Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,725 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,463,364
Pageviews Today: 2,232,650Threads Today: 753Posts Today: 14,470
06:18 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

WHAT???? BREAKING: Report Circulating That Justice John Roberts Signed Off On Obama’s Arrest For Treason

 
72111

User ID: 24289757
United States
05/04/2014 02:26 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
WHAT???? BREAKING: Report Circulating That Justice John Roberts Signed Off On Obama’s Arrest For Treason
Just found this...... is this just FAKE news or something real...

BREAKING: Report Circulating That Justice John Roberts Signed Off On Obama’s Arrest For Treason


Article 1, Sect. 1
1. Used Executive Privilege in regards to Fast & Furious gun running scandal. When Government misconduct is the concern Executive privilege is negated.
2. Issued 23 Executive Orders on gun control – infringement of the 2nd Amendment.
3. Executive Order bypassing Congress on immigration

Violation Article 1 Section 1
4. NDAA – Section 1021. Due process Rights negated.

Violation of 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th Amendments.
5. Executive Order 13603 NDRP – Government can seize anything.
6. Executive Order 13524 – Gives INTERPOL jurisdiction on American soil beyond law enforcement agencies, including the FBI.
7. Executive Order 13636 Infrastructure Cyber security – Bypassing Congress
Violations: Article 1 Section 1, Art. 4 sect. 4,
8. Signed into law the establishment of “NO Free Speech Zones” – noncompliance is a felony.
9. Attempt to tax political contributions

Violations: 1st Amendment, Art.1 sect. 7




[link to theuspatriot.com]




Last Edited by Lydia22 on 05/04/2014 02:27 PM
beeches

User ID: 28167778
United States
05/04/2014 03:37 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHAT???? BREAKING: Report Circulating That Justice John Roberts Signed Off On Obama’s Arrest For Treason
I'm guessing a fake.
Now is the time.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 15708467
United States
05/04/2014 03:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHAT???? BREAKING: Report Circulating That Justice John Roberts Signed Off On Obama’s Arrest For Treason
Just found this...... is this just FAKE news or something real...

BREAKING: Report Circulating That Justice John Roberts Signed Off On Obama’s Arrest For Treason


Article 1, Sect. 1
1. Used Executive Privilege in regards to Fast & Furious gun running scandal. When Government misconduct is the concern Executive privilege is negated.
2. Issued 23 Executive Orders on gun control – infringement of the 2nd Amendment.
3. Executive Order bypassing Congress on immigration

Violation Article 1 Section 1
4. NDAA – Section 1021. Due process Rights negated.

Violation of 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th Amendments.
5. Executive Order 13603 NDRP – Government can seize anything.
6. Executive Order 13524 – Gives INTERPOL jurisdiction on American soil beyond law enforcement agencies, including the FBI.
7. Executive Order 13636 Infrastructure Cyber security – Bypassing Congress
Violations: Article 1 Section 1, Art. 4 sect. 4,
8. Signed into law the establishment of “NO Free Speech Zones” – noncompliance is a felony.
9. Attempt to tax political contributions

Violations: 1st Amendment, Art.1 sect. 7




[link to theuspatriot.com]



 Quoting: 72111


No one can arrest the President. When will you people learn this. The only way to remove a President is to convict him in an impeachment trial.
natasha77

User ID: 47711775
United States
05/04/2014 03:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHAT???? BREAKING: Report Circulating That Justice John Roberts Signed Off On Obama’s Arrest For Treason
Just found this...... is this just FAKE news or something real...

BREAKING: Report Circulating That Justice John Roberts Signed Off On Obama’s Arrest For Treason


Article 1, Sect. 1
1. Used Executive Privilege in regards to Fast & Furious gun running scandal. When Government misconduct is the concern Executive privilege is negated.
2. Issued 23 Executive Orders on gun control – infringement of the 2nd Amendment.
3. Executive Order bypassing Congress on immigration

Violation Article 1 Section 1
4. NDAA – Section 1021. Due process Rights negated.

Violation of 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th Amendments.
5. Executive Order 13603 NDRP – Government can seize anything.
6. Executive Order 13524 – Gives INTERPOL jurisdiction on American soil beyond law enforcement agencies, including the FBI.
7. Executive Order 13636 Infrastructure Cyber security – Bypassing Congress
Violations: Article 1 Section 1, Art. 4 sect. 4,
8. Signed into law the establishment of “NO Free Speech Zones” – noncompliance is a felony.
9. Attempt to tax political contributions

Violations: 1st Amendment, Art.1 sect. 7




[link to theuspatriot.com]



 Quoting: 72111


No one can arrest the President. When will you people learn this. The only way to remove a President is to convict him in an impeachment trial.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15708467


There is ONE person allowed to arrest him.
Do your research.
Problem is, if this is true, our hours are numbered.
SPEAK UP. SILENCE IS DEADLY!

I am currently experiencing life at several WTFs per hour.

:flatearth:
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 52926192
United States
05/04/2014 04:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHAT???? BREAKING: Report Circulating That Justice John Roberts Signed Off On Obama’s Arrest For Treason
Fake. There are lots of people in the "awake" and "alternate" media that make up lies to get attention/clicks. The Roberts story is likely one of those lies.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 46348647
United States
05/04/2014 04:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHAT???? BREAKING: Report Circulating That Justice John Roberts Signed Off On Obama’s Arrest For Treason
Is it circulating the Kremlin??

1rof1
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 54016678
United States
05/04/2014 05:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHAT???? BREAKING: Report Circulating That Justice John Roberts Signed Off On Obama’s Arrest For Treason
The people making this claim clearly have NO IDEA AT ALL about how our justice system works.

In order for there to be a federal or state Warrant for anyone's arrest, a law enforcement officer, District Attorney or U.S. Attorney must seek one.

At the federal level, all law enforcement agencies, FBI, Secret Service, BATF, etc, are part of the Executive Branch of government; Department of Justice (all US Attorneys) ALL work for the President of the United States.

If a member of one of those agencies dared to even THINK about securing a warrant for the arrest of a President, he would simply be fired.

The power to enforce the laws rests solely with the President and HE delegates some of that authority to underlings in the various agencies listed above. A subordinate cannot arrest the person from whom he derives his arrest authority.

In order for a sitting President to be arrested, he must first be Impeached by the House of Representatives for "high crimes and misdemeanors." Once Impeached, a trial is held in the US Senate, with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presiding.

Evidence is presented, testimony is given and the Senate votes. It takes a simple majority (51) to CONVICT the President and at the precise moment the 51st "Guilty" vote is cast, the President is no longer President.

Only THEN can he be arrested just like any other citizen.


None of this stuff is a secret. Any basic Grade School or High School Civics class teaches this process. For folks to be adults and somehow NOT know this stuff is utterly shameful.
72111 (OP)

User ID: 24289757
United States
05/04/2014 06:16 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHAT???? BREAKING: Report Circulating That Justice John Roberts Signed Off On Obama’s Arrest For Treason
If this was true.. then Richard Nixon would not have resigned.

The PRESIDENT is not god and not a dictator.


You must be a Democrat.

The people making this claim clearly have NO IDEA AT ALL about how our justice system works.

In order for there to be a federal or state Warrant for anyone's arrest, a law enforcement officer, District Attorney or U.S. Attorney must seek one.

At the federal level, all law enforcement agencies, FBI, Secret Service, BATF, etc, are part of the Executive Branch of government; Department of Justice (all US Attorneys) ALL work for the President of the United States.

If a member of one of those agencies dared to even THINK about securing a warrant for the arrest of a President, he would simply be fired.

The power to enforce the laws rests solely with the President and HE delegates some of that authority to underlings in the various agencies listed above. A subordinate cannot arrest the person from whom he derives his arrest authority.

In order for a sitting President to be arrested, he must first be Impeached by the House of Representatives for "high crimes and misdemeanors." Once Impeached, a trial is held in the US Senate, with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presiding.

Evidence is presented, testimony is given and the Senate votes. It takes a simple majority (51) to CONVICT the President and at the precise moment the 51st "Guilty" vote is cast, the President is no longer President.

Only THEN can he be arrested just like any other citizen.


None of this stuff is a secret. Any basic Grade School or High School Civics class teaches this process. For folks to be adults and somehow NOT know this stuff is utterly shameful.
 Quoting: Interested Reader 2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 54016678
United States
06/22/2014 09:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: WHAT???? BREAKING: Report Circulating That Justice John Roberts Signed Off On Obama’s Arrest For Treason
This information is completely, totally and utterly false. Anyone with a High School Civics class education knows that not a single Justice on the Supreme Court EVER "signs-off" on ANY arrest Warrants whatsoever. That's not how the legal system works.

Lets do a quick basic civics lesson here:

1) The United States federal government is made up of three Branches:
A) Legislative (Congress i.e. The House and Senate)
b) Executive (President, Vice President and all alphabet agencies)
c) Judicial (US District Courts, Courts of Appeal and the Supreme Court.

2)Those three branches of government are "separate but equal." They each have a different function:
A) Legislative (Congress) MAKES the law
b) Executive (President etc) ENFORCES the law
c) Judicial (Courts named above) INTERPRETS the law.

In order for anyone to be arrested, a law enforcement officer must either personally Witness a crime committed in his presence, or have an Arrest Warrant signed by a Judge.

In Order to get an arrest warrant signed by a Judge, a law enforcement officer must swear out a Complaint and bring it to his Superior Officer for approval to take it to a federal Judge. All such Complaints must be approved by superiors in the law enforcement agency before the officer can ask a Judge for a Warrant. If the Officer fails or refuses to get approval, he gets suspended or fired. Further, NO superior in ANY federal law enforcement agency would EVER approve an application to arrest a sitting president. Here's why:


ALL law enforcement Officers at the federal level derive their power from and through the EXECUTIVE Branch; i.e. The President. Thus, a law enforcement officer cannot arrest the very source of his arrest power because, as President, Obama can either fire any officer who attempts such an arrest (they ALL technically work for him), or Obama can Pardon himself on the spot.

So get it through your head: A sitting President cannot be arrested. Ever. Period. End of story.

If anyone cares, the Warrant process then goes like this:
The federal law enforcement agent swears out a Complaint, gets it approved by his Superiors and takes it to a federal Magistrate. Magistrates are the spokes-in-the-wheel of the federal Judiciary, taking on the majority of day-to-day "grunt" work in the federal courts. Just because a federal agent takes a complaint to a Magistrate, does NOT mean the Magistrate would sign-off on an arrest Warrant. You can bet that none of them would DARE do so against a sitting President because each Magistrate knows the President is "separate but equal to" the Judiciary. It would create an instant Constitutional Crisis.

So that's another "stop" which wrecks any effort to see an arrest warrant issued for a President.

For us regular folk, if the Magistrate signs-off on an arrest warrant, the federal agent goes out to make the arrest. The person is taken into custody, brought before a Magistrate Judge, informed of the charge against him and of his legal rights. A plea is entered, usually NOT GUILTY. Bail is (or is not) set.

Next stop, U.S. District Court for criminal trial.

If he wins, case over. If he loses, he can Appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for whichever "Circuit" covers the state within which he was arrested.

If the Appeal is successful, he wins, case over. If not, he can TRY to be heard at the United States Supreme Court, but he has no "right" to be heard there.

At that level, the SUPREME COURT decides which cases it will hear. There is no "right" to be heard at the Supreme Court, one must APPLY to be heard. They get about eleven-thousand (11,000) such applications each year and only approve about one-hundred (100).

So please cut the bullshit about Chief Justice Roberts signing off on an arrest warrant for Obama. It cannot happen.

The only way a law-breaking President can be removed other than by an election, is through Impeachment in the House of Representatives. If a Majority of the House votes to Impeach (must be for "high crimes and misdemeanors") then a trial is held in the US Senate. If a majority of Senators votes "Guilty" the President is-- at that very micro-second -- no longer President. Only at that time, is he back to being a regular citizen and only THEN can he be arrested.


It pisses me off to no end that so many people are completely ignorant of how their own system works. Where the hell did you get educated? You should go back and sue them for malpractice! They failed to educate you.

One more thing, INTERPOL has NO ARREST POWER. It is merely an organization of duly-constituted police agencies around the world and exists SOLELY to share information about who is "Wanted" and why. INTERPOL cannot arrest anyone. See, another failure of your education. My God, how can so many people be so utterly ignorant of the real world?