Supreme-Court-Green-Lights-Detention-Of-Americans--- Fight or Pack your Bags to the FEMA CAMPS

That's vague. What exactly is a troublemaker? They can pretty much say anyone is a troublemaker when there is no defining values.

That's vague. What exactly is a troublemaker? They can pretty much say anyone is a troublemaker when there is no defining values.

The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.

They're probably using "troublemaker" as a synonym for "rebel" but they can't use the word "rebel" because that would be admitting that US citizens are slaves (because only slaves can rebel).

Agreed, time to start taking down these pussies.

The founding fathers were all "troublemakers".

This has gotta be the worst Supreme Court ever.

[link to www.wnd.com]



A decision from the U.S. Supreme Court means the federal government now has an open door to “detain as a threat to national security anyone viewed as a troublemaker,” critics of the high court’s ruling said.







The high court by its own order this week refused to review an appellate-level decision that says the president and U.S. military can arrest and indefinitely detain individuals.

Officials with William J. Olson, P.C., a firm that filed an amicus brief asking the court to step in, noted that not a single justice dissented from the denial of certiorari.

“The court ducked, having no appetite to confront both political parties in order to protect the citizens from military detention,” the legal team told WND. “The government has won, creating a tragic moment for the people – and what will someday be viewed as an embarrassment for the court.”

WND reported earlier when the indefinite detention provisions of the National Defense Authorization Act were adopted, then later challenged in court.

The controversial provision authorizes the military, under presidential authority, to arrest, kidnap, detain without trial and hold indefinitely American citizens thought to “represent an enduring security threat to the United States.”

Journalist Chris Hedges was among the plaintiffs charging the law could be used to target journalists who report on terror-related issues.

A friend-of-the

Read more at [link to www.wnd.com]


less than %50 of the Article

The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.

The question I've had about that statement is what the word "rebellion" refers to. Most people seem to think that it refers to rebellion by the masses but if it refers to rebellion by INDIVIDUALS than the Supreme Court's decision IS constitutional.

That's vague. What exactly is a troublemaker? They can pretty much say anyone is a troublemaker when there is no defining values.

The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.

The question I've had about that statement is what the word "rebellion" refers to. Most people seem to think that it refers to rebellion by the masses but if it refers to rebellion by INDIVIDUALS than the Supreme Court's decision IS constitutional.

Seems like the supreme court just made a lot of trouble. Perhaps they could be detained indefinitely without any judicial review?

Government of, by and for the people.

Military, The USA should not have a standing ARMY

The founding Fathers stated in the second amendment that the States should each have a well regulated (trained) Militia.

The NDAA goes against the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and therefore is NOT Lawful.

The fact that the US Supreme court upheld it's treason under presidential authority makes the Judges traitors against the Constitution along with Congress and the President.

When anyone who supported this "law" returns to their home state they should be arrested for violating the highest law in the Country, and attacking the rights of the people under State Law.

This is infinitely more important than the entire NBA much less Sterling, people are lost with no compass these days.

That's vague. What exactly is a troublemaker? They can pretty much say anyone is a troublemaker when there is no defining values.