Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,511 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 785,343
Pageviews Today: 1,167,713Threads Today: 316Posts Today: 6,993
10:44 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 57293235
United States
04/26/2014 03:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
The theory of evolution at its core is used to convince man that he is an animal and that laws/forces of nature are his 'God'.
"mother nature"
"animal planet"

Its not a coincidence that man's argument for homosexuality today is that "animals do it". At its core, it is man's rejection of being created in the image and likeness of His Creator and his acceptance of being created in the image and likeness of a beast.

Darwin's entire family were Freemasons. Freemasons reject Jesus Christ as the way, the truth and the life and therefore the way to destroy the descendants of Christians was simply to make them believe that there is no Creator. Enter the theory of evolution taught for decades as man arising from apes. And we for the most part believed this science falsely called.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57308968


darwin wasnt the first to discover evolution. darwin discovered natural selection. evolution has been known for centuries
 Quoting: Nachos
still on your "opinion in search of evidence" crusade?
Nachos

User ID: 57273510
Australia
04/26/2014 03:42 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
Evolution is a scam. It's a theory. One person's theory. It's not a proven fact. When you think about it, it kind of sounds like a 5 year old made it up.

Didn't Darwin have a bunch of kids with his sister and they all died or ended up in mental institutions?
That's what's wrong with those people. They're inbred.
 Quoting: soprettie1


According to creationists, everybody is inbred.
Debunking "Evolution Vs God"
[link to www.youtube.com]
Engonoceras

User ID: 40574759
United States
04/26/2014 03:50 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
If evolution is fake,what about dinosaurs?
Did they really lived and died millions years ago?
What about transitional fossils like Archaeopteryx?
Did they proof dinosaurs evolved into birds?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57281494


Archaeopteryx is not a transitional fossil from dinosaurs to birds. Protoavis shares 32 skull feature with modern day crows and existed at least 210 million years ago, 75 million years before archaeopteryx meaning they were hunting with early dinosaurs. Agenda scientists call this a problematic taxon, and some even doubt it is actually a bird. This is because it doesn't fit into their idea of world history. Protoavis is a bird clear as day.

Natural Selection is real. Evolution is not.
 Quoting: ScandiaKing 45555331


Archaeopteryx shares features of reptiles and birds but that's NOT the same as directly "transitional". When you only have THAT fossil then yeah it's get put high on the list of "missing links" but anything older that's discovered after can knock it off the list. Really no one can really prove 100% where it fits in the lineage. It could just be a side branch that went extinct after true birds came along and supplanted it's niche.

Paleontology evolves based on newer and more complete data.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 57281494
Croatia
04/26/2014 04:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
One last thing guys,one of member on GLP suggest me to watch lecture of now dead Lloyd Pye.
Pye talked about human origins and how aliens created humans 300-400 thousand years ago.
Here is video link:

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

I would really like to hear your opinion about this,since many people think he's right.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 57281494
Croatia
04/26/2014 04:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
I'll bump this thread until Nachos and Engonoceras don't see it.
peace
concrete blonde

User ID: 54226913
United States
04/26/2014 04:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
it is fake.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 57281494
Croatia
04/26/2014 04:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
it is fake.
 Quoting: concrete blonde


Did you read Nachos' posts?
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 57281494
Croatia
04/26/2014 04:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
bump
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 57281494
Croatia
04/26/2014 05:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
bump
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 57281494
Croatia
04/26/2014 05:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
bump
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 57281494
Croatia
04/26/2014 05:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
burnit
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 57293235
United States
04/26/2014 05:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
it is fake.
 Quoting: concrete blonde


Did you read Nachos' posts?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57281494
Why, he never post's anything more then hypothetical opinion.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 57293235
United States
04/26/2014 05:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
Evolution is a scam. It's a theory. One person's theory. It's not a proven fact. When you think about it, it kind of sounds like a 5 year old made it up.

Didn't Darwin have a bunch of kids with his sister and they all died or ended up in mental institutions?
That's what's wrong with those people. They're inbred.
 Quoting: soprettie1


According to creationists, everybody is inbred.
 Quoting: Nachos
If evolution were true, there would have been inbreeding.
Galfeslaf
The King of Greenland

User ID: 39292843
United States
04/26/2014 05:25 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
like duh
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55920081


Why are 99% scientists believe in evolution then?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57281494


They don't believe in evolution in all its forms. They can prove that microevolution exists, but not macroevolution. However, because they are stupid humans, they believe that through sophistic arguments coupled with popularity, they can create "truth" where there is none and use it as an excuse for their adoption of such false beliefs in order to fool God into believing they were genuinely led to believe falsities, as if God cannot read their hearts and know their most inner thoughts.

Their adoption of the belief of macroevolution is nothing more than an excuse to not admit they believe they are held accountable by a higher power - especially if the higher power has absolute truth on its side, as this would mean their imagined moral freedom to "do as thou wilt" is folly.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 57281494
Croatia
04/26/2014 05:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
it is fake.
 Quoting: concrete blonde


Did you read Nachos' posts?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57281494
Why, he never post's anything more then hypothetical opinion.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57293235


But what about this:

[link to answers.yahoo.com (secure)]

Check out what other people think,if you don't like Nachos opinion.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31101464
Australia
04/26/2014 05:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
like duh
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55920081


Why are 99% scientists believe in evolution then?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57281494


Cause 99% of them were taught it.

DUH.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 57293235
United States
04/26/2014 05:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
it is fake.
 Quoting: concrete blonde


Did you read Nachos' posts?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57281494
Why, he never post's anything more then hypothetical opinion.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57293235


But what about this:

[link to answers.yahoo.com (secure)]

Check out what other people think,if you don't like Nachos opinion.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57281494
I see opinions, yet no observable evidence.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 57293235
United States
04/26/2014 05:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
How long has life been on this planet, yet in all that time, there is no observable or reproduceable evidence for darwinian evolution? How much blind faith do you have to have???
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 42709402
Philippines
04/26/2014 05:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
op obviously evilution is fake
Engonoceras

User ID: 40574759
United States
04/26/2014 05:44 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
like duh
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55920081


Why are 99% scientists believe in evolution then?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57281494


They don't believe in evolution in all its forms. They can prove that microevolution exists, but not macroevolution. However, because they are stupid humans, they believe that through sophistic arguments coupled with popularity, they can create "truth" where there is none and use it as an excuse for their adoption of such false beliefs in order to fool God into believing they were genuinely led to believe falsities, as if God cannot read their hearts and know their most inner thoughts.

Their adoption of the belief of macroevolution is nothing more than an excuse to not admit they believe they are held accountable by a higher power - especially if the higher power has absolute truth on its side, as this would mean their imagined moral freedom to "do as thou wilt" is folly.
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


As I stated earlier the details of Evolution (and the geologic record) are detailed in 10s of thousands of scientific papers that have been published continually for at least 100 years. The earliest papers WERE sketchy because of the relative lack of good complete fossils and less than modern techniques of study.

In the interviewing years many animals have been reassigned to different genuses and species as more fossils are discovered.

"Evolution" is not some idea a bunch of God-hating scientists cooked up.

Most of the detailed work that has been done over the years most people (especially Creationists) have no clue about.

But, I can understand how something like a 100 page study on Ammonite zonation of the Western Interior Seaway or a study of global eustatic sea levels cross correlated with Texas and French ammonite records might be too much to try and absorb.

Professional "Creationists" (the ones making money) surely must KNOW the enormity of the scientific data that's been published and how simple it is for a lay person to find fossils and investigate the geologic column themselves but they'll never tell you that. I just did.

By the way, science NEVER claims to have 100% of the answers to anything. Every new discovery changes something or at least fills in more details.

Last Edited by Engonoceras on 04/26/2014 06:01 PM
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 57281494
Croatia
04/26/2014 05:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
...


Did you read Nachos' posts?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57281494
Why, he never post's anything more then hypothetical opinion.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57293235


But what about this:

[link to answers.yahoo.com (secure)]

Check out what other people think,if you don't like Nachos opinion.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57281494
I see opinions, yet no observable evidence.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57293235


What about this:

[link to evolutionfaq.com]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 57281494
Croatia
04/26/2014 06:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
bump
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 57281494
Croatia
04/26/2014 06:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
bump
Galfeslaf
The King of Greenland

User ID: 39292843
United States
04/26/2014 06:22 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
like duh
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55920081


Why are 99% scientists believe in evolution then?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57281494


They don't believe in evolution in all its forms. They can prove that microevolution exists, but not macroevolution. However, because they are stupid humans, they believe that through sophistic arguments coupled with popularity, they can create "truth" where there is none and use it as an excuse for their adoption of such false beliefs in order to fool God into believing they were genuinely led to believe falsities, as if God cannot read their hearts and know their most inner thoughts.

Their adoption of the belief of macroevolution is nothing more than an excuse to not admit they believe they are held accountable by a higher power - especially if the higher power has absolute truth on its side, as this would mean their imagined moral freedom to "do as thou wilt" is folly.
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


As I stated earlier the details of Evolution (and the geologic record) are detailed in 10s of thousands of scientific papers that have been published continually for at least 100 years. The earliest papers WERE sketchy because of the relative lack of good complete fossils and less than modern techniques of study.

In the interviewing years many animals have been reassigned to different genuses and species as more fossils are discovered.

"Evolution" is not some idea a bunch of God-hating scientists cooked up.

Most of the detailed work that has been done over the years most people (especially Creationists) have no clue about.

But, I can understand how something like a 100 page study on Ammonite zonation of the Western Interior Seaway or a study of global eustatic sea levels cross correlated with Texas and French ammonite records might be too much to try and absorb.

Professional "Creationists" (the ones making money) surely must KNOW the enormity of the scientific data that's been published and how simple it is for a lay person to find fossils and investigate the geologic column themselves but they'll never tell you that. I just did.

By the way, science NEVER claims to have 100% of the answers to anything. Every new discovery changes something or at least fills in more details.
 Quoting: Engonoceras


Again, another evolutionist trying to pass off microevolution as proof of macroevolution.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 57281494
Croatia
04/26/2014 06:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
Let's wait for Engonoceras and Nachos to reply.
PS

Im going to get some sleep,i'll bump this thread tomorrow.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 57293235
United States
04/26/2014 07:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
...
Why, he never post's anything more then hypothetical opinion.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57293235


But what about this:

[link to answers.yahoo.com (secure)]

Check out what other people think,if you don't like Nachos opinion.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57281494
I see opinions, yet no observable evidence.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57293235


What about this:

[link to evolutionfaq.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57281494

You do understand, that to be scientific fact, it must be observable and reproduceable.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 57293235
United States
04/26/2014 07:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
How long has life been on this planet, yet in all that time, there is no observable or reproduceable evidence for darwinian evolution? How much blind faith do you have to have???
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57293235
As I said, where are the thousands of years of supposed transitional fossils? There should be millions.
Galfeslaf
The King of Greenland

User ID: 39292843
United States
04/26/2014 07:34 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
How long has life been on this planet, yet in all that time, there is no observable or reproduceable evidence for darwinian evolution? How much blind faith do you have to have???
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57293235
As I said, where are the thousands of years of supposed transitional fossils? There should be millions.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57293235


They could just make a descriptive theoretical model explaining how necessary adaptations for survival slowly create entire new organs with new functionality within organisms that will not benefit from the still-forming organs in their lifetime, and are thus not "more fit" to survive, but less-so (wasted energy)...and how that means they are actually "more fit" to survive and reproduce, even though they most likely won't survive the conditions that are forcing them to change.

If they can make that glaring contradiction work logically, I'm listening.
Engonoceras

User ID: 40574759
United States
04/26/2014 08:42 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
Again, another evolutionist trying to pass off microevolution as proof of macroevolution.
 Quoting: Galfeslaf


Given time PLUS distance critters that are only species level different become genus level different, then family level different, and so forth. Look up "ring species" to see how different species can arise.

Some species appear quickly and then have long ranges like ammonites where certain species can be documented for a few million years and then they vanish from the record.

Some species have very short ranges like foramnifera and can be used in high resolution chrono-stratigraphy to correlate limestone and shales regionally or even globally.

**

Transitional species quickly get supplanted by their newer more adapted descendants which is why there are fewer of them in the fossil record. It's MUCH harder to find something that may have existed a few hundred years than 100 thousand years in any geological layer.

Actually everything is in transition, the only difference is speed of change caused by outside factors.

Only so many variations of the same critter will physically occupy a certain niche and eventually older forms can get pushed out. You simply won't find like 100 species of clams or oysters in the same spot.

Humans used to have much larger heads which is why our modern smaller heads are having problems with too many teeth and why we all need our wisdom teeth pulled.

Me and many friends have actually discovered new species of this and that critter that lived such a short time span we are the ONLY ones that have found them.

If there was no "macro evolution" there should be NO fish-amphibian transition and yet they have been found, right in the geologic layer of the expected time range. Predictability proves theory.

Last Edited by Engonoceras on 04/26/2014 08:58 PM
Engonoceras

User ID: 40574759
United States
04/26/2014 09:06 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If Darwin was illuminati,does that means evolution is fake?
How long has life been on this planet, yet in all that time, there is no observable or reproduceable evidence for darwinian evolution? How much blind faith do you have to have???
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57293235
As I said, where are the thousands of years of supposed transitional fossils? There should be millions.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57293235


The transitional ones are always going to be a very small percent of the total amount of fossils and thus MUCH harder to find.

The question is inherently faulty because everything is technically a transitional form but sometimes the change was very fast and sometimes it stabilized for millions of years.

Oysters if arranged time wise by geologic layer will show transitions.

There's a nice chart documenting the evolution of Eohippus to modern horse over 40 million years.

Last Edited by Engonoceras on 04/26/2014 09:12 PM

News