Space-based weapon technology is our greatest threat. Rods from God test last week? Updates and images pg 4

That plant was blown up from a missile. For filing a law suit against Mon-satan you want proof?

[link to www.youtube.com]

go to :03 fire in the sky on the right

also my video
[link to www.youtube.com]


Texas fertilizer plant that exploded filed lawsuit against Monsanto in 2007
[link to www.naturalnews.com]


Why Would Anyone Want To Blow Up A West Texas Fertilizer Plant?

[link to freedomoutpost.com]


you can hear it and see it before the place blows up. In the second video the explosion is way off to the right.

That was

While these speeds are "re-entry" classification and very fast, they arent un-defendable against now. ICBMS were also un-defendable for a long time. Kinetic rods have been around since the 80's, so they aren't new.

So what can intercept an incoming rod traveling at Mach 9 or so? One of the U.S. hypersonic missiles that travels at 13,000 plus. The Chinese and Russians also have hypersonics. One of the Chinese hypersonic anti-ship missiles would give a carrier less than 10 seconds to react after detection, and the missile can skim the water at 1 meter if the seas cooperate, but usually skims at 5-20 meters. All hypersonics have been developed to be fired from land, sea(including subs), and air.

I believe hypersonics were actually conceived to counter kinetic weapons utilizing re-entry speeds. Russia and India are co-developing one right now that will be like the F-22 of hypersonic missile systems. It's called "Brahmos".

Don't know why I bother writing these. Nobody ever reads or comments anyway.

First, "Rods from God" sound really cool.

Thing is, you need a platform in space to launch from.

Then, you need to get these "rods" up there.

Tungsten is heavy, to a point that only a few could be feasibly launched, at once.

Once up there, they would need to be placed in the platform.

There is absolutely no way that is feasible.

Second..."scalar weapons". One of my pet-peeves.

Any and every report of these goes back to a single source.

Tom Beardon.

A known fraud.

Conspiracy theory is all fun and games, until the bullshit is exposed.

That's interesting. Thanks for sharing! I think I've mentioned this, but I think they are can silently drop them from the edge of space. By the time they are detected they have picked up enough speed and energy that they cannot be stopped.

Trust me they can get them up there, and I bet they are already up there....waiting to be dropped...NOT LAUNCHED.

I CANT STRESS THIS ENOUGH

If it is quietly dropped from space, it goes UNDETECTED until it lights up on re-entry, then APPEARS as a meteor...then the false flag is indeed the natural disaster...

You make a bold statement.

You can't launch anything without it being seen.

The X37B was top secret, yet tracked by amateur sky watchers.

I know for a fact that the rumored "second" X37B" existed in 2010, due to the fact a friend took pics of it, headed to Vandenburg on a trailer.

These days, it's quite difficult to put something in orbit, without it being tracked.

This isn't even going in to the support materiel and personnel needed to not only launch, but maintain a platform.

Sorry, but your theory holds water like a sieve.

Yep.

Black projects on YouTube.

Sounds legit.

Beardon is pretty damn crazy. I have no idea if scalar weapons are real, but scalar potential is definitely a real part of quantum physics.

As far as the rods go, I believe they're real simply because it's an elegantly brilliant way around the space weapon treaty, and you know damn well all the main players have space based weapons. The only thing that gives me pause on these being real is that the idea came from a science fiction writer that worked for DOD for a time. Everything else about rods seems solid.

The "Thor" satellite(s) would be launched as a single preloaded unit, so it wouldn't have to be "loaded" in space. Depletion of ammo would trigger the negation of the platform by self destruction.

Lastly, the heavy lift capacity of our rockets isn't truly known, IMO. I don't think the true thrust/weight ratios have ever been given. An Atlas V in the heavy lift configuration may be capable of carrying a lot more weight than is currently believed.

It's safe to say, though, that the smaller "crowbar" version could easily already be up there.

Well that's just like, your opinion, man.

Actually, it's well known.

We've used the same rockets for 30+ years.

And, payloads are known upon launch, or discovered after.

Again, amateurs see all, above.

If an astronaut does an EVA, it's known.

It's known which satellite it's being done on.

Again, it sounds cool, but....just not really doable.

Sooo.....it can cover the "entire Pacific Ocean"....

Exactly where did you see this, and it wasn't noticed ?

Hey AC, can you stop shitting all over my thread?

That'd be great, thanks.

impact is just before it hits the surface, a air burst I guess they call them, the fire spreads like a massive nuke, there was a rod orbiting earth but I believe it has been removed.

they put these rods in orbit of hostile planets for safety.

Last Edited by 0_ on 04/25/2014 08:02 PM

Umm....trying to figure out how how an explosion that can cover "the entire Pacific Ocean" went un-noticed.

Is that not a curiosity ?

Chelyabinsk Meteor:

Divers at a Russian lake have pulled out a 5-foot-wide, half-ton hunk of meteorite from the Chelyabinsk meteor that streaked across skies in February. The large black fragment, weighing more than half a ton, smashed a nearly 20-foot-wide hole into the ice covering Lake Chebarkul. It could potentially be the most massive fragment of the dramatic fireball captured on video across the region, and researchers are calling it a once in a lifetime moment.

The rock weighed in at 570 kilograms (about 1,257 pounds) but it may be heavier because it broke the scale, Smith noted -- and broke into pieces in the process as well.

It's heavier than it looks, too, she added.

"When you actually have a look at it, yeah, it’s big lump of rock, but it’s not actually enormous," Smith said. "Because with meteorites, most of them contain iron and nickel metal. So for their size, they’re quite dense rocks."

Even though this is a massive meteorite fragment, it’s a tiny portion of the original missile, a roughly 56-foot-wide space rock that traveled about 40,000 mph and vaporized roughly 15 miles above the surface, resulting in an explosion measured between 300 and 500 kilotons, roughly the same as a modern nuclear bomb, according to a Times report. Fragments rained down from the skies and several such meteorites have been collected since then.

[link to www.latimes.com]

Missile- interesting word choice

Naw you are fine...I was just puttin you on notice...lol

Sorry so long winded, my friend, but it's a complicated subject. Bear with me.....

I get where your coming from, but I'd have to think drop detection could be achieved by putting multiple, small M.A.D. equipped satellites into orbit. M.A.D. systems have been around since the 60's to detect metal submarines under water. You'd have to think these systems have been upgraded quite a bit since then.

As far as your point on rods speed and energy being unstoppable goes, well it's not accurate. A hypersonic missile traveling half again as fast as the inbound, Mach 16 or so, would produce a HELL of a lot of kinetic energy from its speed alone, but it doesn't end there. That wouldn't be enough to stop the inbound, assuming its the 9-ton variety.

The rod has more mass, which means more kinetic energy, but the hyper-missle is also very large and heavy (40ft long, 6000lbs) with a very large explosive warhead to compensate for rods kinetic energy. Mathematically, we are coming tantalizingly close now.....but there is more.

With a converging speed of around Mach 26, the energy created by a collision would be enough to destroy both vehicles many, many times over. In fact, just the Plasma sheaths themselves colliding may be enough, so a skin-skin kill may not even be a requirement. Just get the damned thing close.

The extraordinary Chelyabinsk meteor "boom" was probably the signature of such a collision, because meteors blow up in the atmosphere quite frequently and I've never heard of any boom producing results like the Chelyabinsk event did, but I haven't delved into it much.

Your confidence despite your ignorance is.....off-putting. Humility is the key. Nobody is always right, and right makes you look a fool when your wrong. Friendly advice.

When I said "not truly known" did you really think I meant that no lift capacity numbers have EVER been given?

Numbers have been given. For everything. Just not accurately in every case. The US government says carriers can steam 35 knots but the REAL speed is much higher. There are many more examples of this happening, which I won't discuss here, but that's what I meant by "not truly known."

Sure, but some don't appreciate shills fishing for who, what, where so they can file a rare "urgent" report and get a gold star for being a good little slave.

Not that your a shill, but most are AC's. I wish AC wasnt an option at all. Registering puts a name to you, but names the shills too.

Any non-shill AC here who thinks their real name remains unknown is just bonkers.

Last Edited by SenterSun on 04/25/2014 09:09 PM

...

Great addition to the thread buddy ^^^^^^

good night!

have a good time.

The meteor that was a near earth meteor, there is a video of NASA that shows something being shot at it……… perhaps this is the same projectile that came down over Russia!

There was a 'meteor-like' object in Russia last week...

Another test?

I'm thinking this is related…..

[link to www.jimstonefreelance.com]

And apparently another one a month ago?!

Shooting meteoroid sparks flare in Yakutian skies

[link to rbth.com]

Strange, awful lot of meteor-like events going on only in Russia it seems...

Does anyone else find this odd?