Weird painting on the wall as Britain's Queen Elizabeth II meets Pope Francis

well it looks to me as though the angel on the right is taking a pee through some sort of catheter. hmmmmm.....

the most powerful being on the planet was not even in that room

It is really weird. It looks like maybe the same artist that painted in the Denvor airport maybe. I can't really get a good look a this painting but it just seems creepy and maybe significant in some way.

cnn.com...

no thanks, I like news networks.

[link to i3.mirror.co.uk]

bit bigger, I'll keep looking. good find op.

If anyone has any info on the artist, that would be great. All I know is what it looks like. I still can't see it very well. It really looks like two angels holding some sort of antenae that is projecting an image of a man hugging an alien.

I always thought we'd be decieved that way. Some sort of demons or something come back and say they are actually our creators and project something like this into the sky for us to believe it. Most people will believe it when they see it up in the sky like that.

It is project blue beam or something. They did it over Norway as a test and that was the Norway Spiral.

It will open up a Spiral in the sky and they will project some images in the sky so we should all make nice with one another and worship aliens.

this one large enough ??

[link to www.pri.org]

two angels turning two handles turning the world.

Interesting

It still looks like a man hugging an alien. That head is too bald and bulbous looking and the body is too thin.

The head is round, due to the space theme.

So, they're probably trying mix in the space theme, with the heads / planets.

Definitely interesting

I also see a ying yang symbol and some other kind of symbols. All religions are mixing maybe? They want to unite the world's religions? It could be a baby he is holding? It looks like an alien but it could be a baby antichrist.

I see some zodiac symbols

I'd be more interested in the symbols around the circles in the picture and their placement.

What's up with the mummy on his cross?

I know what it means. I could tell you, but even then it would take some research on your part. I simply refuse to take a crap-load of time to explain it just to have some pre-teen basement dweller throw up a BS flag. It touches on something I have researched academically.

If you are serious about wanting to know I can lead you in the right direction but I refuse to explain it all. It would take a great deal of time and the maturity level(and intelligence) of most of the participants of this forum is not conducive to having a real discussion anyway. I am certainly not lumping EVERYONE into that category- but I am sure you know what I mean.

Ummmm, no, the "angel" on the right (it is actually a demon)is holding a light to "Illuminate" the union. Also, notice that the light is crooked.

^^^^^^^^^ to see the answer to this one!!

I have a basic question. Is the configuration depicting past, present, or future? Near future? Ancient past?

Anything to do with Cern or the Norway Spiral? Findings in Physics or Astrology?

That is an excellent question and I do not mean to be elusive but it represents future/present

Also I mentioned above regarding the angel "demon" holding a light- it IS a light but notice it is coming from his genitals and that the "couple" is in what looks to be an embryo- the angels "light" is penetrating the "egg" or "embryo".....

no

so you being the expert and all... could you just tell me what the painting is called? I'd prefer my own conclusions on its meaning anyway. thanks in advance. (I won't be holding me breath.)

I was joking you moronic yank. ffs.... anyway, it looks like both angels are holding a crank of some sort, maybe to make the firmament (with the zodiac symbols) go round.

The symbol on the bottom of ( in the 6 o'clock position) is the sign for Pisces which to signifies the church age- what this picture is signifying ties into New Age as well as Luciferian doctrine.

oh, so you're a god bothering moron.... why didn't you just say so? now I can ignore you.

Yes, please. Can you tell us the name of the painting? I've been looking for the past 20 minutes. Please!

I did not once say I knew what the painting was called, I said I know what it means. There is a big difference. This is precisely why I prefer to keep my mouth shut on forums such as these and release things academically. Please by all means find your own meaning- I would always encourage people to research on their own. Its admirable that you are not a sheep- slightly rude, but certainly not a sheep.

Also, let's say for the sake of argument, that you do indeed find the name of the work and the artist. will you accept his or her interpretation? Did knowing the artist for the Denver murals help with their interpretation? Did you believe his interpretation?