sized hangars on DG that would hide a night landing o an Airbus LBT. |
uscrusader1 User ID: 9491757 United States 04/09/2014 02:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The island and military base Diego Garcia. |
jacobs ladder User ID: 55298677 United States 04/09/2014 02:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've really enjoyed the info on this thread. Great job! I thought I'd share this article that came out today about China. They seem to be flexing their muscles so to speak and thought it might be relevant for what it's worth. [link to freebeacon.com] |
uscrusader1 User ID: 9491757 United States 04/09/2014 02:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've really enjoyed the info on this thread. Great job! I thought I'd share this article that came out today about China. They seem to be flexing their muscles so to speak and thought it might be relevant for what it's worth. Quoting: jacobs ladder [link to freebeacon.com] Good info about Chicom carrier, seems to be down... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8687891 United States 04/09/2014 03:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've really enjoyed the info on this thread. Great job! I thought I'd share this article that came out today about China. They seem to be flexing their muscles so to speak and thought it might be relevant for what it's worth. Quoting: jacobs ladder [link to freebeacon.com] I think tensions are much higher in those waters than we think. China has been upset since the get go, logically meaning they know something and they are not playing quiet so I would think they do not know what is going on or feel like something is being withheld from them. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 39139288 Australia 04/10/2014 08:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How to hide a plane, once it has landed, and stop any in or outgoing transmissions? You put it in a big faraday cage. But something like that surely doesn't exist.... :cagedplane: These are purpose built for a particular aircraft whose multi-million dollar paint job washes off in the rain. Where might these be? |
Fatstogie User ID: 54025997 United States 04/10/2014 08:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8687891 United States 04/10/2014 09:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8687891 United States 04/10/2014 09:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How to hide a plane, once it has landed, and stop any in or outgoing transmissions? Quoting: BadHairDay You put it in a big faraday cage. But something like that surely doesn't exist.... :cagedplane: These are purpose built for a particular aircraft whose multi-million dollar paint job washes off in the rain. Where might these be? A team of guys could cover that plane and hide it within minutes. The only system left to turn off upon landing was the SATCOM. The last trasmission was a bizarre and garbled "ping handshake" that the plane initiated outside of the automatically generated hourly handshakes. The media tried to say the unscheduled transmission was from the plane hitting the water. If you take an alarm clock and throw it into the water at 500mph it probably wont ring early, it just breaks. The unscheduled handshake attempt from the plane would more likely come from the someone turning off the final engine monitoring and SATCOM connections right after a landing. The plane might notice the feed from an engine had just been cut and would try to "talk out" and say that. This argument could be made for crashing, I would just think ripping apart from hitting the water would have left it in no shape for that. |
uscrusader1 User ID: 9491757 United States 04/10/2014 09:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How to hide a plane, once it has landed, and stop any in or outgoing transmissions? Quoting: BadHairDay You put it in a big faraday cage. But something like that surely doesn't exist.... :cagedplane: These are purpose built for a particular aircraft whose multi-million dollar paint job washes off in the rain. Where might these be? A team of guys could cover that plane and hide it within minutes. The only system left to turn off upon landing was the SATCOM. The last trasmission was a bizarre and garbled "ping handshake" that the plane initiated outside of the automatically generated hourly handshakes. The media tried to say the unscheduled transmission was from the plane hitting the water. If you take an alarm clock and throw it into the water at 500mph it probably wont ring early, it just breaks. The unscheduled handshake attempt from the plane would more likely come from the someone turning off the final engine monitoring and SATCOM connections right after a landing. The plane might notice the feed from an engine had just been cut and would try to "talk out" and say that. This argument could be made for crashing, I would just think ripping apart from hitting the water would have left it in no shape for that. B52's on DG have hangar(s), I did a size comparison between the B52 and the missing LBT and found it would allow it to fit with room to spare. Last Edited by uscrusader1 on 04/10/2014 11:01 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43542426 United States 04/10/2014 09:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How to hide a plane, once it has landed, and stop any in or outgoing transmissions? Quoting: BadHairDay You put it in a big faraday cage. But something like that surely doesn't exist.... :cagedplane: These are purpose built for a particular aircraft whose multi-million dollar paint job washes off in the rain. Where might these be? A team of guys could cover that plane and hide it within minutes. The only system left to turn off upon landing was the SATCOM. The last trasmission was a bizarre and garbled "ping handshake" that the plane initiated outside of the automatically generated hourly handshakes. The media tried to say the unscheduled transmission was from the plane hitting the water. If you take an alarm clock and throw it into the water at 500mph it probably wont ring early, it just breaks. The unscheduled handshake attempt from the plane would more likely come from the someone turning off the final engine monitoring and SATCOM connections right after a landing. The plane might notice the feed from an engine had just been cut and would try to "talk out" and say that. This argument could be made for crashing, I would just think ripping apart from hitting the water would have left it in no shape for that. B52's on DG have hangars, I did a size comparison between the B52 and the missing LBT and found it would allow it to fit with room to spare. Sorry, that is a B2 enclosure and is only used for the B2. B-52's always have and still... sit on the ramp. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8687891 United States 04/10/2014 10:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How to hide a plane, once it has landed, and stop any in or outgoing transmissions? Quoting: BadHairDay You put it in a big faraday cage. But something like that surely doesn't exist.... :cagedplane: These are purpose built for a particular aircraft whose multi-million dollar paint job washes off in the rain. Where might these be? A team of guys could cover that plane and hide it within minutes. The only system left to turn off upon landing was the SATCOM. The last trasmission was a bizarre and garbled "ping handshake" that the plane initiated outside of the automatically generated hourly handshakes. The media tried to say the unscheduled transmission was from the plane hitting the water. If you take an alarm clock and throw it into the water at 500mph it probably wont ring early, it just breaks. The unscheduled handshake attempt from the plane would more likely come from the someone turning off the final engine monitoring and SATCOM connections right after a landing. The plane might notice the feed from an engine had just been cut and would try to "talk out" and say that. This argument could be made for crashing, I would just think ripping apart from hitting the water would have left it in no shape for that. B52's on DG have hangars, I did a size comparison between the B52 and the missing LBT and found it would allow it to fit with room to spare. Hey crusader, hang with me here, I think some new data coming out coincides with data from some witnesses from the very beginning. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43542426 United States 04/10/2014 10:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How to hide a plane, once it has landed, and stop any in or outgoing transmissions? Quoting: BadHairDay You put it in a big faraday cage. But something like that surely doesn't exist.... :cagedplane: These are purpose built for a particular aircraft whose multi-million dollar paint job washes off in the rain. Where might these be? A team of guys could cover that plane and hide it within minutes. The only system left to turn off upon landing was the SATCOM. The last trasmission was a bizarre and garbled "ping handshake" that the plane initiated outside of the automatically generated hourly handshakes. The media tried to say the unscheduled transmission was from the plane hitting the water. If you take an alarm clock and throw it into the water at 500mph it probably wont ring early, it just breaks. The unscheduled handshake attempt from the plane would more likely come from the someone turning off the final engine monitoring and SATCOM connections right after a landing. The plane might notice the feed from an engine had just been cut and would try to "talk out" and say that. This argument could be made for crashing, I would just think ripping apart from hitting the water would have left it in no shape for that. B52's on DG have hangars, I did a size comparison between the B52 and the missing LBT and found it would allow it to fit with room to spare. [link to www.zianet.com] |
uscrusader1 User ID: 9491757 United States 04/10/2014 10:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How to hide a plane, once it has landed, and stop any in or outgoing transmissions? Quoting: BadHairDay You put it in a big faraday cage. But something like that surely doesn't exist.... :cagedplane: These are purpose built for a particular aircraft whose multi-million dollar paint job washes off in the rain. Where might these be? A team of guys could cover that plane and hide it within minutes. The only system left to turn off upon landing was the SATCOM. The last trasmission was a bizarre and garbled "ping handshake" that the plane initiated outside of the automatically generated hourly handshakes. The media tried to say the unscheduled transmission was from the plane hitting the water. If you take an alarm clock and throw it into the water at 500mph it probably wont ring early, it just breaks. The unscheduled handshake attempt from the plane would more likely come from the someone turning off the final engine monitoring and SATCOM connections right after a landing. The plane might notice the feed from an engine had just been cut and would try to "talk out" and say that. This argument could be made for crashing, I would just think ripping apart from hitting the water would have left it in no shape for that. B52's on DG have hangars, I did a size comparison between the B52 and the missing LBT and found it would allow it to fit with room to spare. Sorry, that is a B2 enclosure and is only used for the B2. B-52's always have and still... sit on the ramp. Right. The B52 is dwarfed by it's 'hard structure' hangar, probably could fit 2-3 in at once. Don't have to be a spook to goog those on DG. |
uscrusader1 User ID: 9491757 United States 04/10/2014 11:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How to hide a plane, once it has landed, and stop any in or outgoing transmissions? Quoting: BadHairDay You put it in a big faraday cage. But something like that surely doesn't exist.... :cagedplane: These are purpose built for a particular aircraft whose multi-million dollar paint job washes off in the rain. Where might these be? A team of guys could cover that plane and hide it within minutes. The only system left to turn off upon landing was the SATCOM. The last trasmission was a bizarre and garbled "ping handshake" that the plane initiated outside of the automatically generated hourly handshakes. The media tried to say the unscheduled transmission was from the plane hitting the water. If you take an alarm clock and throw it into the water at 500mph it probably wont ring early, it just breaks. The unscheduled handshake attempt from the plane would more likely come from the someone turning off the final engine monitoring and SATCOM connections right after a landing. The plane might notice the feed from an engine had just been cut and would try to "talk out" and say that. This argument could be made for crashing, I would just think ripping apart from hitting the water would have left it in no shape for that. B52's on DG have hangars, I did a size comparison between the B52 and the missing LBT and found it would allow it to fit with room to spare. Hey crusader, hang with me here, I think some new data coming out coincides with data from some witnesses from the very beginning. Talked to Navy AF guy who flew DG, said it was more of an coral aircraft carrier :), but the passenger jet could probably do it. And most of my previous posts were accurate. Also the Indian Ocean is so desolate to fly, just nothing there, easy to lose something . Last Edited by uscrusader1 on 04/10/2014 11:18 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8488516 United States 04/10/2014 11:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here is one of the two eyewitness accounts that we had deternmined as being the most credible earlier in the thread. It looks like we have confirmation. "In the middle of the night, two fishermen near the Malaysia-Thailand border saw a plane flying low over the South China Sea -- at the same time that air traffic controllers lost contact with Flight 370 over the same body of water, at 1:30 a.m. or almost 50 minutes after takeoff. Fisherman Azid Ibrahim and a friend had taken people fishing that night off the coast of Kota Bharu. "I was fishing when I saw the plane -- it looked strange. Flying low. I told my friend that's not normal. Normally, it flies at 35,000 feet. But that night it touched the clouds. I thought the pilot must be crazy," Ibrahim said. "It was really low. I saw the lights they looked like the size of a coconut," he said. Their fishing grounds lay under a flight path, but the predawn plane was unusual to see because of its low altitude, they said. The fishermen filed a police report about their sighting, but Malaysian officials haven't commented." [link to www.cnn.com] Here is the latest update saying the plane now went down to 4,000 feet and would confirm the eyewitness acct above. "Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 disappeared from military radar for about 120 nautical miles after it crossed back over the Malaysian Peninsula, sources say. Based on available data, this means the plane must have dipped in altitude to between 4,000 and 5,000 feet, a senior Malaysian government official and a source involved in the investigation tell CNN." [link to www.cnn.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8488516 United States 04/10/2014 11:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Good work everyone, the eyewitness statemen above is one of the two we had determined was probably real. Today, after weeks of deniala, the truth came out and we were right. Good work people. :russiachinaplane: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 8488516 United States 04/10/2014 12:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Remeber a page or two back when I said I am sensing a grand finale to all this. The countries invovled have had 100 chances to cover this up and make it go away. It is occupying a lot of news time, but here on GLP we would have caught a story that is was trying to deviate from if that were the case. Russia is still getting a good amount coverage. Well it is weird but I say the Maldives is where we look next. Lets make sure there is not some stupid airstrip from WW2 or Vietnam that was never an official runway that could blow this case open next. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56648293 United States 04/10/2014 05:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 39139288 Australia 04/10/2014 05:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 39139288 Australia 04/10/2014 05:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How to hide a plane, once it has landed, and stop any in or outgoing transmissions? Quoting: BadHairDay You put it in a big faraday cage. But something like that surely doesn't exist.... :cagedplane: These are purpose built for a particular aircraft whose multi-million dollar paint job washes off in the rain. Where might these be? A team of guys could cover that plane and hide it within minutes. The only system left to turn off upon landing was the SATCOM. The last trasmission was a bizarre and garbled "ping handshake" that the plane initiated outside of the automatically generated hourly handshakes. The media tried to say the unscheduled transmission was from the plane hitting the water. If you take an alarm clock and throw it into the water at 500mph it probably wont ring early, it just breaks. The unscheduled handshake attempt from the plane would more likely come from the someone turning off the final engine monitoring and SATCOM connections right after a landing. The plane might notice the feed from an engine had just been cut and would try to "talk out" and say that. This argument could be made for crashing, I would just think ripping apart from hitting the water would have left it in no shape for that. B52's on DG have hangars, I did a size comparison between the B52 and the missing LBT and found it would allow it to fit with room to spare. Sorry, that is a B2 enclosure and is only used for the B2. B-52's always have and still... sit on the ramp. [link to www.zianet.com] ** despite this being my argument that they hid the aircraft in one of these four hangars, I'm now struggling to see a 777 fitting in there, even diagonally... dang... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 43658232 United States 04/10/2014 06:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Remeber a page or two back when I said I am sensing a grand finale to all this. Quoting: centrist77 The countries invovled have had 100 chances to cover this up and make it go away. It is occupying a lot of news time, but here on GLP we would have caught a story that is was trying to deviate from if that were the case. Russia is still getting a good amount coverage. Well it is weird but I say the Maldives is where we look next. Lets make sure there is not some stupid airstrip from WW2 or Vietnam that was never an official runway that could blow this case open next. Do you mean the fisherman in Kuda Huvadhoo who said it was headed to Addu City? Male has a runway long enough to land a 777, if I recall from researching a few weeks ago. Sorry I'm late to the afternoon conversation here, lol. Here is an article I pulled up, time frame closest to the earliest Maldives sighting... [link to www.cryptonews.biz] |
uscrusader1 User ID: 9491757 United States 04/10/2014 06:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: centrist77 A team of guys could cover that plane and hide it within minutes. The only system left to turn off upon landing was the SATCOM. The last trasmission was a bizarre and garbled "ping handshake" that the plane initiated outside of the automatically generated hourly handshakes. The media tried to say the unscheduled transmission was from the plane hitting the water. If you take an alarm clock and throw it into the water at 500mph it probably wont ring early, it just breaks. The unscheduled handshake attempt from the plane would more likely come from the someone turning off the final engine monitoring and SATCOM connections right after a landing. The plane might notice the feed from an engine had just been cut and would try to "talk out" and say that. This argument could be made for crashing, I would just think ripping apart from hitting the water would have left it in no shape for that. B52's on DG have hangars, I did a size comparison between the B52 and the missing LBT and found it would allow it to fit with room to spare. Sorry, that is a B2 enclosure and is only used for the B2. B-52's always have and still... sit on the ramp. [link to www.zianet.com] ** despite this being my argument that they hid the aircraft in one of these four hangars, I'm now struggling to see a 777 fitting in there, even diagonally... dang... no, no, no They probably used the solid structure hangars on the island, from the looks of them 3 B52's could fit. Probably others there to use too. Goog earth pics seem doctored, but they are there. |
uscrusader1 User ID: 9491757 United States 04/10/2014 06:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Remeber a page or two back when I said I am sensing a grand finale to all this. Quoting: centrist77 The countries invovled have had 100 chances to cover this up and make it go away. It is occupying a lot of news time, but here on GLP we would have caught a story that is was trying to deviate from if that were the case. Russia is still getting a good amount coverage. Well it is weird but I say the Maldives is where we look next. Lets make sure there is not some stupid airstrip from WW2 or Vietnam that was never an official runway that could blow this case open next. Do you mean the fisherman in Kuda Huvadhoo who said it was headed to Addu City? Male has a runway long enough to land a 777, if I recall from researching a few weeks ago. Sorry I'm late to the afternoon conversation here, lol. Here is an article I pulled up, time frame closest to the earliest Maldives sighting... [link to www.cryptonews.biz] It was a CNN interview, low alt, Malaysian Airlines paint, NW-SE path, I don't remember if they said where he was. |