| Users Online Now: 2,081 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,339,741 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,918,874 | Threads Today: 528 | Posts Today: 10,208 |
| 03:37 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,081 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,339,741 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,918,874 | Threads Today: 528 | Posts Today: 10,208 |
| 03:37 PM | ||
The one thing that destroys the moon hoax theorists argument. | |
Rabid Wolf  User ID: 19270936  United States05/26/2014 04:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 60 hours of Lunar Rover footage can't be shot in a man made moon set. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1419030 Some footage is 3 or 4 hours continuos. Oh, you mean "moon-landing was a hoax" people. Actually, you don't need continuous footage to realize it was shot on location (The Moon). Just pay attention to the dust the tires kick up. It does not linger, so there is no atmosphere where they are filming. Some folks like to pretend it was done in the world's largest pressure chamber, and in a vacuum. These people have no understanding of physics. Atmospheric pressure at sea level is about 14.7psi (pounds per square inch) Now that supposed vacuum chamber is how many acres large and how tall? If it were only a dinky 5 acres (330 feet by 660 feet) and 50 feet tall, you are still talking about 960,498 tons of just air-pressure crushing down on that structure. It would be easier and far cheaper to simply risk the lives of gung-ho astronauts stuffed in a lightly radiation-shielded tin cans strapped to rockets, than it would be to build a vacuum chamber that could withstand those pressures. The moon landing hoaxers are so scientifically ignorant that to argue with them is pointless. Trust me on this one. The only people lower on the rungs are the flat Earthers. lol, No worries. I just felt like playing this morning!  |
| Celtic Ranger User ID: 37513297 United States05/26/2014 04:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In addition, why didn't they take the shuttle out into deep space just for shits and giggles if it wasn't a big deal? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54847409 I heard it was because the ground crew kept forgetting to fill the gas tank on the shuttle before launch. Every time they got into orbit the flight crew saw the gauge on empty and said "DOH! Lenny forgot to fill er up again!" No trip to Jupiter or where ever. Blame Lenny! Last Edited by Artanis on 05/26/2014 04:33 PM Be civil to all; sociable to many; familiar with few; friend to one; enemy to none. Benjamin Franklin |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 862656  Canada05/26/2014 04:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1) Yes, men orbited the Earth, landed on the moon, and walked around for a bit. Deal with it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58490531 2) Most, almost all, UFOs can be explained and or Earthly origin. 3) Ghosts, demons, vampires, werewolfs, zombies do not exist. 4) No one can read your mind, see into the future. No one. It's all a scam and fake. Neither can they communicate with the dead. Grow up, people. I could go on, but you get the point. Have a nice day. Scientifically speaking since we live in a space and time multiverse, ghosts and demons cannot be ruled out. Nor can an all knowing creator. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 55100066 United States05/26/2014 04:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In order to fake the moon landings, they would also have had to fake radio frequency communication signals. Radio equipment of that era would have been sufficiently advanced to detect where those communications originated. Is it even remotely possible that the Soviet Union, let alone the tens of thousands of monitoring stations both government and privately owned around the world, would have kept a secret like that? Do you suppose the CIA or any other government agency would have been able to silence all those people? Then there were 6 additional moon missions. Were those faked too? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 55100066 duh, think about this for a minute. what motive do any countries have for "whistle-blowing" on something like this? It would just be called enemy propaganda by the U.S. and raise unnecessary tension. furthermore, it is just plain naive to believe that bedtime story about elite military intelligence of different countries being genuinely opposed to each other. that is just mythology. all of these guys are in the same international brotherhoods. That's not to say they want lob stones at each other from time to time, but they're not going to spoil each others secrets, if only for the reason that the other guy will retaliate and spoil their own secrets... It's like media advertising agencies. They all use subliminal psychological warfare on the common people. One of those companies could spill the beans on what their competitor is doing, but it wouldn't make any sense because it would be a loss for their own business. People who swallow this USA vs. Soviet Union story wholesale are brainwashed. A lot of what we see is only for show for the commoners of each country. Your little mythical tale has one fatal flaw...there were probably thousands of monitoring stations that day that were NOT government owned. I'm sure finding an conspiracy in every box of corn flakes sustains your paranoia, but not everything is a conspiracy. The bullshit is just that, with no scientific or logical basis whatsoever. The Soviets had NOTHING to lose and EVERYTHING to gain by outing this as a hoax. And literally a Million people would have to keep this secret. Fail. Colossally failed. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 47938245 United States05/26/2014 08:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The idea of the lunar rover is proof that the moon landings were fake. What scientific purpose did it serve to risk the lives of the astronauts? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54847409 Proof of concept and allowed them to travel farther to collect a greater variety of samples. The lunar rover was attached to the Lander with no impact whatsoever? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54847409 No, it was only added on the last three missions which used the extended J class LM. [link to en.wikipedia.org] It was slightly bigger with more fuel allowing greater payload and longer stays. They folded up with the rest of the vehicle. Here's a video showing it being deployed |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 47938245 United States05/26/2014 08:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 60 hours of Lunar Rover footage can't be shot in a man made moon set. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1419030 Some footage is 3 or 4 hours continuos. Oh, you mean "moon-landing was a hoax" people. Actually, you don't need continuous footage to realize it was shot on location (The Moon). Just pay attention to the dust the tires kick up. It does not linger, so there is no atmosphere where they are filming. Some folks like to pretend it was done in the world's largest pressure chamber, and in a vacuum. These people have no understanding of physics. Atmospheric pressure at sea level is about 14.7psi (pounds per square inch) Now that supposed vacuum chamber is how many acres large and how tall? If it were only a dinky 5 acres (330 feet by 660 feet) and 50 feet tall, you are still talking about 960,498 tons of just air-pressure crushing down on that structure. It would be easier and far cheaper to simply risk the lives of gung-ho astronauts stuffed in a lightly radiation-shielded tin cans strapped to rockets, than it would be to build a vacuum chamber that could withstand those pressures. speaking of dust the lunar module's engine created 10000 pounds of thrust it should have excavated a hole big enough to swallow the lander itself in addition to creating a hell of a dust storm but it didn't Should it really? The harrier produced more thrust than that and it doesn't dig craters. Plus they throttled the engine down when landing. At full thrust they'd be going up not slowing going down to the surface. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 47938245 United States05/26/2014 08:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The furthest mankind has gotten in space is low earth orbit, like the Space Shuttle. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11157340 In addition, why didn't they take the shuttle out into deep space just for shits and giggles if it wasn't a big deal? Not enough fuel. Even if they brought more fuel, on the return they'd need even more to slow down as it wasn't designed for the higher speed reentry. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 58529751  Australia05/26/2014 08:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The furthest mankind has gotten in space is low earth orbit, like the Space Shuttle. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11157340 In addition, why didn't they take the shuttle out into deep space just for shits and giggles if it wasn't a big deal? Not enough fuel. Even if they brought more fuel, on the return they'd need even more to slow down as it wasn't designed for the higher speed reentry. you gotta luv these nasa shills.. got an answer to everything  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1496241 United States05/26/2014 08:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 47938245 United States05/26/2014 08:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you go and play on google earth you can zoom in and see buildings , roads , cars , trees and plenty of other fine detail all obtained from satellites. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58514308 A satellite around the moon would be much closer to the surface because of the much smaller size of the moon and we see NOTHING. We have satellites that could image the astronauts footprints if we wanted too yet the only pics ever shown are CRAP. Obvious hoax is obvious. [link to m.youtube.com] This is for you and the poster above. You can find stuff and junk and things if you leave the woo woo sites from time to time. Do ya get your news from john Daily too? They said in the video the satellite was orbiting 15 miles up and look at the pics ... CRAP Is that the best they can do ? Google earth satellites are 100 miles up and give us crispy clean clear pictures yet NASA moon satellite 15 miles up gives SHIT out of focus rubbish LOLOLOL most of the clear imagery on Google Earth is from airplanes, NOT satellites. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 47938245 United States05/26/2014 08:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The furthest mankind has gotten in space is low earth orbit, like the Space Shuttle. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11157340 In addition, why didn't they take the shuttle out into deep space just for shits and giggles if it wasn't a big deal? Not enough fuel. Even if they brought more fuel, on the return they'd need even more to slow down as it wasn't designed for the higher speed reentry. you gotta luv these nasa shills.. got an answer to everything It was actually studied. The shuttle was a large vehicle requiring a lot of fuel to get to orbit. It would require even more to get the extra delta v to break orbit and again even more to slow down for reentry. Then you need even more fuel to get that other fuel up there. |
| V for Ventura, House of Ace User ID: 56236420 United States05/27/2014 06:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Funny, I always thought the onen thing that debunked their arguement is that their average IQ is 25. Birther tards and moontards are the worst plague to ever infest this website. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1496241 onen? arguement? Should probably learn to spell before attacking anyone else's IQ you doddering retard. Typical Anonymous Coward spineless rant, you really want to prove your point internet tough guy? Donate to the site, make a screen name and then come debate why you believe(told to think this way) that we actually against all odds landed a garbage can on the moon, stayed for 21.5hrs,only went out on the Lunar surface for 2.5hrs and then without a single mistake,incident or miscalculation added 48lbs of Lunar rocks to the capsule and lifted off the Moon. Then they rejoined Michael Collins&the Command Spacecraft without any problem whatsoever and then just returned to Earth like it was a quick drive to the store and back. Not a single issue with any of the electronics or space junk or the fact that we have more tech on our iphone than the entire space program at that time...... Yep we are the ones who are dumb. Last Edited by V for Ventura, House of Ace on 05/29/2014 08:14 PM |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 58549591 United States05/27/2014 06:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 41729127 United States05/27/2014 06:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You misspelled continuous. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 10151824 Aside from that your are wrong. The one thing that destroys the hoax argument is the existence of the retro reflective mirrors that they left. But here is what happened. The footage we have all seen is staged. It was created on earth. This was done as insurance against failure. If the mission had failed they would still make it look like a win with the staged footage. It did not fail, but they still used the staged footage. They also did not show you what really went on while they were on the moon. Bingo because if we were to really see the technology we employed to go up there one might start wondering why we use gasoline powered cars and pay for electricity. Can't be rocking the multi trillion dollar enslavement tool now can we ? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28285524 United States05/27/2014 07:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 1) Yes, men orbited the Earth, landed on the moon, and walked around for a bit. Deal with it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58490531 2) Most, almost all, UFOs can be explained and or Earthly origin. 3) Ghosts, demons, vampires, werewolfs, zombies do not exist. 4) No one can read your mind, see into the future. No one. It's all a scam and fake. Neither can they communicate with the dead. Grow up, people. I could go on, but you get the point. Have a nice day.  x2 |
| gus and crew User ID: 17998157 United States05/27/2014 07:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
